Skip to main content
Log in

Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field

  • Debates and Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Dramatic changes in context have occurred over the last 25 years for those of us working in the information systems (IS) field, with ICTs becoming pervasive in many areas of human activity and in all countries of the world. It is ironic that the success of ICTs has led to concerns that the distinct research contribution of the IS field could become lost and that the field itself may decline. The literature over the last decade or so has offered different and sometimes opposing suggestions as to how the field should respond to these concerns. In this paper, I discuss these debates and I use the discussion as a basis for putting forward a skeleton future agenda for the IS field as a whole. This agenda emphasises the need for a focus on ethical goals, increased use of critical approaches, welcoming other disciplines with open arms, widening our field of study to many non-traditional settings and rejecting a dominant methodological paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avgerou, C. (2010). Comments on Allen Lee's Article: ‘Information systems research in the last and next 25 years’ from a socio-theoretical IS research perspective, Journal of Information Technology 25 (4): 355–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. (2011). A Response to the Design-oriented Information Systems Research Memorandum, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, S.C. and Bjørn-Andersen, N. (eds.) (1990). Information Technology in Developing Countries, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W. and Shaw, V. (2007). Developing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries: The flexible standards strategy, MIS Quarterly 31 (2): 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. (2008). The Future of Information Systems – Thinking Informatically, European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6): 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., Land, F. and King, J.L. (2009). Editors’ Introduction – Special Issue on Ethical Issues in IS Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (11): 782–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, I. and Webb, A. (eds.) (2009). African Women and ICTs, Pretoria: Unisa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, V., Lopes, A.B. and Arthur, D. (2010). IT Careers Camp: An early intervention strategy to increase IS enrolments, Information Systems Research 21 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E.J. (2011). ‘Hey Professor, Why are You Teaching This Class?’ Reflection on the Relevance of IS Research for Undergraduate Students, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (2): 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R.M. and Martinsons, M.G. (2011). Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant IS Research: An inclusive-exclusive perspective, Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 288–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. (2003). The Social Life of Information Systems Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7): 360–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J. (2008). Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A review of the literature, The Information Society 24 (3): 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekine, S. (ed.) (2010). SMS Uprising: Mobile Activism in Africa, Cape Town: Pamzabuka Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R.D. (2003). Change as Crisis or Growth? Towards a Trans-disciplinary View of Information Systems as a Field of Study, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (6): 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, G. and Bhattacherjee, A. (2009). Whom Are We Informing? Issues and Recommendations for MIS Research from an Informing Sciences Perspective, MIS Quarterly 33 (2): 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., Straub, D. and Galluch, P. (2009). Turning the Corner: The influence of positive thinking on the information systems field, MIS Quarterly 32 (1): iii–viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2008). The Structure of the IS Discipline Reconsidered: Implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective, Information and Organization 18 (4): 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (2011). IS Research Methods: Inclusive or exclusive? Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 296–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. and King, J.L. (2004). Nothing at the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (6): 220–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraczynski, O. (2009). Exploring the Usage and Impact of ‘Transformational’ Mobile Financial Services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya, Journal of East African Studies 3 (3): 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. (2011). Is There a Methodological Crisis? Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 294–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. and Baskerville, R.L. (2009). Commentary on Gill and Bhattacherjee: Is there an informing crisis? MIS Quarterly 33 (4): 663–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandhakumar, J. and Scarbrough, H. (2011). Open Sources? A commentary on ‘IS Research Methods: Inclusive or exclusive?’ Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 302–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring technology at work, Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1): 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A. and Sinz, E.J. (2011). Memorandum on Design-Oriented Information Systems Research, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2004). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (2003). Identity, Legitimacy and the Dominant Research Paradigm: An alternative prescription for the IS discipline, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7): 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, F. (2010). Valuing Worldwide Diversity in a European Spirit: Being more critical and open, European Journal of Information Systems 19 (5): 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S., Griffiths, M., Light, B. and Lincoln, S. (2011). Guest Editorial: Constructing, deconstructing and negotiating the boundaries of digital cultures, Information Technology and People 24 (1): 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S. and Winter, S.J. (2011). Special Issue on Futures for Research on Information Systems: Prometheus unbound? Journal of Information Technology 26 (2): 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, T. (ed.) (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2001). Making a World of Difference: IT in a global context, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2005). Learning About Being Critical, Information Systems Journal 15 (2): 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Walsham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsham, G. Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. J Inf Technol 27, 87–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4

Keywords

Navigation