Skip to main content
Log in

Policy Learning in the Development of Bologna Study Cycles in Ukraine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article investigates how policy learning could be used as an analytical tool for studying the development process of Bologna study cycles (Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctorate’s or Ph.D.) in the Ukrainian higher education context. The development of the Bologna study cycles in Ukraine is associated with the fact that Ukraine joined the Bologna process. The findings show that the Bologna study cycles in Ukraine have been developing on the basis of the old national education-qualification and scientific cycles through a so-called process of layering of minor innovations. This layering has been quite productive as it was exercised jointly by multiple policy actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexiadou, N. (2014) ‘Policy learning and Europeanisation in education: the governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge’, in A. Nordin and D. Sundberg (eds.) Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: The Making and Governing of Knowledge in the Education Policy Field, Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreichuk, S.K. (2007) Derzhavne upravlinnya reformuvannya vyshchoyi osvoty v Ukrayini v koneksti Bolonskogo Protsesu [State management of higher education reform in Ukraine in the context of the Bologna Process] (Candidate of Sciences), Lviv, Ukraine: Lviv Regional Institute of State Management. Retrieved 18 December 2018 from http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis64r_81/cgiirbis_64.exe?Z21ID = &I21DBN = ARD&P21DBN = ARD&S21STN = 1&S21REF = 10&S21FMT = fullwebr&C21COM = S&S21CNR = 20&S21P01 = 0&S21P02 = 0&S21P03 = A=&S21COLORTERMS = 1&S21STR = %D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%87%D1%83%D0%BA%20%D0%A1.%D0%9A$.

  • Bennett, C.J. and Howlett M. (1992) ‘The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change’, Policy Sciences 25(3): 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N.W.H. (2000) Designing social research: the logic of anticipation, Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrás, S. (2011) ‘Policy learning and organisational capacities in innovation policies’, Science and Public Policy 38(9): 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, P. 2007 ‘Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: crafting a wider lens’, Educational Researcher 36(2): 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2011) ‘The New British policy style: from a British to a Scottish political tradition? The New British policy style’, Political Studies Review 9(2): 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakroun, B. (2010) ‘National qualification frameworks: from policy borrowing to policy learning’, European Journal of Education 45(2): 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. (2011) ‘Ping pong: competing leadership for reform in EU higher education 1998–2006’, European Journal of Education 46(1): 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doctoral school at Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2010) Retrieved 18 December 2018, from https://www.ukma.edu.ua/index.php/science/gradschool.

  • Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance 13(1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EACEA (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency), National TEMPUS Office and Shytikova, S. (2012) Higher education in Ukraine, Brussels: EACEA Retrieved 18 December 2018 from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus/participating_countries/overview/ukraine_tempus_country_fiche_final.pdf.

  • Enders, J. (2004) ‘Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: recent developments and challenges to governance theory’, Higher Education 47(3): 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finikov, T. (ed.) (2012) Vhodzhennya natsionalnoyi systemy vyshchoyi osvity v Yevropeiskyi prostir vyshchoyi isvity ta naukovoho doslidzhennya [The integration of the national system of higher education into the European space of higher education and research], Kyiv: Takson. Retrieved 18 December 18 from http://www.edupolicy.org.ua/files/Analit12_ua_.pdf.

  • Freeman, R. 2006. ‘learning in public policy, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Freeman, R. (2007) ‘epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning’, Administration and Society 39(4): 476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J. and Loeber, A. (2007) ‘Theories of policy learning: agency, structure, and change’, in F. Fischer, G. Miller and M.S. Sidney (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor and Francis, pp. 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (2004) ‘When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilla, T. and Gerlak, A.K. (2013) ‘Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: lessons for public policy scholars: lessons for public policy scholars’, Policy Studies Journal 41(3): 484–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J., Eisend, M. and Petermann, A. (2009) ‘Path dependence in decision-making processes: exploring the impact of complexity under increasing returns’, BuR - Business Research 2(1): 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, V., Nikolajenko, S., Stepko, M. and European Centre for Higher Education (UNESCO-CEPES) (2006) Higher education in Ukraine, Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, B. and Alexiadou, N. (2010) ‘Policy learning and governance of education policy in the EU’, Journal of Education Policy 25(4): 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2010) ‘An epidemic of education policy: (what) can we learn from each other?’, Comparative Education 34(2): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010) ‘Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling’, Critical Studies in Education 51(2): 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering institutions: the organisational basis of politics, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. and Sharman, J.C. (2009) ‘Policy diffusion and policy transfer’, Policy Studies 30(3): 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, P. (1992) ‘Policy learning and failure’, Journal of Public Policy 12(4): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S.B. (2009) Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011) ‘Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation’, Progress in Human Geography 35(6): 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyykkö, R. (2008) ‘Bachelors for Europe, specialisty for the fatherland: Bologna through Russian eyes’, Slavica Helsingiensia 35: 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. and Dunlop, C.A. (2013) ‘Learning in the European Union: theoretical lenses and meta-theory’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): 923–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffe, D. and Semple, S. (2011) Policy borrowing or policy learning?: How (not) to improve education systems, Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I. (2012) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (3rd ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, S. (1999) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment’, in P.A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 117–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A. (2010) ‘Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism’, European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2002) ‘Reterritorialising educational import: explorations into the politics of educational borrowing’, in A. Nóvoa and M. Lawn (eds.) Fabricating Europe. The Formation of an Education Space, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004) ‘Conclusion: blazing a trail for policy theory and practice’, in The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2006) ‘The economics of policy borrowing and lending: a study of late adopters’, Oxford Review of Education 32(5): 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2012) ‘Transfer and translation of policy’, Policy Studies 33(6): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talanova, Z. (2014) ‘Vprovadzhennya tryoh tsykliv vyshchoyi osvity [The implementation of three cycles of higher education]’, in V. Luhovy and S. Kalashnikova (eds.) Pravovi zasadu realizaciyi Bologskogo Protsesu v Ukrayini [Legal basis of the implementation of the Bologna Process in Ukraine], Kyiv: DP NVTS Prioritety, pp. 25–35. Retrieved 18 December 18 from http://www.irf.ua/knowledgebase/publications/pravovi_zasadi_realizatsii_bolonskogo_protsesu_v_ukraini/.

  • Thelen, K. (2003) ‘How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2001) ‘Introduction: Higher Education Policy, Institutional Change’, Higher Educational Policy and Institutional Change: Intentions and Outcomes in Turbulent Environments, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 13–35.

  • Wolczuk, K. (2009) ‘Implementation without coordination: the impact of EU conditionality on Ukraine under the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Europe-Asia Studies 61(2): 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarkin, M.J. (2008) ‘Organisational learning in novel policy situations: two cases of United states communications regulation’, Policy Studies 29(1): 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the University of Edinburgh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iryna Kushnir.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

List of policy documents

List of interviewees

  1. 1.

    Higher education reform expert at the National TEMPUS office, instructor at higher education institution A;

  2. 2.

    National TEMPUS Office representative;

  3. 3.

    Ex-member of a working group of the Parliamentary Committee of Education and Science Matters, ex-member of the Bologna Follow-up Group, head of department at higher education institution B;

  4. 4.

    Representative of the Fund Demokratychni Initsiatyvy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kushnir, I. Policy Learning in the Development of Bologna Study Cycles in Ukraine. High Educ Policy 34, 277–296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00133-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00133-x

Keywords

Navigation