References
Bickel, D. R. 2011. A predictive approach to measuring the strength of statistical evidence for single and multiple comparisons. Can. J. Stat., 39, 610–631.
Bickel, D. R. 2012. The strength of statistical evidence for composite hypotheses: Inference to the best explanation. Stat. Sin., 22, 1147–1198.
Edwards, E., H. Lindman, and L. J. Savage 1963. Bayesian statistical inference in psychological research. Psychol. Rev, 70, 193–242.
He, Y., W. Huang, and H. Liang 2007. Axiomatic development of profile likelihoods as the strength of evidence for composite hypotheses. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 36, 2695–2706.
Royall, R. 1997. Statistical evidence: A likelihood paradigm. Boca Raton, FL, Chapman & Hall.
Royall, R. 2000a. On the probability of observing misleading statistical evidence. J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 95, 760–768.
Royall, R. 2000b. On the probability of observing misleading statistical evidence: Rejoinder. J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 95, 773–780.
Royall, R., and T.-S. Tsou. 2003. Interpreting statistical evidence by using imperfect models: Robust adjusted likelihood functions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 65, 391–404.
Zhang, Z. 2009a. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions. Biometrical J., 51(4), 710–720.
Zhang, Z. 2009b. A law of likelihood for composite hypotheses. Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0463.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Zhang, B. Rejoinder. J Stat Theory Pract 7, 196–203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.771552
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.771552