Abstract
The problem of candidate selection is central to the development of political parties and is a critical feature of France's candidate-centred presidential polity. Reflecting on the political opportunity structure and cleavage basis that arose from the dramatic outcome of the 2002 elections, this paper explores the 2007 presidential nominations of the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire and the Parti Socialiste. The focus is on the expected-utility calculus of candidate viability by party members in relation to membership growth and the ascent of mass contingents of ‘instant’ newcomers in both parties. The analysis points out diverging strategies of presidential communication in Sarkozy and Royal, which enacted two definable symbolic trajectories of ideological revision in their respective camps. These differences are addressed in the light of each candidate's intra-party positioning and their relation to organized factions. This review looks simultaneously at how presidential strategies were articulated with party leadership.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A. and Cukierman, A. (1990) ‘The politics of ambiguity’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105 (4): 829–850.
Appleton, A.M. and Ward, D.S. (1997) ‘Party response to environmental change: a model of organizational innovation’, Party Politics, 3 (3): 341–362.
Barker, D.C. (2005) ‘Values, frames, and persuasion in presidential nomination campaigns’, Political Behavior, 27 (4): 375–394.
Barker, D.C., Lawrence, A.B. and Tavits, M. (2006) ‘Partisanship and the dynamics of “candidate centered politics” in American presidential nominations’, Electoral Studies, 25: 599–610.
Bartels, L.M. (1988) Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bell, D. and Criddle, B. (2002) ‘Presidentialism restored: the French elections of April–May and June 2002’, Parliamentary Affairs, 55: 643–663.
Bergounioux, A. and Grunberg, G. (2005) L'ambition et le remords. les socialistes français et le pouvoir. 1905–2005, Paris: Fayard Coll. L'espace du politique.
Carty, R.K. and Blake, D.E. (1999) ‘The adoption of membership votes for choosing party leaders: the experience of Canadian parties’, Party Politics, 5 (2): 211–224.
Cautrès, B. and Mayer, N. (eds.) (2004) Le nouveau désordre electoral. Les leçons du 21 avril 2002, Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
Clift, B. (2005) ‘Dyarchic presidentialization in a presidentialized polity: the French fifth republic’, in P. Webb and T. Poguntke (eds.) The Presidentialization of Politics — A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–243.
Cole, A.M. (1989) ‘Factionalism, the French socialist party and the fifth republic: an explanation of intra-party divisions’, European Journal of Political Research, 17 (1): 77–94.
Culpepper, P.D., Hall, P.A. and Palier, B. (eds.) (2006) Changing France: The Politics that Markets Make, French politics, society and culture series, Basingstoke, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Denord, F. (2004) ‘La conversion au néo-libéralisme. Droite et libéralisme économique dans les années 1980’, Mouvements, 35: 17–23.
Gaffney, J. (2003) ‘The French fifth republic as an opportunity structure: a neo-institutional and cultural approach to the study of leadership politics’, Political Studies, 51 (4): 686–705.
Grunberg, G. and Laïdi, Z. (2007) Sortir du pessimisme social. Essai sur l'identité de la gauche, Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
Haegel, F. (2004) ‘The transformation of the French right: institutional imperatives and organizational changes’, French Politics, 2 (2): 185–202.
Haegel, F. (ed.) (2007) Partis politiques et système partisan en France, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, Références-Fait politique.
Haegel, F., Pütz, C. and Sauger, N. (2003) ‘Les transformations de la démocratie dans et par les partis: l'exemple de l'UDF et du RPR’, in P. Perrineau (ed.) Le désenchantement démocratique, Paris: La Tour d'Aigues, Editions de l'Aube, pp. 175–198.
Harmel, R. and Janda, K. (1994) ‘An integrated theory of party goals and party change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6: 259–287.
Ivaldi, G. (2006) ‘Beyond France's 2005 referendum on the European constitutional treaty: second-order model, anti-establishment attitudes and the end of the alternative European utopia’, West European Politics, 29 (1): 47–69.
Katz, R.S. (2001) ‘The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy’, Party Politics, 7 (3): 277–296.
Kenney, P.J. and Rice, T.W. (1994) ‘The psychology of political momentum’, Political Research Quarterly, 47 (4): 923–938.
Knapp, A. (2004) Parties and the Party System in France: A disconnected Democracy?, Basingstoke, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
LeDuc, L. (2001) ‘Democratizing party leadership selection’, Party Politics, 7 (3): 323–341.
Lefebvre, R. and Sawiki, F. (2006) La société des socialistes. le PS aujourd'hui, Paris: Le Croquant.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. (ed.) (2004) The French Voter: Before and After 2002, Basingstoke, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McCann, J.A., Partin, R.W., Rapoport, R.B. and Stone, W.J. (1996) ‘Presidential nomination campaigns and party mobilization: an assessment of spillover effects’, American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3): 756–767.
Meirowitz, A. (2005) ‘Informational party primaries and strategic ambiguity’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17 (1): 107–136.
Meunier, S. (2004) ‘Globalization and Europeanization: a challenge to French politics’, French Politics, 2 (August): 125–150.
Olivier, L. (2003) ‘Ambiguïtés de la démocratisation partisane en France (PS, RPR, UMP)’, Revue française de science politique, 53 (5, October): 761–790.
Rohde, D.W. (1979) ‘Risk-bearing and progressive ambition: the case of members of the united states house of representatives’, American Journal of Political Science, 23 (1): 1–26.
Rowland, R.C. and Jones, J. (2001) ‘Entelechial and reformative symbolic trajectories in contemporary conservatism: a case study of Reagan and Buchanan in Houston and beyond’, Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 4 (1): 55–84.
Saglie, J. and Heidar, K. (2004) ‘Democracy within Norwegian political parties. Complacency or pressure for change?’ Party Politics, 10 (4): 385–405.
Scarrow, S.E. (1999) ‘Parties and the expansion of direct democracy. Who benefits?’ Party Politics, 5 (3): 341–362.
Seyd, P. (1999) ‘New parties/new politics? A case study of the British labour party’, Party Politics, 5 (3): 383–405.
Søberg Shugart, M. (2005) ‘Semi-presidential systems: dual executive and mixed authority patterns’, French Politics, 3 (3): 323–351.
Southwell, P.L. (1986) ‘The politics of disgruntlement: nonvoting and defection among supporters of nomination losers, 1968–1984’, Political Behavior, 8 (1): 81–95.
Stone, W.J. and Maisel, L.S. (2003) ‘The not-so-simple calculus of winning: potential U.S. house candidates' nomination and general election prospects’, Journal of Politics, 65 (4): 951–977.
Stone, W.J., Rapoport, R.B. and Atkeson, L.R. (1995) ‘A simulation model of presidential nomination choice’, American Journal of Political Science, 39 (1): 135–161.
Vedel, T. (2007) Comment devient-on président(e) de la République? Les stratégies des candidats, Paris: Robert Laffont.
Wahl, N. and Quermonne, J.-L. (eds.) (1995) La France présidentielle. L'influence du suffrage universel sur la vie politique, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Young, L. and Cross, W. (2002) ‘The rise of plebiscitary democracy in Canadian political parties’, Party Politics, 8 (6): 673–699.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivaldi, G. Presidential Strategies, Models of Leadership and the Development of Parties in a Candidate-Centred Polity: The 2007 UMP and PS Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Fr Polit 5, 253–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200131
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200131