Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal two-level choice designs for estimating main and specified two-factor interaction effects

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the multinomial logit model, designs for choice experiments are usually based on an a priori assumption that either only the main effects of the factors or the main effects and all two-factor interaction effects are to be estimated. However, in practice, there are situations where interest lies in the estimation of main plus some two-factor interaction effects. For example, interest on such specified two-factor interaction effects arise in situations when one or two factor(s) like price and/or brand of a product interact individually with the other factors of the product. For two-level choice experiments with n factors, we consider a model involving the main plus all two-factor interaction effects, with our interest lying in the estimation of the main effects and a specified set of two-factor interaction effects. The two-factor interaction effects of interest are either (i) one factor interacting with each of the remaining n − 1 factors or (ii) each of the two factors interacting with each of the remaining n − 2 factors. For the two models, we first characterize the information matrix and then construct universally optimal choice designs for choice set sizes 3 and 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess, L., and D. J. Street. 2003. Optimal designs for 2k choice experiments. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 32 (11):2185–206.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W.-Y., and P. W. M. John. 1998. D-optimal fractional factorial designs. Statistics & Probability Letters 37 (4):367–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A. and R. Singh. 2016. A unified approach to choice experiments. Technical Report, IIT Bombay, https://doi.org/dspace.library.iitb.ac.in/jspui/handle/100/18429.

  • Demirkale, F., D. Donovan, and D. J. Street. 2013. Constructing D-optimal symmetric stated preference discrete choice experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 143 (8):1380–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, Α., and R. Mukerjee. 1999. Inter-effect orthogonality and optimality in hierarchical models. Sankhya 61 (3):460–68.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, Α., and C.-Y. Suen. 2002. Optimal fractional factorial plans for main effects and specified two-factor interactions: A projective geometric approach. Annals of Statistics 30 (5):1512–23.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grafihoff, U., H. Grofimann, H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2003. Optimal paired comparison designs for first-order interactions. Statistics 37 (5):373–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grafihoff, U., H. Großmann, H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2004. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126 (1):361–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Großmann, H. and R. Schwabe. 2015. Design for discrete choice experiments. In M. Morris, J. Stufken, and D. Bingham. Handbook of design and analysis of experiments, ed. A. Dean, 787–831. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. S., and Η. Pesotan. 1992. Two-level factorial designs for main effects and selected two-factor interactions. Statistica Sinica 2 (2):453–64.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. S., and H. Pesotan. 1997. Designs for two-level factorial experiments with linear models containing main effects and selected two-factor interactions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 64 (1):109–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., and K. Zwerina. 1996. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 33:307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J. 1975. Construction and optimality of generalized Youden designs. In A survey of statistical design and linear models (Proc. Internat. Sympos., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, Colo., 1973), 333–53. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., F.-S. Chai, and A. Das. 2015. Optimal two-level choice designs for any number of choice sets. Biometrika 102 (4):967–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. 2007. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods, vol. 647. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. 2012. Designs for choice experiments for the multinomial logit model. In Design and analysis of experiments, special designs and applications, ed. K. Hinkelmann, vol. 3, 331–78. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C, and Y. Chen. 1992. A graph-aided method for planning two-level experiments when certain interactions are important. Technometrics 34 (2):162–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, FS., Das, A. & Singh, R. Optimal two-level choice designs for estimating main and specified two-factor interaction effects. J Stat Theory Pract 12, 82–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2017.1329101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2017.1329101

Keywords

AMS Subject Classification

Navigation