Abstract
In our rapidly changing world, we are often encouraged to treat our bodies as objects of constant improvement by means of various facilities and innovations. As part of this “Promethean tendency,” the present-day alliance between medicine and technology has opened up a new perspective on the ill and disabled body, by providing access to sophisticated prosthetics that are increasingly seen as ideal remedies. These devices allow patients to benefit from previously unimaginable treatments and inestimable scientific advances, yet they also create new forms of dependency that go beyond simply forming a habit. They are part of a complex process which results in the construction of a body full of paradoxes and whose effects go beyond the subject’s image construction. Based on the case of Mathilde, a little girl with a partial arm agenesis, the author traces some elements of the psychic process of constructing a body: from a congenital malformation towards a body “supplemented” by a prosthesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cotard, J., Camuset, M., & Seglas, J. (1880). Du délire des négations aux idées d’énormité [The pleasure of negating ideas of enormity]. Republished: Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997.
Dauphin, V. B., & Abell, S. (2010). Infinite adolescence: A psychoanalytic exploration of tantalizing promises inherent to the Singularily. Psychoanalytic Review, 97, 579–605.
Freud, S. (1900). Das Traummaterial und die Traumquellen. Gesammelte Werke, 2 & 3, 169–282. In English: The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, Vol 4–5, pp. 1–626. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition, 7, 123–246.
Freud, S. (1906). Psychopathic characters on the stage. Standard Edition, 7, 303–310.
Freud, S. (1912–1913). Totem and taboo. Standard Edition, 13, vii–162.
Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism. Standard Edition, 14, 67–102.
Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. Standard Edition, 14, 109–140.
Freud, S. (1919). The ‘uncanny’. Standard Edition, 17, 217–256.
Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard Edition, 18, 65–144.
Freud, S. (1932). The acquisition and control of fire. Standard Edition, 22, 183–194.
Kurzweil, R. (2006). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
Lacan J. (1955–1956). Le séminaire. Livre III, Les psychoses. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 1992.
McDougall, J. (1982). La néo-séxualité en scéne. In Théâtres du Je (pp. 209–224). Paris: Gallimard.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Orfanos, S. D. (2006). Mythos and logos. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 481–499.
Spitz, E. H. (1994). Promethean positions. In P. L. Rudnytsky & E. H. Spitz (Eds.), Freud and forbidden knowledge (pp. 26–41). New York: New York University Press.
Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1978). Faces in the cloud: Subjectivity in personality theory. New York: Jason Aronson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by Kristina Valendinova
Address correspondence to Dr. Cristina Lindenmeyer, 44 rue de Sévigné, 75003 Paris, France.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindenmeyer, C. The agenetic body: prosthetics or the new Promethean ideal. Am J Psychoanal 76, 255–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9043-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9043-8