Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of civil society influence: The case of international development and humanitarian NGOs in the Czech Republic and Hungary

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Accession to the EU has had ambiguous effects on civil society organizations (CSOs) in the East Central European countries. A general observation is that accession has not led to the systematic empowerment of CSOs in terms of growing influence on national policy making. This article investigates the determinants of successful CSO advocacy by looking at international development and humanitarian NGOs (NGDOs) in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Reforms in the past decade in the Czech Republic have created an international development policy largely in line with NGDO interests, while Hungary’s ministry of foreign affairs seems to have been unresponsive to reform demands from civil society. The article argues that there is clear evidence of NGDO influence in the Czech Republic on international development policy, which is because of the fact that Czech NGDOs have been able solve problems of collective actions, while the Hungarian NGDO sector remains fragmented. They also have relatively stronger capacities, can rely on greater public support and can thus present more legitimate demands towards their government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 01 February 2013.

  2. Interviews with an expert from a Czech NGDO and CONCORD, 23 January 2013 and 04 February 2013.

  3. Interview with a FoRS board member, 07 March 2013.

  4. Interview with a FoRS board member, 07 March 2013, and a Czech NGDO expert, 04 February 2013.

  5. Interview with a Czech NGDO expert, 08 March 2013.

  6. Interview with a CzDA official, 15 February 2013.

  7. Interview with a Czech NGDO expert, 07 March 2013.

  8. Interview with a FoRS representative, 08 March 2013.

  9. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 05 November 2012.

  10. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 05 November 2012.

  11. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 06 February 2013.

  12. Interview with a FoRS representative, 08 March 2013.

  13. The database is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/work/funding/beneficiaries/index.cfm?lang=en.

  14. While the EC is the most important international source of financing for NGDOs in ECE, other sources, such as the UN system, may also play a role. However, it has not been possible to obtain comparable data on Czech and Hungarian participation from these sources.

  15. Interview with a FoRS board member, 07 March 2013.

  16. Interview with a Czech NGDO expert, 04 February 2013.

  17. Interview with a Czech NGDO expert, 08 March 2013.

  18. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 01 February 2013.

  19. Interview with a Czech NGDO expert, 04 February 2013.

  20. Interview with a FoRS board member, 07 March 2013.

  21. Interview with a Czech MFA official, 07 March 2013.

  22. Interview with a Czech MFA official, 07 March 2013.

  23. Interview with a CzDA official, 21 April 2012.

  24. Interview with a FoRS representative, 08 March 2013.

  25. Interview with Czech NGDO experts, 07 March 2013 and 17 October 2013.

  26. In her analysis of Slovenian NGDOs, Bučar (2012, p. 85) characterizes this relationship as ‘allies’ in the ‘promotion of the topic for their mutual benefit’.

  27. Interview with a FoRS board member, 07 March 2013.

  28. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 06 February 2013.

  29. Interview with a Hungarian MFA official, 24 April 2013.

  30. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 01 February 2013.

  31. Interview with a Hungarian MFA official, 24 April 2013.

  32. Interview with a Hungarian MFA official, 25 November 2012.

  33. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 06 February 2013.

  34. Interview with a Hungarian NGDO expert, 05 August 2013.

References

  • Batory, A. and Cartwright, A. (2011) Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: The role of civil society organizations in structural funds monitoring. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49(4): 697–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2010) Why you don’t always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and Buzogány, A. (2010) Governing EU accession in transition countries: The role of non-state actors. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 158–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, L. (2008) Multi-level governance – The eastern versions. Regional and Federal Studies 18(5): 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bučar, M. (2012) Involving civil society in the international development cooperation of ‘new’ EU member states: The case of Slovenia. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmin, J. and Fagan, A. (2010) Environmental mobilisation and organisations in postsocialist Europe and the former Soviet Union. Environmental Politics 19(5): 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONCORD (2007) AidWatch 2007: Hold the Applause! EU Governments Risk Breaking Aid Promises. Brussels: CONCORD.

  • Drążkiewicz-Grodzicka, E. (2013) From recipient to donor: The case of Polish development cooperation. Human Organization 72(1): 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer (2005) Attitudes towards Development Aid. Brussles: European Commission.

  • Fagan, A. (2005) Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization 12(4): 528–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FoRS (2012) Zpráva FoRS o zahraniční rozvojovéspolupráci ČR za rok 2011. Prague: FoRS.

  • Hódosi, R. (2012) Mit tesz Magyarország a fejlődő országokért? Stratégiai fordulópont előtt a magyar nemzetközi fejlesztési együttműködés. Budapest: HAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horký, O. (2010) Development cooperation in the Czech foreign policy. In: M. Kořan (ed.) Czech Foreign Policy in 2007–2009: Analysis. Prague: Institute of International Relations, pp. 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horký, O. (2012) The transfer of the Central and Eastern European ‘transition experience’ to the south: Myth or reality? Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungarian MFA (2012) Magyarország 2012. évi nemzetközi fejlesztési és humanitárius segítségnyújtási tevékenységéről. Budapest: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  • Johansson, K.-E., Elgström, O., Kimanzu, N., Nylund, J.-E. and Persson, R. (2010) Trends in development aid, negotiation processes and NGO policy change. Voluntas 21(3): 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, J. (2007) A magyar nemzetközi fejlesztéspolitika a számok tükrében. Budapest: HAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, J. (2011) A magyar NEFE a válság éveiben. Budapest: HAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, A. and Trappmann, V. (2010) Civil society in Central and Eastern Europe: The ambivalent legacy of accession. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, C. (2006) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundsgaarde, E. (2013) The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M. and Carbone, M. (2006) New Pathways in International Development. Gender and Civil Society in EU Policy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) DAC Special Review of the Czech Republic. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2014) DAC datasets on OECD.stat, http://www.oecd.org/dac/aidstatistics/internationaldevelopmentstatisticsidsonlinedatabasesonaidandotherresourceflows.htm, accessed 14 July 2014.

  • Palubinskas, G. (2003) Democratization: The development of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Administration & Management 8(3): 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paragi, B. (2010) Hungarian development policy. In: P. Hoebink (ed.) European Development Cooperation – In Between the Local and the Global. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, T. and Tarrow, S. (2007) Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity: The puzzle of East-Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Publish What You Fund (2013) Aid Transparency Index, http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-Aid-Transparency-Index.pdf, accessed 5 September 2014.

  • Roth, S. (2007) Sisterhood and solidarity? Women’s organizations in the expanded European Union. Social Politics 14(4): 460–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmeczi, A. (2013) The Role of the Hungarian Civil Society in Development Assistance and Aid Effectiveness, CEU Centre for Policy Studies Policy Paper, available online: http://cps.ceu.hu/sites/default/files/field_attachment/news/node-34908/PolicyPaper_CPS_Selmeczi_CSO_FinalDraft_11March2013.pdf.

  • Sládková, Z. (2011) Czech Republic and its Official Development Assistance. FoRS Briefing Paper, 2/2011.

  • Szent-Iványi, B. (2012) Hungarian international development co-operation: Context, stakeholders and performance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szent-Iványi, B. and Lightfoot, S. (2015) New Europe’s New Development Aid. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szent-Iványi, B. and Tétényi, A. (2008) Transition and foreign aid policies in the Visegrád countries. A path dependant approach. Transition Studies Review 15(3): 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topolánek, M. (2006) Projev premiéra Mirka Topolánka na výroční poradě vedoucích zastupitelských úřadů ČR v Černínském paláci dne 7. září 2006, http://www.vlada.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=18863, accessed 20 August 2015.

  • Vachudova, M. (2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (2006) Simon Panek: A former student leader remembers the drama of November 1989, http://www.radio.cz/en/section/one-on-one/simon-panek-a-former-student-leader-remembers-the-drama-of-november-1989.

  • Wallace, C., Pichler, F. and Haerpfer, C. (2012) Is Eastern Europe different? Changing patterns of civil society in Europe and America 1995–2005. East European Politics and Societies 26(3): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zázvorková, M. (2011) The Involvement of Development NGOs from Visegrad Countries in the Financial Instruments of the European Commission. Prague: FoRS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The writing of this paper was supported by the EU’s FP7 Marie Curie Programme (project INTDEPNEW). The authors are grateful to all the government, EU officials and NGO representatives who agreed to be interviewed. Charlie Burns and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful and insightful comments and the paper is much improved as a result. The editors at CEP provided excellent editorial guidance. The views expressed here are our own, as are any mistakes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balázs Szent-Iványi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szent-Iványi, B., Lightfoot, S. Determinants of civil society influence: The case of international development and humanitarian NGOs in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Comp Eur Polit 14, 761–780 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.50

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.50

Keywords

Navigation