Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building Intangible Resources: The Stickiness of Reputation

  • Academic Research
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion that reputation takes significant time and effort to build is well recognized by researchers in the field. This study tests the effects of consistency and change in relative financial performance on subsequent firm reputation. Based on reputation data from Fortune magazine's annual survey of corporate reputation, we find that firms that perform relatively better tend to have better reputation. In addition, firms that perform consistently better also have better reputation than those that are less consistent in their superior performance. Conversely, firms that perform consistently worse have worse reputations than those that are less consistent in their inferior relative performance. Finally, the change in reputation as a result of a change in positive performance follows an exponential rather than a linear function. These results suggest the sticky nature of reputation and have implications for firms attempting to build intangible resources for competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000) ‘Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C. and Ang, S.H. (2001) ‘Building reputations: The role of alliances in the European business school scene’, Long Range Planning, 34, 741–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, R.P. and Ritter, J.R. (1986) ‘Investment banking, reputation, and underpricing of initial public offerings’, Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, E.L., Carnes, T.A. and Richardson, V.J. (2000) ‘The market valuation of corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. and Perry, S. (1994) ‘Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's “Most Admired” companies’, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1347–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, W. and Chu, W. (1994) ‘Signaling quality by selling through a reputable retailer: An example of renting the reputation of another agent’, Marketing Science, 13, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989) ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science, 35, 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G.R. (2001) Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image, and Performance, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G.R. (2004) ‘Corporate reputations: Should you compete on yours?’ California Management Review, 46, 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E., Montes, J.M. and Vazquez, C.J. (2000) ‘Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources: A resource-based approach’, Technovation, 20, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C.M., O’Conner, E.J. and Aguinis, H. (2001) ‘All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organizational levels’, Academy of Management Review, 26, 224–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) ‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G.E. and Wang, J. (1994) ‘The fortune corporate “reputation” index: Reputation for what?’ Journal of Management, 20, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996) ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1992) ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1993) ‘A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, S.A. and Slocum, J.W. (1996) ‘The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1977) ‘The population ecology of organizations’, American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. and Leffler, K.B. (1981) ‘The role of market forces in assuming contractual performance’, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S. and Rindova, V. (2001) ‘Reputation building and performance: An empirical analysis of the top-50 pure internet firms’, European Management Journal, 19, 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J.B., Schneeweis, T. and Branch, B. (1990) ‘Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance’, Journal of Management, 16, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. (1994) ‘Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994) ‘The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912’, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter Special Issue), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R. (2002) ‘Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabate, J.M.F. and Puente, E.Q. (2003) ‘Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: A survey of the literature’, Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., Mouritsen, J. and Gabrielsen, G. (2001) ‘Sticky reputation: Analyzing a ranking system’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J. (1985) ‘A theory of credibility’, Review of Economic Studies, 52, 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H. and Hybels, R.C. (1999) ‘Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. and Figlewicz, R.E. (1999) ‘Evaluating corporate performance: A comparison of the Fortune reputation survey and the Socrates social rating database’, Journal of Managerial Issues, 11, 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1996) ‘A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality)’, Review of Economic Studies, 63, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergin, R.C. and Qoronfleh, M.W. (1998) ‘Corporate reputation and the stock market’, Business Horizons, 41, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B. (2004) ‘Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K. and Camerer, C. (1988) ‘Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications’, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1988) ‘Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality’, Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and International Business, The University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand

    Siah Hwee Ang

  2. Microsoft Limited, London, UK

    Ana-Maria Wight

Authors
  1. Siah Hwee Ang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana-Maria Wight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ang, S., Wight, AM. Building Intangible Resources: The Stickiness of Reputation. Corp Reputation Rev 12, 21–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.3

Keywords

Search

Navigation