Skip to main content
Log in

An End to Perinatal HIV: Success in the US Requires Ongoing and Innovative Efforts that Should Expand Globally

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dramatic reduction of perinatally transmitted HIV in the United States has been a striking success story in the HIV epidemic. Routine HIV screening during pregnancy followed by appropriate therapy has been extremely effective. This paper puts forth three strategies needed to maintain these gains and reach the goal of eliminating perinatal HIV: standardize medical interventions and policy changes that support perinatal HIV reduction; institute HIV screening in routine preconception care to identify HIV infection in women before pregnancy; and critically focus attention and resources on primary prevention of HIV infection in women. Healthcare providers should incorporate HIV prevention education and routine screening into women's primary health care. Public health leaders should support and fund prevention strategies directed at young women. Successful approaches that have nearly eliminated perinatal HIV transmission in the United States offer valuable lessons that should be applied to primary HIV prevention for women in the United States and globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report 2005, Vol. 17. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports, accessed 12 February 2007.

  • Public Health Service Task Force. Recommendations for use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-1-Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission in the United States, Available at: www.Aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines, accessed 20 July 2006.

  • Santora M . U.S. is close to eliminating AIDS in infants, officials say. The New York Times, 2005. January 5; P. A:1.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advancing HIV prevention: new strategies for a changing epidemic—United States, 2003. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52 (15):329–332.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents and pregnant women in health care settings. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55 (RR-14):1–17.

  • American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Joint Statement on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening. ACOG Policy Statement 75. Elk Grove Village: AAP; Washington, DC: ACOG; 1999 (reaffirmed by AAP, September 2005; ACOG, July 2006).

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prenatal and Perinatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing: Expanded recommendations. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 304. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2004.

  • Institute of Medicine. Reducing the Odds: Preventing Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

  • Paltiel D, Weinstein WC, Kimmel AD, Seage GR, Losina E, Zhang H, et al. Expanded screening for HIV in the United States – an analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Eng J Med. 2005;352:586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immergluck LC, Cull WL, Schwartz A, Elstein AS . Cost-effectiveness of universal compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant women in Chicago. Pediatrics. 2000;105:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnham PG, Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, Johnson-Masotti AP . Cost-effectiveness of counseling and testing to prevent sexual transmission of HIV in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2002;6:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsky RD, Farnham PG, Straus WL, Caldwell B, Holtgrave DR, Simonds RJ, et al. Preventing perinatal transmission of HIV – costs and effectiveness of a recommended intervention. Public Health Rep. 1996;111 (4):335–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States a report of the CDC/ATSDR preconception care work group and the select panel on preconception care. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55 (RR6):1.

  • Birkhead GS, Tesoiero J, Warren B, Wade N . Letter to the editor: Re “named reporting and mandatory partner notification in New York State: The effect of consent for perinatal HIV testing. J Urban Health. 2003;80:167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illinois General Assembly. Public Act 939-0566. An Act in Relation to Health. Illinois: General Assembly, 2003. Available at http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/93/093-0566.htm; Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 410, Part 355, Section 10 10. Perinatal HIV prevention act. Illinois: General Assembly, 2006. Available at www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs.

  • Anderson JE, Koenig LJ, Lampe MA, Wright R, Leiss J, Saul J . Achieving universal HIV screening in prenatal care in the United States: provider persistence pays off. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005;9:247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce RA, Walter EB, Fernandez MI, Wilson TE, Ickovics JR, Simonds RJ . Perinatal guidelines evaluation project barriers to universal prenatal HIV testing in 4 US locations in 1997. Am J Public Health. 2001;92:727–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau ST, Jerome J, Miller K, Monk E, Garcia P, Cohen M . Mothers on the margins: implications for eradicating perinatal HIV. Soc Sci Med. 2005;62:59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation. Women and HIV/AIDS in the United States. HIV/AIDS Policy Fact Sheet. Available at www.kff.org, accessed November 2005.

  • Kaiser Family Foundation. The HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the United States. HIV/AIDS Policy Fact Sheet. Available at www.kff.org, accessed February 2006.

  • National center for health statistics. Deaths: leading causes for 2002. National Vital Statistics Report. 2005;53 (17):32.

  • UNAIDS. 2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Available at http://www.unaids.org/en/HIV_data/default.asp, accessed 20 July 2006.

  • Wenzel SL, Tucker JS . Reemphasizing the context of women' risk for HIV/AIDS in the United States. Women's Health Issues. 2005;15:154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikutu BO, Stone VE . Women, inequality, and the burden of HIV. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemmott J, Lemmott LS, Braverman P, Fong G . HIV/STD risk reduction interventions for African American and Latino adolescent girls at an adolescent medicine clinic. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Harrington KF, Lang DL, Davies SL, Hook EW, et al. Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls. JAMA. 2004;292:171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar LF, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby RA, Harrington K, Davies S, et al. Self-concept and adolescents' refusal of unprotected sex: a test of mediating mechanisms among African American girls. Prev Sci. 2004;137–149.

  • Rotheram-Borus MJ, Gwadz M, Fernandez MI, Srinivasan S . Timing of HIV interventions on reductions in sexual risk among adolescents. Am J Community Psychol. 1998;26:73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles CM, Kay LS, Crepaz N, Herbst J, Passin WF, Kim AS, et al. Best-evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000-2004. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact sheet: HIV/AIDS Among Women. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/women.htm, accessed 12 February 2007.

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Primary and Preventive Care: Periodic Assessments. ACOG Committee Opinion 357. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2006. 2–4.

  • The White House. Fact sheet: continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS in America February 1, 2001. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/02/print/20060210-10.html, accessed 20 July 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn K Burr.

Additional information

The dramatic reduction of perinatally transmitted HIV in the U.S. has been a striking success story in the HIV epidemic. The authors propose strategies to maintain these gains and reach the goal of eliminating perinatal HIV in the USA using routine HIV screening during pregnancy followed by appropriate therapy that has been extremely effective. They offer lessons for primary HIV prevention for women worldwide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burr, C., Lampe, M., Corle, S. et al. An End to Perinatal HIV: Success in the US Requires Ongoing and Innovative Efforts that Should Expand Globally. J Public Health Pol 28, 249–260 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200126

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200126

Keywords

Navigation