Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating and forecasting portfolio’s Value-at-Risk with wavelet-based extreme value theory: Evidence from crude oil prices and US exchange rates

  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This article proposes a wavelet-based extreme value theory (W-EVT) approach to estimate and forecast portfolio’s Value-at-Risk (VaR) given the stylized facts and complex structure of financial data. Our empirical application to portfolios of crude oil prices and US dollar exchange rates shows that the W-EVT models provide an effective and powerful tool for gauging extreme moments and improving the accuracy of portfolio’s VaR estimates and forecasts after noise is removed from the original data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a related study, Reboredo and Rivera-Castro (2013) use a DWT approach to examine the relationship between oil prices and US dollar exchange rates over different time scales. They find evidence of no dependence between the variables of interest in the pre-crisis period, but evidence of contagion and negative dependence after the onset of the crisis. Our study thus differs from Reboredo and Rivera-Castro (2013) in that we focus on the underlying relationships between oil prices and exchange rates in the presence of extreme values and after noise removal.

  2. The “optimum” value of the threshold level, is calculated according to Donoho (1995) as λ = \( \sqrt {2\log \left( T \right)} \sigma^{2} \) where T is the length of the decomposed vector, and σ 2 the variance of the noise, which is estimated from the variance of the detailed coefficients at the first decomposition level.

  3. The results regarding the descriptive statistics can be made available on request.

  4. The parameter estimates of the three tests were obtained via the maximum-likelihood method. The acceptance and rejection of the p value were compared to the critical values at 10, 5 and 1 % levels. All the test estimates were obtained by easy-fit software.

  5. The portfolio’s return is computed according to Eq. (12). The results of the distribution choice for portfolios are available on request.

References

  • Aguiar-Conraria L and Soares MJ (2011). Business cycle synchronization and the Euro: A wavelet analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics 33(3):477-489.

  • Aguiar-Conraria L and Soares MJ (2013). The continuous wavelet transform: Moving beyond uni and bivariate analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys 28(2):344–375.

  • Akram QF (2009). Commodity prices, interest rates and the dollar. Energy Economics 31(6):838–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloui R, Ben Aïssa MS and Nguyen DK (2011). Global financial crisis, extreme interdependences, and contagion effects: The role of economic structure? Journal of Banking and Finance 35(1):130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloui R, Ben Aïssa MS and Nguyen DK (2013). Conditional dependence structure between oil prices and exchange rates: A copula-GARCH approach. Journal of International Money and Finance 32(February):719–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amano R and van Norden S (1998). Oil prices and the rise and fall of the US real exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance 17(2):299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amira K, Taamouti A and Tsafack G (2011). What drives international equity correlations? Volatility or market direction? Journal of International Money and Finance 30(6):1234–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au S, Duan R, Hesar S and Jiang W (2010). A framework of irregularity enlightenment for data pre-processing in data mining. Annals of Operations Research 174(1):47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkema A and de Haan L (1974). Residual life time at great age. Annals of Probability 2(5):792–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1996). Supervisory framework for the use of “backtesting” in conjunction with the internal model-based approach to market risk capital requirements. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SS and Chen HC (2007). Oil prices and real exchange rates. Energy Economics 29(3):390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifter A (2011). Value-at-risk estimation with wavelet-based extreme value theory: Evidence from emerging markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390(12):2356–2367.

  • Craigmile PF and Percival DB (2005). Asymptotic decorrelation of between-scale wavelet coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 51(3):1039–1048.

  • Donoho DL (1995). Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 41(3):613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S (2011). Examining crude oil price—exchange rate nexus for India during the period of extreme oil price volatility. Applied Energy 88(5):1886–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haven E, Liu X and Shen L (2012). D-noising options prices with the wavelet method. European Journal of Operational Research 222(1):104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Xie C, Chen S and Lai KK (2009). Estimating VaR in crude oil market: A novel multi-scale non-linear ensemble approach incorporating wavelet analysis and neural network. Neurocomputing 72(16–18):3428–3438.

  • He K, Lai KK and Xiang G (2012). Portfolio Value at Risk estimate for crude oil markets: A multivariate wavelet denoising approach. Energies 5(12):1018–1043.

  • Kupiec P (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk management models. Journal of Derivatives 3(2):73–84.

  • Longin F, Solnik B (2001). Extreme correlation of international equity markets. Journal of Finance 56(2):649–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil A, and Frey R (2000). Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 7(3–4):271–300.

  • Murtagh F, Starck JL and Renaud O (2004). On neuro-wavelet modeling. Decision Support Systems 37(4):475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickands J (1975). Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Annals of Statistics 3(1):119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plourde A and Watkins GC (1998). Crude oil prices between 1985 and 1994: How volatile in relation to other commodities? Resource and Energy Economics 20(3):245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reboredo JC and Rivera-Castro MA (2013). A wavelet decomposition approach to crude oil price and exchange rate dependence. Economic Modelling 32(May):42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnier E (2007). Oil and energy price volatility. Energy Economics 29(3):405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2000). The empirical relationship between energy futures prices and exchange rates. Energy Economics 22(2):253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun ES and Meinl T (2012). A new wavelet-based denoising algorithm for high-frequency financial data mining. European Journal of Operational Research 217(3):589–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C-C, Chung H and Chang Y-H (2012). The economic value of co-movement between oil price and exchange rate using copula-based GARCH models. Energy Economics 34(1):270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yogo M (2008). Measuring business cycles: A wavelet analysis of economic time series. Economics Letters 100(2):208–212.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duc Khuong Nguyen.

Additional information

The online version of this article is available Open Access

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jammazi, R., Nguyen, D.K. Estimating and forecasting portfolio’s Value-at-Risk with wavelet-based extreme value theory: Evidence from crude oil prices and US exchange rates. J Oper Res Soc 68, 1352–1362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0133-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0133-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation