Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Allison, P. 2001. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Almond, P., Edwards, T., Colling, T., Ferner, A., Gunnigle, P., Muller-Camen, M., Quintanilla, J., & Wächter, H. 2005. Unravelling home and host country effects: An investigation of the HR policies of an American multinational in four European countries. Industrial Relations, 44(2): 276–306.
Barry, M., & Wailes, N. 2004. Contrasting systems? 100 years of arbitration in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(4): 430–447.CrossRef
Bartlett, C. A. 1986. Building and managing the transnational: The new organizational challenge. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries: 367–401. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bévort, F., Pedersen, J. S., & Sundbo, J. 1995. Denmark. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in Western Europe: 31–58. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.
Brewster, C., Hegewisch, A., Mayne, L., & Tregaskis, O. 1994. Methodology of the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Project. In C. Brewster and A. Hegewisch (Eds), Policy and practice in European human resource management: 230–245. London: Routledge.
Brewster, C., Tregaskis, O., Hegewisch, A., & Mayne, L. 1996. Comparative research in human resource management: A review and an example. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(4): 585–604.CrossRef
Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organizations cross-nationally. In J. L. C. Cheng and R. B. Peterson (Eds), Advances in international comparative management, Vol. 13, 27–75. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Pitkethly, R. 2001. The management of international acquisitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croucher, R., Gooderham, P. N., & Parry, E. 2006. The influences on direct communication in British and Danish firms: Country, ‘strategic HRM’ or unionization? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(3): 267–286.CrossRef
Dell'Aringa, C., & Lodovici, M. 1992. Industrial relations and economic performance. In T. Treu (Ed.), Participation in public policy making: The role of trade unions and employers' associations: 26–58. Berlin: De Gruyter.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.CrossRef
Edwards, P., Hall, M., Hyman, R., Marginson, P., Sisson, K., Waddington, J., & Winchester, D. 1992. Great Britain: Still muddling through. In A. Ferner and R. Hyman (Eds), Industrial relations in the new Europe: 1–68. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fenton-O'Creevy, M. P., & Wood, S. J. 2007. Diffusion of human resource management systems in UK headquartered multinational enterprises: Integrating institutional and strategic choice explanations. European Journal of International Management, 1(4) (forthcoming).
Ferner, A. 1997. Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(1): 19–37.CrossRef
Ferner, A., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., Edwards, T., Holden, L., & Muller-Camen, M. 2004. Dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: Case-study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies, 25(3): 363–391.CrossRef
Foss, N. 1999. The challenge of business systems and the challenge to business systems. International Journal of Management and Organization, 29(2): 9–24.CrossRef
French, S. 2001. Works councils in unified Germany: Still loyal to the trade unions? International Journal of Manpower, 22(6): 560–578.CrossRef
Garnier, G. H. 1982. Context and decision-making autonomy in the foreign affiliates of US multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4): 693–908.CrossRef
Geppert, M., Matten, D., & Williams, K. 2002. Introduction. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Mattern, D. 2003. The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 617–641.CrossRef
Giardini, A., Kabst, R., & Müller-Camen, M. 2005. HRM in the German business system. Management Revue, 16(1): 63–80.
Gooderham, P. N., & Nordhaug, O. 1997. Flexibility in Norwegian and UK firms: Competitive pressures and institutional embeddedness. Employment Relations, 19(6): 568–580.CrossRef
Gooderham, P. N., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. 1999. Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 507–531.CrossRef
Gunnigle, P., MacCurtain, S., & Morley, M. 2001. Why Ireland? A qualitative review of the factors influencing the location of US multinationals in Ireland with particular reference to the impact of labour issues. Economic and Social Review, 32(1): 43–67.
Gunnigle, P., Morley, M., & Turner, T. 1997. Challenging collectivist traditions: Individualism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites. Economic and Social Review, 28(1): 105–134.
Gunnigle, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Kinsella, M. 2002. Organised labour in the new economy: Trade unions and public policy in the Republic of Ireland. In D. D'Art and T. Turner (Eds), Irish employment relations in the new economy: 222–258. Dublin: Blackhall Press.
Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. 2004. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy, MPIfG Discussion paper 04/5. Berlin: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds) 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hamill, J. 1984. Labour relations decision making within multinational corporations. Industrial Relations Journal, 15(2): 30–34.CrossRef
Harzing, A .W. 2000. An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1): 101–120.CrossRef
Harzing, A.-W., & Sorge, A. 2003. The relative impact of country of origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: Worldwide and European perspectives. Organization Studies, 24(2): 187–214.CrossRef
Harzing, A. -W., Sorge, A., & Paauwe, J. 2002. Headquarters–subsidiary relationships in multinational companies: A British-German comparison. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 96–118. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hassel, A. 1999. The erosion of the German system of industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(3): 483–505.CrossRef
Hitt, M., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2): 173–185.CrossRef
Hollingsworth, J. R. 1997. Continuities and changes in social systems of production: The cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States. In J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (Eds), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions: 260–282. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hollingsworth, J. R. 2003. Advancing the socio-economic paradigm with institutional analysis. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1): 130–134.CrossRef
Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (Eds) 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kihn, L. A. 2001. Strategies, decentralization, and controls in internationalized Finnish firms. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 1(1): 35–57.
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. 2001. Analysing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1): 49–69.
Klikauer, T. 2002. Stability in Germany's industrial relations: A critique on Hassel's erosion thesis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(2): 295–308.CrossRef
Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308–324.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.CrossRef
Kristensen, P. H. 1992. Strategies against structures: Institutions and economic organizations in Denmark. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: 117–136. London: Sage.
Lane, C. 1992. European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: 64–97. London: Sage.
Long, J. S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lovelock, C. H., & Yip, G. S. 1996. Developing global strategies for service business. California Management Review, 38(2): 64–86.CrossRef
Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. 1991. Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3): 429–444.CrossRef
Mayer, M., & Whittington, R. 2002. For boundedness in the study of comparative and international business: The case of the diversified multidivisional corporation. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 19–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Myloni, B., Harzing, A. W. K., & Mirza, H. 2004. Host country specific factors and the transfer of human resource management practices in multinational companies. International Journal of Manpower, 25(6): 518–534.CrossRef
Noorderhaven, N. G., & Harzing, A. W. K. 2003. The ‘country-of-origin effect’ in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms, and moderating conditions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(2): 47–66.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145–179.CrossRef
Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697–713.CrossRef
Ortiz, L. 1998. Union response to teamwork: the case of Opel Spain. Industrial Relations Journal, 29(1): 42–57.CrossRef
Peng, M. W., Lee, S. -H., & Wang, D. Y. L. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 622–633.CrossRef
Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 113–155.
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Nohria, N. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 229–251.CrossRef
Roth, K. 1992. Implementing international strategy at the business unit level: The role of managerial decision-making characteristics. Journal of Management, 18(4): 769–789.CrossRef
Royle, T. 2002. Resistance is useless! The problems of trade union organizations in the European fast-food industry: The Case of McDonald's. in M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 189–214. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rubery, J., & Wilkinson, F. 1994. Employer strategy and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scholz, C. 1996. Human resource management in Germany. in T. Clark (Ed.), European human resource management: 118–155. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Singe, I., & Croucher, R. 2005. US multinationals and the German industrial relations system. Management Revue, 16(1): 123–137.
Sorge, A. 1995. Cross-national differences in personnel and organization. In A. W. Harzing and J. van Ruysseveldt (Eds), International human resource management: An integrated approach: 99–123. London: Sage.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. 2005. Introduction. In W. Streeck and K. Thelen (Eds), Beyond continuity: 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taggart, J. H., & Hood, N. 1999. Determinants of autonomy in multinational corporation subsidiaries. European Management Journal, 17(2): 226–236.CrossRef
Tempel, A. 2002. Multinational companies, institutional environments and the diffusion of industrial relations practices. in M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 143–164. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wächter, H., & Müller-Camen, M. 2002. Co-determination and strategic integration in German firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(3): 76–87.CrossRef
Wächter, H., & Stengelhofen, T. 1995. Germany. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in western Europe: 89–112. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Westney, D. E. 1993. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal and D. E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation: 53–76. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRef
Wever, K. S. 1994. Learning from works councils: Five unspectacular case studies from Germany. Industrial Relations, 33(4): 467–481.
Whitley, R. 1992. Societies, firms and markets: The social structuring of business systems. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts: 5–45. London: Sage.
Whitley, R. 1997. The social construction of economic actors. In R. Whitley and P. H. Kristensen (Eds), The changing European firm: 39–66. London: Routledge.
Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 608–618.
Young, S., & Tavares, A. T. 2004. Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review, 13(2): 215–235.CrossRef
Young, S., Hood, N., & Hamill, J. 1985. Decision-making in foreign-owned multinational subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. Geneva: International Labour Office.