Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the remaining testing time for the generalized Pareto progressive censoring samples with applications to extreme hydrology events

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of the unobserved units is typically based on the derivations of the predictive distributions of the individual observations. This technique is of little interest when one wishes to predict a function of missing or unobserved data such as the remaining testing time. In this article, based on a progressive type-II censored sample from the generalized Pareto (GP) distribution, we consider the problem of predicting times to failure of units in multiple stages. Importance sampling is used to estimate the model parameters, and Gibbs and Metropolis samplers are used to predict the testing times of the removed unfailed units. Data analyses involving the water-level exceedances by the River Nidd in North Yorkshire, England, have been performed and predictions of the total remaining level exceedances are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahsanullah, M. 1992. Inference and prediction problems of the generalized Pareto distribution based on record values. In Order statistics and nonparametrics: Theory and applications, ed. P.K. Sen and L. A. Salama, 47–57. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asgharzadeh, A., M. Mohammadpour, and Z. M. Ganji. 2014. Estimation and reconstruction based on left censored data from Pareto model. Journal of the Iranian Statistical Society 13 (2):151–75.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharzadeh, A., R. Valiollahi, and M. Z. Raqab. 2011. Stress-strength reliability of Weibull distribution based on progressively censored samples. Statistics & Operations Research Transactions 35 (2):103–24.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, N. and R. Aggrawala. 2000. Progressive censoring, theory, methods and applications. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, N., N. Kannan, C. T. Lin, and S. J. S. Wu. 2004. Inference for the extreme value distribution under progressive type-II censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 25:25–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basak, I., P. Basak, and N. Balakrishnan. 2006. On some predictors of times to failures of censored items in progressively censored sample. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50:1313–37.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez, P. Z., and M. A. Turkman. 2003. Bayesian approach to parameter estimation of the generalized Pareto distribution. Test 12 (1):259–77.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., and R. L. Berger. 2002. Statistical inference, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E., and J. Daoudi. 2009. Estimation of the generalized Pareto distribution. Statistics and Probability Letters 79:684–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E., A. S. Hadi, N. Balakrishnan, and J. M. Sarabia. 2004. Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A., and H. N. Nagaraja. 2003. Order statistics, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C. 1984. Modelling excesses over high thresholds, with an application. In Statistical Extremes and Applications, ed. J. Tiago de Oliveira and D. Reidel, 461–482. Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C., and R. L. Smith. 1990. Models for exceedances over high thresholds. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 52:393–442.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R., S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, 1995. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practise. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fligner, M. A., and D. A. Wolfe. 1979. Nonparametric prediction intervals for a future sample median. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:453–56.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, N. D., P. Højen-Sørensen, M. Jordan, and S. Russell. 2001. Variational MCMC. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 70:120–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis. 1987. Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics 29:339–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, K. S., and P. I. Nelson. 1998. Prediction of order statistics. In Handbook of statistics, order statistics: Applications, Vol. 17, ed. N. Balakrishnan and C. R. Rao, 43–50. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., J. Jung, and Y. Chung. 2011. Bayesian estimation for the exponentiated Weibull model under type II progressive censoring. Statistical Papers 52 (1):53–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., and S. Nadarajah. 2000. Extreme value distributions: Theory and applications. London, UK: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. T., and W. Y. Wang. 2000. Estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution with censored data. Communications in Statistics — Simulation and Computation 29 (4):1183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousa, M. A., and S. A. Al-Sagheer. 2006. Statistical inference for the Rayleigh model based on progressively type-II censored data. Statistics 40 (2):149–57.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Environment Research Council. 1975. Flood studies report. London, UK: Water Environment Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, H. K. T. 2005. Parameter estimation for a modified Weibull distribution for progressively type-II censored samples. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 54 (3):374–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickands, J. 1975. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Annals of Statistics 3:119–31.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raqab, M. Z., and R. A. Al-Jarallah. 2015. Prediction intervals for future Weibull residual data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 86 (7):1320–33.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raqab, M. Z., and M. T. Madi. 2002. Bayesian prediction of the total time on test using doubly censored Rayleigh data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 72:781–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C., and G. Casella. 2004. Monte Carlo statistical methods, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinharay, S. 2003. Assessing convergence of the Markov chain monte carlo algorithms: a review. Educational Testing Service, Research & Development Division Princeton, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. 1984. Threshold methods for sample extremes. In Statistical extremes and applications, ed. J.T. de Oliveira, 621–38. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. 1994. Markov Chains for exploring posterior distributions. Annals of Statistics 22:1701–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor and referees for their encouragement, comments, and helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Z. Raqab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raqab, M.Z., Bdair, O.M., Madi, M.T. et al. Prediction of the remaining testing time for the generalized Pareto progressive censoring samples with applications to extreme hydrology events. J Stat Theory Pract 12, 165–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2017.1338168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2017.1338168

KEYWORDS

Navigation