Skip to main content
Log in

A critique of new materialism: ethics and ontology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article seeks to offer a critical assessment of the conception of ethics underlying the growing constellation of ‘new materialist’ social theories. It argues that such theories offer little if any purchase in understanding the contemporary transformations of relations between mind and body or human and non-human natures. Taking as exemplary the work of Jane Bennett, Rosi Braidotti, and Karen Barad, this article asserts that a continuity between ethics and ontology is central to recent theories of ‘materiality’. These theories assert the primacy of matter by calling upon a spiritual or ascetic self-transformation so that one might be ‘attuned to’ or ‘register’ materiality and, conversely, portray critique as hubristic, conceited, or resentful, blinded by its anthropocentrism. It is argued that framing the grounds for ontological speculation in these ethical terms licences the omission of analysis of social forces mediating thought’s access to the world and so grants the theorist leave to sidestep any questions over the conditions of thought. In particular, the essay points to ongoing processes of the so-called primitive accumulation as constituting the relationship between mind and body, human and non-human natures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. (2003) The Jargon of Authenticity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amani, B. and Coombe, R.J. (2005) The Human Genome Diversity Project: The politics of patents at the intersection of race, religion, and research ethics. Law and Policy 27(1): 152–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachram, H. (2004) Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nature Socialism 15(4): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. (2006) My self and my own: One and the same?. In: B. Maurer and G. Schwab (eds.) Accelerating Possession: Global Futures of Property and Personhood. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. (2013) Identity and Difference: John Locke and the Invention of Consciousness. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandar, B. (2014) Critical legal studies and the politics of property. Property Law Review 3: 186–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. (2008) Biosociality and biocrossings: Encounters with assisted conception and embryonic stem cells in India. In: S. Gibbon and C. Novas (eds.) Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2001) The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, S. and Dabhi, S. (2009) Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFly Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. (2008) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Knowledge Commons. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

  • Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Cambridge: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2002) Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006) Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassier, R. (2011) Concept and objects. In: G. Harman, L. Bryant, N. Srnicek (eds.) The Speculative Turn. Melbourne: Re-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, U. and Gorg, C. (2008) Post-fordist governance of nature: The internationalisation of the state and the case of genetic resources. Review of International Political Economy 15(4): 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2014) The biopolitics of unwaged digital labor. Triple C 12(2): 464–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2008) Sovereignty and the return of the repressed. In: D. Campbell and M. Schoolman (eds.) The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Bryant, L., Harman, G. and Srnicek, N. (eds.) (2011) The Speculative Turn. Melbourne: Re-Press.

  • Caffentzis, G. (1989) Clipped Coins, Abused Words, and Civil Government: John Locke’s Philosophy of Money. New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffentzis, G. (2008) John Locke: The Philosopher of Primitive Accumulation. Bristol: Bristol Radical History Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletti, L. (1972) From Rousseau to Lenin: Studies in Ideology and Society. London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D. and Frost, S. (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democractic Activism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2007) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. and Waldby, C. (2014) Clinical Labour: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

  • Davis, A. (1982) Women, Race, and Class. Women's Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2007) Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, D. (2009) Body Shopping: The Economy Fuelled by Flesh and Blood. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphijn, R. and I. van der Tuin (eds.) (2012) New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

  • Dyer-Witherford, N (2015) Cyber-Proletariat. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2004) Caliban and the Witch: The Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felski, R. (2000) Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York: NYU Press.

  • Foucault, M. (2013) History of Madness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., Lury, C. and Stacey, J. (2000) Global Nature, Global Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S. (2011) The implications of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology In: H. Grasswick (ed.) Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–83.

  • Fuchs, C. (2007) Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.

  • Goldstein, J. (2013) Terra Economica: Waste and the production of nature. Antipode 45(2): 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (ed.) (2015) The Non-Human Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) Basic Writings. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Helmreich, S (2009) Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2005) Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies 19(5): 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2010) On reading “Transpositions”: A response to Rosi Braidotti’s. Transpositions: on Nomadic Ethics. Subjectivity 3.2: 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince, O.U. (2011) ‘Enclosing in God’s name, accumulation for mankind: Money, morality, and accumulation in John Locke’s theory of property. Review of Politics 73: 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2005) Cultural political economy, the knowledge-based economy, and the state. In: A. Barry and D. Slater (eds.) The Technological Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 144–166.

  • Johnston, A. (2012) Thinking Big: Toward Grand Neuropolitics - or, Why I am not an Imminent Naturalist or Vital Materialist. In: F Vander Valk (ed.) Essays on Neuroscience and Political Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 156–177.

  • Katz, C. (1998) Whose nature, whose culture? Private productions of space and the preservation of nature. In: B. Braun and N. Castree (eds.) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996) Immaterial labour. In: P. Virno and M. Hardt (eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37(3): 434–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1993) Locke: Political Writings. D. Wooton (ed.), Chicago: Hackett.

  • Lohmann, L. (2009) Neoliberalism and the calculable world: The rise of carbon trading. In: Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: Mayfly books, pp. 25–40.

  • Marx, K. (1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, trans. by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.

  • Marx, K. (1993) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, trans. by Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin.

  • McAfee, K. (2003) Neoliberalism on the molecular scale: Economic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum 34: 203–219.

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2012a) There is contingent being independent of us, and this contingent being has no reason to be a subject nature. In: Rick Dolphijn and Iris van der Tuin, New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2012b) Iteration, reiteration, repetition: A speculative analysis of the meaningless sign. Paper delivered to the Freie Universitat Berlin, April 2012 [available at http://oursecretblog.com/txt/QMpaperApr12.pdf]. Accessed 08/09/2014.  

  • Mies, M. (1998) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women and the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2011) Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2008) Chemical regimes of life. Journal of Environmental History 13(4): 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2011) War on waste: Law, Original accumulation and the violence of capital. Science and Society 75(4): 506–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noys, B. (2011) The Discrete Charm of Bruno Latour, or the Critique of “Anti-Critique”. Paper presented to the Centre for Critical Theory, University of Nottingham, December 8, 2011. [https://www.academia.edu/1477950/The_Discreet_Charm_of_Bruno_Latour_or_the_critique_of_anti-critique_] Accessed 31/10/2015.

  • Noys, B. (2012) The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, B. (2004) Trading the Genome. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, D. (1999) On the strangeness of intellectuals and the intellectuality of strangers. Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A. (2009) ‘Capitalizing disease: Biopolitics of drug trials in India’. Theory, Culture & Society 26(5): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, K.S. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Post-Genomic Life. London and Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Rajan, K.S. (2012) Pharmaceutical crises and questions of value: Terrains and logics of global therapeutic politics. South Atlantic Quarterly 111(2): 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekret, P. (forthcoming) New materialisms and the politics of knowledge. Theory, Culture and Society in press.

  • Rekret, P. and Choat, S. (2015) From political topographies to political logics: Post-marxism and historicity. Constellations: A Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, advance publication 4 December, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12199.

  • Rekret, P. (2012) The impasse of post-metaphysical political theory: On Derrida and Foucault. Telos 161: 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. (1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H and Rose, S. (2014) Genes, Cells and Brains: The Promethean Promises of the New Biotechnology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D. (2000) Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

  • Schiller, D. (2007) How to Think About Information. Urbana and Chicago: University of Chicago press.

  • Schmidt, A. (1971) The Concept of Nature in Marx. (Ben Fowkes, Trans.). London: New Left Books.

  • Smith, N. (2007) Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register. 43: 16–36.

  • Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978) Intellectual and Manual Labor: A Critique of Epistemology. London: MacMillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sourbut, E. (1997) Reproductive technologies and lesbian parents: An unnatural alliance. In: M. Maynard (ed.) Science and the Construction of Women London: University College Press.

  • Terranova, T. (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age (Vol. 23, p. 25). London: Pluto Press.

  • Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.   

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, A. (2008) The culture of abstraction. Theory, Culture and Society 25(4): 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker E (2005) The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics and Culture. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2003) A Grammar of the Multitude. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext (e).

  • Waldby, C. (2002) Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6(3): 305–323.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C. and Mitchell, T. (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. London and Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Whatmore, S. (2002) Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2013) Materiality, form, and context: Marx contra Latour. Victorian Studies 55(4): 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1980) ‘Ideas of Nature’, Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E.M. (2002), The Origins of Capitalism: A Longer View. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, C. (2008) From the gene to the globe: extracting rents based on intellectual property monopolies. Review of International Political Economy 15(1): 86–115.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Rekret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rekret, P. A critique of new materialism: ethics and ontology. Subjectivity 9, 225–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0001-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0001-y

Keywords

Navigation