Rebound effects of price differences
- Joan ThiesenAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University Email author
- , Torben S. ChristensenAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Thomas G. KristensenAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Rikke D. AndersenAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Brit BrunoeAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Trine K. GregersenAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Mikkel ThraneAffiliated withDepartment of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
- , Bo P. WeidemaAffiliated with
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Goal, Scope and Background
Traditionally, comparative life cycle assessments (LCA) have not considered rebound effects, for instance in case of significant price differences among the compared products. No justifications have been made for this delimitation in scope. This article shows that price differences and the consequent effects of marginal consumer expenditure may influence the conclusions of comparative LCA significantly. We also show that considerations about rebound effects of price differences can be included in LCAs.
The direct rebound effect of a price difference is marginal consumption. Based on statistical data on private consumption in different income groups (Statistics Denmark 2005a, 2005b), the present article provides an estimate of how an average Danish household will spend an additional 1 DKK for further consumer goods, when the household has gained money from choosing a cheaper product alternative. The approach is to use marginal income changes and the following changes in consumption patterns as an expression for marginal consumption. Secondly, the environmental impact potentials related to this marginal consumption are estimated by the use of environmental impact intensity data from an IO-LCA database (Weidema et al. 2005). Finally, it is discussed whether, and in which ways the conclusions of comparative LCAs can be affected by including the price difference between product alternatives. This is elucidated in a case study of a comparative LCA screening of two different kinds of Danish cheese products (Fricke et al. 2004).
Car purchase and driving, use and maintenance of dwelling, clothing purchase and insurance constitutes the largest percentages of the marginal consumption. In a case study of two cheeses, the including the impact potentials related to the price difference results in significant changes in the total impact potentials. Considering the relatively small price difference of the two products, it is likely also to have a significant influence on the results of comparative LCAs more generally.
The influence of marginal consumption in comparative LCAs is relevant to consider in situations with large differences in the price of the product alternatives being compared, and in situations with minor differences in the impact potentials related to the alternatives. However, different uncertainties are linked to determining the pattern for marginal consumption and the environmental impact potential related to this. These are first of all related to the method used, but also include inaccurate data of consumption in households, aggregation and weighting of income groups, aggregation of product groups, estimation and size of the price difference, and the general applicability of the results.
Incorporating marginal consumption in consequential LCAs is possible in practice. In the case study used, including the rebound effects of the price difference has a significant influence on the result of the comparative LCA, as the result for the impact categories acidification and nutrient enrichment changes in favour of the expensive product.
Recommendations and Perspectives
It is recommended that the rebound effects of price differences should be included more frequently in LCAs. In order to ensure this, further research in marginal consumption and investment patterns and IO data for different countries or regions is required. Furthermore, this study does not consider the economic distributional consequences of buying an expensive product instead of a cheaper product (e.g. related to how the profit is spent by those who provided the product). It should also be noted, that more expensive products not necessarily result in less consumption, as those who provided the product also will spend the money they have earned from the sale. Ideally, these consequences should also be further investigated. Likewise, the development of databases to include marginal consumption in PC-tools is needed. In general, considerations of marginal consumption would favour expensive product alternatives, depending, however, on the type of consumer.
KeywordsConsequential LCA consumption dynamics income elasticity of demand I-O Analysis marginal consumption price differences rebound effect sustainable consumption system delimitation
- Rebound effects of price differences
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume 13, Issue 2 , pp 104-114
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Consequential LCA
- consumption dynamics
- income elasticity of demand
- I-O Analysis
- marginal consumption
- price differences
- rebound effect
- sustainable consumption
- system delimitation
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Fibigerstraede 13, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark
- 2. 2.-0 LCA consultants, Amagertorv 3, 2., 1160, Copenhagen K, Denmark