Abstract
This article considers the design performance of orthogonal arrays in which one or more runs are missing at random. We focus on orthogonal arrays of index unity and on the 18 run ternary arrays.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, T., M. Akhtar, and S. G. Gilmour. 2012. Multilevel augmented pairs second-order response surface designs and their robustness to missing data. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 41:437–52. doi:10.1080/03610926.2010.513783.
Ahmad, T., and S. Gilmour. 2010. Robustness of subset response surface designs to missing observations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140 (1):92–103. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.06.011.
Akhtar, M., and P. Prescott. 1986. Response surface designs robust to missing observations. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 15 (2):345–63. doi:10.1080/ 03610918608812512.
Bird, E., and D. J. Street. 2017. Tables of non-isomorphic 18 run orthogonal arrays. University of Technology Sydney, https://www.uts.edu.au/research-and-teaching/our-research/health-economics-research-and-evaluation/our-research/working
Bird, E. M., and D. J. Street. 2016. D-optimal asymmetric orthogonal array plus p run designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 170:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2015.09.001.
Box, G. E. P. 1953. Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika 40 (3/4):318–35. doi:10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.318.
Chatzopoulos, S. A., F. Kolyva-Machera, and K. Chatterjee. 2011. Optimality results on orthogonalarrays plus p runs for sm factorial experiments. Metrika 73 (3):385–94. doi:10.1007/s00184-009-0284-x.
Da Silva, M. A., S. G. Gilmour, and L. A. Trinca. 2016. Factorial and response surface designs robust to missing observations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 113:261–72. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.023.
Eendebak, P., and E. Schoen. 2010. Complete series of non-isomorphic orthogonal arrays, http://pietereendebak.nl/oapage/.
Ghosh, S. 1982a. Information in an observation in robust designs. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 12 (14):1173–84. doi:10.1080/03610928208828302.
Ghosh, S. 1982b. Robustness of designs against the unavailability of data. Sankhya Series B 44 (1):50–62.
Gilmour, S. G. 2006. Factor screening via supersaturated designs. In Screening methods for experimentation in inductry, drug discovery, and genetics, ed. A. Dean and S. Lewis, 169–90. New York, NY: Springer.
Harville, D. A. 1997. Matrix algebra from a statistician’s perspective. New York, NY: Springer- Verlag.
Herzberg, A. 1982. The robust design of experiments: A review. Serdica 8:223–28.
MacEachern, S., W. Notz, D. Whittinghill, and Y. Zhu. 1995. Robustness to the unavailability of data in the linear model, with applications. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 48 (2):207–13. doi:10.1016/0378-3758(95)00002-Q.
Schoen, E. D. 2009. All orthogonal arrays with 18 runs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25 (4):467–80. doi:10.1002/qre.v25:4.
Srivastava, R., V. K. Gupta, and A. Dey. 1991. Robustness of some designs against missing data. Journal of Applied Statistics 18:313–18. doi:10.1080/02664769100000030.
Tanco, M., E. Del Castillo, and E. Viles. 2013. Robustness of three-level response surface designs against missing data. HE Transactions 45 (5):544–53. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2012.712240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Street, D.J., Bird, E.M. D-optimal orthogonal array minus t run designs. J Stat Theory Pract 12, 575–594 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2018.1441081
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2018.1441081