Skip to main content
Log in

Bureaucratically distorted communication: The case of managed mental health care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Theory & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mental health treatment providers today are subject to insurance company regulation. Using grounded theory to analyze 33 interviews of treatment providers, I portray this regulation as a form of surveillance that operates through discourse, and ask how treatment providers communicate with and through this system. My findings reveal that mental health treatment providers are required to deliver information to insurers within a rationalized medical discourse that is supposed to represent treatment, but is inadequate for the task. I argue this bureaucratic system demands that providers communicate with insurers in a distorted way. These findings are theorized in dialogue with Habermas’ communication typology and his theory of lifeworld colonization. I argue that the case of managed mental health care presents an arena of communication and colonization which is best suited by building from the Habermasian framework. Colonization occurs, yet on within a specific channel of communication, despite pretensions of thoroughgoing colonization. Systematically generated communicative distortions occur, but often without necessarily involving self-deceptions or strategic private agendas. This paper contributes to Habermasian theory by suggesting it could be further elaborated upon to account in for forms of colonization and distorted communication that occur in varied social contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T.W. (1973) Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (1999) Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies 47(2): 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E. and Jonsson, S. (2008) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 78–98). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Charmaz, K. and Bryant, A. (2007) The coding process and its challenges. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

  • Collinson, D. (2014) Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership 10(1): 36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1992) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978) Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1982) Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, M.J. and Gray, B.H. (1989) Controlling Costs and Changing Patient Care? The Role of Utilization Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1988) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1970) On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry 13, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.K. and Flyverbom, M. (2015) The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization 22(6): 872–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. and Rhodes, C. (2010) The undecided space of ethics in organizational surveillance. Organization Studies 31(2): 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (2007) Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F. (1988) The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (1981) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Boston: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, J.B. and Stoeckle, J.D. (1988) Corporatization and the social transformation of doctoring. International Journal of Health Services 18(2): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M. (2010) Sampling in grounded theory. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 229–244). London: Sage.

  • Orton, J.D. and Weick, K. (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. and Walczak, D. (1988) Rationalization and the deprofessionalization of physicians. Social Forces 67(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L. (2008) Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Scheid, T.L. (2003) Managed care and the rationalization of mental health services. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44(2): 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, M.J., Gray, B.H. and Perreira, K.M. (1997) Medical professionalism under managed care: The pros and cons of utilization review. Health Affairs 16(1): 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P.J. and Caronna, C.A. (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S. and Kolker, E.S. (2004) Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45(Extra Issue): 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, S. (2003) A failed panopticon: Surveillance of nursing practice via new technology. New Technology, Work and Employment 18(2): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, N.C., Lachicotte, W.S., Kirschner, S.R., Cortes, D.E. and Good, B.J. (2000) Clinician experiences of managed mental health care: A rereading of the threat. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14(1): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whooley, O. (2010) Diagnostic ambivalence: Psychiatric workarounds and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Sociology of Health & Illness 32(3): 452–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremiah C. Morelock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morelock, J.C. Bureaucratically distorted communication: The case of managed mental health care. Soc Theory Health 14, 436–457 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-016-0015-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-016-0015-0

Keywords

Navigation