Skip to main content
Log in

Signals and international alliance formation: The roles of affiliations and international activities

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends signaling theory to the study of firms’ international alliances. Signals can be valuable in facilitating these collaborations because they reduce the risk of adverse selection surrounding cross-border partnerships. We specifically investigate whether firms’ affiliations with prominent financial intermediaries enable the formation of international collaborative agreements. We also argue and find that the signaling benefits of these affiliations diminish with the firm’s engagement in international activities, which can function as alternative signals by which firms convey the quality of their resources and prospects. Examining firms’ cross-border activities helps to identify new and important signals that are unique to the international setting. Moreover, this also helps contextualize prior theory and findings that exist in the domestic setting on the effects of affiliations with financial intermediaries such as venture capitalists and investment banks. We conclude that signaling theory offers a promising addition to existing theories of international alliances and other cross-border activities. We contrast some of the main arguments and predications of signaling theory with other theories used in international business, and we emphasize the research opportunities that exist for employing this perspective in international business studies in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Morck, R., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. 1997. The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A policy perspective. Small Business Economics, 9 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Yayavaram, S. 2011. Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organization Science, 22 (6): 1631–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. 2005. Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: Insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (9): 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. 2002. Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13 (2): 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P. S., Jiang, M., & Li, S. 2013. Licensee technological potential and exclusive rights in international licensing: A multilevel model. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (7): 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K.-H., Stulz, R. M., & Tan, H. 2008. Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (3): 581–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. 2007. Signalling and entry deterrence: A multi-dimensional analysis. Rand Journal of Economics, 38 (3): 670–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. 1989. The role of export subsidies when product quality is unknown. Journal of International Economics, 27 (1–2): 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baik, B., Kang, J.-K., Kim, J.-M., & Lee, J. 2013. The liability of foreignness in international equity investments: Evidence from the US stock market. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (4): 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Gompers, P. A. 2003. The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering. Journal of Law and Economics, 46 (2): 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, S., & Koza, M. P. 1993. Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 20 (1): 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., & Lupton, N. C. 2009. Managing joint ventures. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (2): 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. 2012. The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (2): 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. 1999. Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeh, K. K. 2011. Contracting costs and information asymmetry reduction in cross-border M&A. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (3): 568–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brau, J. C., Sutton, N. K., & Hatch, N. W. 2010. Dual-track versus single-track sell-outs: An empirical analysis of competing harvest strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (4): 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K., & Hennart, J.-F. 2007. Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 395–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bussgang, J. 2011. Mastering the VC game. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. 1990. Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Economics, 46 (3): 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R., & Manaster, S. 1990. Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45 (4): 1045–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. 1996. Multinational enterprises and economic analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celikyurt, U., Sevilir, M., & Shivdasani, A. 2010. Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (3): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3): 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., Covrig, V., & Ng, L. 2005. What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations worldwide. Journal of Finance, 60 (3): 1495–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. 2004. Venture capital financing, strategic alliances, and the initial public offerings of internet startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (5): 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23 (2): 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. D., & Dean, T. J. 2005. Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (7): 683–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. 2011. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37 (1): 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2010. What makes and what does not make a real option? A study of equity shares in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (1): 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M. A., Fariñas, J. C., & Ruano, S. 2002. Firm productivity and export markets: A nonparametric approach. Journal of International Economics, 57 (2): 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers, E., & Lewellen, K. 2003. The marketing role of IPOs: Evidence from internet stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (3): 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewally, M., & Ederington, L. 2006. Reputation, certification, warranties, and information as remedies for seller-buyer information asymmetries: Lessons from the online comic book market. Journal of Business, 79 (2): 693–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & Witteloostuijn, A. 2009. Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981–2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2): 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draho, J. 2004. The IPO decision: Why and how companies go public. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmaise, M., & Moskowitz, T. 2004. Confronting information asymmetries: Evidence from real estate markets. Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2): 405–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrette, B., Castañer, X., & Dussauge, P. 2009. Horizontal alliances as an alternative to autonomous production: Product expansion mode choice in the worldwide aircraft industry 1945–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (8): 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation degree of control over subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (2): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. 2006. Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (1): 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A. 1995. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50 (5): 1461–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. 2004. The venture capital cycle, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric analysis, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C. 2003. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (2): 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, O., & Robertson, T. S. 1991. Toward a theory of competitive market signaling: A research agenda. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6): 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1989. Can the “new forms of investment” substitute for the “old forms?” A transaction costs perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (2): 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., & Reddy, S. 1997. The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of Japanese investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. 2003. Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14 (3): 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15 (2): 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62 (1): 251–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H. 2004. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? Journal of Finance, 59 (4): 1805–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H. 2006. Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Science, 52 (2): 204–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, G. 2001. Familiarity breeds investment. Review of Financial Studies, 14 (3): 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphery-Jenner, M., & Suchard, J. -A. 2013. Foreign venture capitalists and the internationalization of entrepreneurial companies: Evidence from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (6): 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Jandik, T., & Kali, R. 2009. Legal systems, information asymmetry, and firm boundaries: Cross-border choices to diversify through mergers, joint ventures, or strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (4): 578–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, T., & Ljungqvist, A. 2001. The role of hostile stakes in German corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (4): 397–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.-K., & Kim, J. -M. 2010. Do foreign investors exhibit a corporate governance disadvantage? An information asymmetry perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1415–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, S., & Miyagiwa, K. 2009. FDI as a signal of quality. Economics Letters, 103 (3): 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, D., Ng, L., & Wang, Q. 2010. Home bias in foreign investment decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (6): 960–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (4): 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D., & Miller, S. R. 2008. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, 19 (4): 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. M. 2001. What’s in a name.com? The effects of ‘.com’ name changes on stock prices and trading activity. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (8): 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, E., & McFadyen, M. A. 2009. Managing liquidity in research-intensive firms: Signaling and cash flow effects of patents and alliance activities. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (6): 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. 2004. Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management, 33 (3): 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Schultz, P. 2005. Liquidity: Urban versus rural firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 78 (2): 341–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 1997. Partner selection and venturing success: The case of joint ventures with firms in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 8 (6): 648–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, S., & Gaur, A. S. 2014. Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (2): 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. 1991. Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46 (3): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezias, J. M. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3): 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. 2005. Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29 (3): 533–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahey, J. 1986. Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics, 33 (3): 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S., Danzon, P. M., & McCullough, J. 2005. Biotech-pharmaceutical alliances as a signal of asset and firm quality. Journal of Business, 78 (4): 1433–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. O. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (3): 458–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G., & Gulati, R. 2007. Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 5 (4): 339–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raff, H., Ryan, M., & Stähler, F. 2009. The choice of market entry mode: Greenfield investment, M&A and joint venture. International Review of Economics and Finance, 18 (1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragozzino, R., & Reuer, J. J. 2007. Initial public offerings and the acquisition of entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 5 (2): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragozzino, R., & Reuer, J. J. 2011. Geographic distance and corporate acquisitions: Signals from IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (8): 876–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsinghani, M. 2011. The business of venture capital. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, S. 2000. The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: When social networks really matter. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4): 813–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Ragozzino, R. 2012. The choice between joint ventures and acquisitions: Insights from signaling theory. Organization Science, 23 (4): 1175–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. 2010. Discovering valuable growth opportunities: An analysis of equity alliances with IPO firms. Organization Science, 21 (1): 202–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. C. 2001. Silver signals: Twenty-five years of screening and signaling. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2): 432–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. 2008. Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (5): 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M. 2011. The benefits of geographic sales diversification: How exporting facilitates capital investment. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (10): 1046–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. 2009. Is there a better commitment mechanism than cross-listings for emerging economy firms? Evidence from Mexico. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (7): 1171–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. 1974. Competitive and optimal responses to signals: An analysis of efficiency and distribution. Journal of Economic Theory, 7 (3): 196–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2): 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., & Phene, A. 2007. Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organization Science, 18 (2): 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. 2002. External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13 (6): 714–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B. 2004. Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54 (2): 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuong, Q. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57 (2): 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, I. 1989. Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 44 (2): 421–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Zhou, C., & Phan, P. 2010. A real options perspective on sequential acquisitions in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (1): 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Hernandez, E., & Banerjee, S. 2010. Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organization Science, 21 (5): 1072–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 2002. The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., & Xu, D. 2012. How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (7): 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted by Ulf Andersson, Area Editor, 10 November 2013. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reuer, J., Ragozzino, R. Signals and international alliance formation: The roles of affiliations and international activities. J Int Bus Stud 45, 321–337 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.3

Keywords

Navigation