Skip to main content
Log in

Macroeconomic Fundamentals of Poverty and Deprivation: An Empirical Study for Developed Countries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides a relevant contribution to literature on the macroeconomic determinants of multidimensional deprivation in developed countries; this type of analysis is not as frequent in the literature as that explaining poverty stricto sensu. After a review of the macroeconomic mechanisms of poverty, we propose a composite index to capture multidimensional poverty as to allow a comparative assessment of deprivation across European Union countries. Relying on the macroeconomic transmission mechanisms that influence poverty, a panel data econometric approach is implemented to study the relation between the proposed composite index and macroeconomic variables. Results show that a multidimensional poverty concept is relevant for assessing deprivation in Europe and that the dynamics of main macroeconomic variables crucially affect deprivation performances. The latter result is robust, holding for different poverty measures.

Abstract

Cette étude contribue de manière pertinente à la littérature sur les déterminants macroéconomiques de la pauvreté multidimensionnelle dans les pays développés; dans la littérature économique, ce type d’analyse n’est pas aussi fréquent que celle qui cherche à expliquer la pauvreté au sens strict. Après une revue des mécanismes macroéconomiques de la pauvreté, nous proposons un indice composite qui reflète la pauvreté multidimensionnelle afin d’effectuer une évaluation comparative de la pauvreté dans les pays de l’Union Européenne. En se basant sur les mécanismes macroéconomiques de transmission qui influencent la pauvreté, une approche économétrique longitudinale est utilisée pour étudier la relation entre l’indice composite proposé et des variables macroéconomiques. Les résultats montrent que le concept de pauvreté multidimensionnelle est pertinent dans l’évaluation de la pauvreté en Europe et que les dynamiques des principales variables macroéconomiques affectent de façon significative les manifestations de la pauvreté. Ce dernier résultat est robuste et est valable pour différentes mesures de la pauvreté.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a detailed analysis of the evolution of the concept of poverty, see, for example, Misturelli and Heffernan (2008) and Lomasky and Swan (2009).

  2. In the sections ‘Multidimensional Poverty across Selected EU Countries’ and ‘Deprivation and macro mechanisms: A panel data analysis’, we use the terms ‘poverty’ and ‘deprivation’ interchangeably.

  3. Since the seminal contribution of Yitzhaki (1979), the Gini coefficient has been a common method to measure relative monetary poverty.

  4. Corruption Perceptions Index (2013) http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/, accessed 24 February 2014.

  5. The rate of severe material deprivation is defined as the percentage of the population facing four of the nine material deprivation items: (i) Inability to face unexpected financial expenses; (ii) Inability to afford a 1-week annual holiday away from home; (iii) Arrears (mortgage or rent payments, utility bills or hire purchase); (iv) Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken or fish every second day; (v) Inability to keep the home adequately warm; (vi) Enforced lack of a washing machine; (vii) Enforced lack of a colour TV; (viii) Enforced lack of a telephone; and (ix) Enforced lack of a personal car.

  6. Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and the UK.

  7. In our study, the maximum value in the ranking (R) is 24 (the total number of countries). If two countries or more have the same domain ranking, the maximum score (R) is not 24, but lower.

  8. Due to data restrictions, namely, for the output gap, Latvia and Lithuania were excluded from the sample used in the section ‘Multidimensional Poverty across Selected EU Countries’.

  9. See methodological notes in Eurostat (2012).

  10. All data, with the exception of WGI and OUTPUT_GAPR, are from the Eurostat database, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes. The governance index was computed using data from the World Bank, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (both accessed in December, 2013).

  11. Recently, Bossert et al (2013) apply a measure to EU countries, based on a popular index of multidimensional poverty, but focused on material deprivation. They reveal that the results differ substantially from poverty measures based exclusively on income.

References

  • Agénor, P.R. (2005) The macroeconomics of poverty reduction. The Manchester School 73 (4): 369–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agénor, P.R., Nihal, B. and Karim, A. (2008) The roads out of poverty? Assessing the links between aid, public investment, growth, and poverty reduction. Journal of Development Economics 86 (2): 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T., Dutta, J. and Sena, V. (2008) Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (2): 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akoum, I. (2008) Globalization, growth and poverty: The missing link. International Journal of Social Economics 35 (4): 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, P. (1997) Understanding Poverty, 2nd edn. London: MacMillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G. (1997) Rules and discretion with noncoordinated monetary and fiscal policies. Economic Inquiry 25 (4): 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. and Santos, M.E. (2010) Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Reports, Oxford: United Nations.

  • Ames, B., Brown, W., Devarajan, S. and Izquierdo, A. (2001) Macroeconomics policies and poverty reduction, Paperback, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

  • Atkinson, A.B. (2003) Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality 1 (1): 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., Marlier, E., Montaigne, F. and Reinstadler, A. (2010) Income poverty and income. In: A.B. Atkinson and E. Marlier (eds.) Income and Living Conditions in Europe. Chapter 5. Eurostat Statistical Books, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 102–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azis, I. (2008) Macroeconomic Policy and Poverty, ADBI Discussion Paper 111. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

  • Balke, N.S. and Slottje, D.J. (1993) Poverty and change in the macroeconomy: A dynamic macroeconometric model. The Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (1): 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlevy, G. and Tsiddon, D. (2006) Earnings inequality and the business cycle. European Economic Review 50 (1): 55–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. (1989) Disaggregating the effects of the business cycle on the distribution of income. Economica 56 (222): 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. and Blinder, A.S. (1986) Macroeconomics, income distribution and poverty. In: S.H. Danziger and D.H. Weinberg (eds.) Fighting Poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 180–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. and Esaki, H.Y. (1978) Macroeconomic activity and income distribution in the postwar United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (4): 604–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Chakravarty, S.R. and D’Ambrosio, C. (2013) Multidimensional poverty and material deprivation with discrete data. The Review of Income and Wealth 59 (1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli, A. and Zani, S. (1990) A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: C. Dagum and M. Zenga (eds.) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 272–284.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli, B. and Lemmi, A. (1995) A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes by Monte dei Paschi di Siena 24 (1): 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. and Dollar, D. (2001) Can the world cut poverty in half? How policy reform and effective aid can meet international goals. World Development 29 (11): 1787–1802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S.H. and Sandefur, G.D. (1994) Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S.H. (2007) Fighting poverty revisited: What did researchers know 40 years ago? What do we know today? Focus 25 (1): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decancq, K. and Lugo, M.A. (2013) Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: An overview. Econometric Reviews 32 (1): 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFina, R.H. (2004) The impacts of unemployment on alternative poverty rates. Review of Income and Wealth 50 (1): 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1988) An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty. Oxford Economic Papers 40 (3): 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, J. and Silber, J. (2005) Measuring multidimensional poverty: An empirical comparison of various approaches. Review of Income and Wealth 51 (1): 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, S. and Ramlogan-Dobson, C. (2009) Is there a trade-off between income inequality and corruption? Evidence from Latin America. Economic Letters 107 (2): 102–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. and Gregoire, P. (2002) Absolute and Relative Deprivation and the Measurement of Poverty. International Association for Research in Income and Wealth 48 (4): 471–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993) Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (3): 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epaulard, A. (2003) Macroeconomic Performance and Poverty Reduction, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper No. 03/72.

  • European Union (EU) (2014) Horizon 2020. The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/growth-low-wage-low-skilled-jobs-throughout-europe-need-solution, accessed 24 February 2014.

  • Eurostat (2010) Macro determinants of individual income poverty in 93 regions of Europe, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Eurostat Methodologies and Working papers.

  • Eurostat (2012) Population and social conditions — Statistics in focus 9/2012, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-009/EN/KS-SF-12-009-EN.PDF, accessed February 2014.

  • Evrensel, A. (2010) Institutional and economic determinants of corruption: A cross-section analysis. Applied Economics Letters 17 (6): 551–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, P. and Hon, V. (2000) Poverty and Labour-Intensive Growth, World Bank, PREM Network. Washington DC: Economic Policy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1993) The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (3): 485–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O. and Zeira, J. (1993) Income distribution and macroeconomics. Review of Economic Studies 60 (1): 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi, F. and Spaventa, L. (2010) Why the Current Account Matters in a Monetary Union, UK: CEPR Discussion Papers No. 8008.

  • Gottschalk, P. and Danziger, S. (1985) A framework for evaluating the effects of economic growth and transfers on poverty. American Economic Review 75 (1): 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J. (1985) Money and Value. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (2004) Basic Econometrics, 4th edn. USA: McGraw−Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, E. and Paldam, M. (2009) The transition of corruption: From poverty to honesty. Economics Letters 103 (3): 146–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2012) World Economic Outlook Database, October 2012, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/01/weodata/index.aspx, accessed March 2013.

  • Jones, G.A. and Chant, S. (2009) Globalising initiatives for gender equality and poverty reduction: Exploring ‘failure’ with reference to education and work among urban youth in the Gambia and Ghana. Geoforum 40 (2): 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (September). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130.

  • Kraay, A. and Raddatz, C. (2007) Poverty traps, aid, and growth. Journal of Development Economics 82 (2): 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomasky, L. and Swan, K. (2009) Wealth and poverty in the liberal tradition. The Independent Review 13 (4): 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabughi, N. and Selim, T. (2006) Poverty as social deprivation: A survey. Review of Social Economy 64 (2): 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, D., Barnes, H., Noble, M., Davies, J., Garratt, E. and Dibben, C. (2011) The English indices of deprivation 2010. Department for Communities and Local Government. March, London: Crown, p. 143.

  • Misturelli, F. and Heffernan, C. (2008) What is poverty? A diachronic exploration of the discourse on poverty from the 1970s to the 2000s. The European Journal of Development Research 20 (4): 666–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M.H., Barnes, G. and Wright, R.B. (2008) Small Area Indices of Multiple Deprivation for South Africa, UNU-WIDER Conference on Frontiers of Poverty Analysis, United Nations University, 26–27 September, (mimeo).

  • Noble, M., Lloyd, M., Wright, G., Dibben, C. and Smith, G. (2001) Developing deprivation measures for Northern Ireland. Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland XXXI: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M. et al. (2006a) The Provincial Indices of Multiple Deprivation for South Africa 2001-Technical Report. UK: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M., Wright, G., Smith, G.A.N. and Dibben, C. (2006b) Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning A 38 (1): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing, OCDE.

  • OECD (2012) OECD Economic Outlook, Vol. 2012/2, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_outlook-v2012.

  • Petrakis, P.E. and Stamatakis, D. (2002) Growth and education levels: A comparative analysis. Economics of Education Review 21 (5): 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhill, I. (1988) Poverty in the U.S.: Why is it so persistent? Journal of Economic Literature 26 (3): 1073–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarabini, A. (2010) Education and poverty in the global development agenda: Emergence, evolution and consolidation. International Journal of Education Development 30 (2): 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi, E. and Mohan, R. (2010) Institutions and poverty. Journal of Development Studies 46 (6): 1047–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1987) Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy 16 (2): 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) World Development Report 2000 ⁄2001: Attacking Poverty. New York and Washington DC: Oxford University Press, World Bank.

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979) Relative deprivation and the gini coefficient. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 (2): 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix A

Transformed Ranking Per Deprivation Dimension

Table A1

Table A1 Income deprivation

Table A2

Table A2 Employment deprivation

Table A3

Table A3 Health deprivation and disability

Table A4

Table A4 Education, skills and training deprivation

Table A5

Table A5 Barriers to housing and service

Table A6

Table A6 Crime

Table A7

Table A7 Living environment deprivation

Appendix B

Index of Multiple Deprivation for Developed Countries

Table B1

Table B1 Index of Multiple Deprivation for Developed Countries

Table B2

Table B2 Index of Multiple Deprivation for Developed Countries (data-driven)

Appendix C

Correlation Matrixes between Variables in Specification (III)

Table C1

Table C1 Correlations between variables in Specification (III) for IMD_D (data-driven)

Table C2

Table C2 Correlations between variables in Specification (III) for IMD_D

Table C3

Table C3 Correlations between variables in Specification (III) for AROPE

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ribeiro, A., Silva, S. & Guimarães, D. Macroeconomic Fundamentals of Poverty and Deprivation: An Empirical Study for Developed Countries. Eur J Dev Res 27, 37–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.16

Keywords

Navigation