Skip to main content
Log in

A European Union global strategy for a changing world?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The EU agreed a ‘global strategy on foreign and security policy’ in June 2016, in the midst of unprecedented turmoil within the EU and outside it. This article begins with a discussion of what ‘strategy’ entails, and the challenges of strategising in the EU. It then traces the development of the EU global strategy, focusing on why it was considered to be necessary, and summarises its content. Finally, the article analyses the new strategy in terms of clarity of strategic objectives, specification of resources dedicated to the pursuit of those objectives, and provision for monitoring of progress made in achieving the objectives. The global strategy provides a more ‘realist’ guide for EU foreign and security policy in the near future, but Brexit presents a severe challenge to implementing it in a world in which EU influence is increasingly resisted or contested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amnesty International. 2016. Egypt: Unprecedented Crackdown on NGOs, 23 March. https://www.amnesty.org/en/press-releases/2016/03/egypt-unprecedented-crackdown-on-ngos/.

  • Autessere, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, Peter. 2016. Israel passes law to force NGOs to reveal foreign funding. The Guardian, 12 July.

  • Bendiek, Annegret, and Heinz Kramer. 2010. The EU as a strategic international actor. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (4): 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendiek, Annegret. 2016. The global strategy for the EU’s foreign and security policy, SWP Comments 38, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

  • Bicchi, Federica, Nicola Chelotti, Spyros Economides, and Karen E. Smith. 2015. Response to call for evidence, House of Lords EU External Affairs Sub-Committee ‘The Strategic Review of the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy’, 29 September. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/eu-external-affairs-subcommittee/strategic-review-of-the-eus-foreign-and-security-policy/written/21950.html.

  • Biscop, Sven. 2005. The European security strategy: A global agenda for positive power. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biscop, Sven. 2012. Raiders of the lost art: Strategy-making in Europe, Egmont Security Policy Brief no. 4. Brussels: Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.

  • Biscop, Sven. 2016. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European characteristics. Egmont Security Policy Brief no. 75.

  • Caprara, Maurizio. 2016. Mogherini: “Dopo lo choc del voto britannico occorre ridare fiducia. Corriere della Sera.

  • Chaban, N., O. Elsgtrom, and M. Holland. 2007. The European Union in the eyes of others, Special Issue of European Foreign Affairs Review, 12 (3).

  • Council of the European Union. 2016. Implementation plan on security and defence, 14 November, document no. 14392/16.

  • Council of Foreign Ministers. 1992. Report to the European Council in Lisbon on the Likely Development of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), Annex to the Conclusions of the Presidency, Lisbon, European Council, EC Bulletin no. 6.

  • European Commission. 2013. Action plan for resilience in crisis prone countries 2013–2020, SWD (2013) 227.

  • European Commission. 2014. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, A global actor in search of a strategy: European Union Foreign Policy between bilateralism and multilateralism. European Commission document EUR 26572 EN.

  • European Council. 1988. ‘Declaration by the European Council on the International Role of the European Community (The Rhodes Declaration), Rhodes, 3 December 1988’, document no. 2/17. In European Foreign Policy: Key Documents, eds. Christopher Hill and Karen E. Smith, 149–151. London: Routledge, 2000.

  • European Council. 2013. Conclusions, 20 December 2013, document EUCO 217/13. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/european-council-conclusions-december-2013.

  • European Council. 2015. Conclusions, 25–26 June, document EUCO 22/15 (http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-22-2015-INIT/en/pdf.

  • European External Action Service. 2015. The European Union in a changing global environment: A more connected, contested and complex world, 25 June. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/strategic-review-european-union-changing-global-environment.

  • European Union. 2003. A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy. Brussels.

  • European Union. 2008. Report on the implementation of the European Security strategy, European Union, ‘Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy—Providing Security in a Changing World’, Brussels 11 December, document S407/08.

  • European Union. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/eugs_review_web.pdf.

  • Freedman, Lawrence. 2013. Strategy: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldgeier, James, and Jeremi Suri. 2015. Revitalizing the U.S. National Security Strategy. The Washington Quarterly 38 (4): 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Mary N. 2000. ”The past, the present and the perhaps”: Is Germany a “normal” power? Security Studies 10 (2): 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Christopher. 2004. Renationalising or regrouping: EU foreign policy since 11 September 2001. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95 (3): 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holslag, Jonathan. 2011. The elusive axis: Assessing the EU–China strategic partnership. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, Jolyon. 2010. The EU as a global actor: Grand strategy for a global grand bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (3): 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2016. Russia: Government vs Rights Groups, 22 September. https://www.hrw.org/russia-government-against-rights-groups-battle-chronicle.

  • Hyde-Price, Adrian. 2008. A “tragic actor”? A realist perspective on “ethical power Europe”. International Affairs 84 (1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Affairs Institute, Polish Institute of International Affair, Elcano Royal Institute, and Swedish Institute of International Affairs. 2013. Towards a European Global Strategy: Securing European Influence in a Changing World. http://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=13792.

  • Kausch, Kristina. 2016. The EU global strategy in the Shadow of Brexit, Carnegie Europe, 7 July. http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=64034.

  • Laatikainen, Katie Verlin. 2010. Multilateral Leadership at the UN after the Lisbon Treaty. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (4): 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, Hanns W. 2016. Sadly, the EUGS reads more like a symptom of the problem than part of a solution to Europe’s deep crisis. The International Spectator 51 (3): 34–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Christoph O. 2005. Convergence towards a European strategic culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms. European Journal of International Relations 11 (4): 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogherini, Federica. 2016. Remarks made in the video on the EU global strategy, on the EUGS homepage. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/.

  • Müller, Patrick. 2016. EU foreign policy: No major breakthrough despite multiple crises. Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco Pardo, Ramon. 2012. Normal power Europe: Non-proliferation and the normalization of EU’s foreign policy. Journal of European Integration 34 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomorska, Karolina, and Sophie Vanhoonacker. 2016. Europe as a global actor: Searching for a new strategic approach. Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review of the European Union in 2015 54 (1): 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Karen E. 2013. The European Union and the politics of legitimisation at the United Nations. European Foreign Affairs Review 18 (1): 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Karen E. 2014. European Union foreign policy in a changing world, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Daniel C. 2012. Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3): 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, Nathalie. 2015. Towards an EU global strategy. In Towards an EU global strategy: Background, process, references, ed. Antonio Missiroli. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, Nathalie. 2016. The making of the global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK. 2010. HM government, ‘A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy’, Cm 7953.

  • Van Ham, Peter. 2016. The EU’s “Caoutchouc” strategy: Something for everyone. The International Spectator 51 (3): 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Wolfgang, and Rosanne Anholt. 2016. Resilience as the EU global strategy’s new leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William (forthcoming). European Diplomacy since the Cold War: How ambitious? How inhibited?’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

  • Wetzel, Anne, and Jan Orbie. 2011. With map and compass on narrow paths and through shallow waters: Discovering the substance of EU democracy promotion. European Foreign Affairs Review 16 (5): 705–725.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, K.E. A European Union global strategy for a changing world?. Int Polit 54, 503–518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0041-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0041-0

Keywords

Navigation