Crime Prevention & Community Safety

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 15–25

Building for Burglars?

Authors

  • Rachel Armitage
    • Researcher, Applied Criminology Group, University of Huddersfield
  • Steve Everson
    • Crime Reduction Co-ordinator in West Yorkshire Police, and is currently an independent researcher affiliated to the Applied Criminology Group at the University of Huddersfield
Research Article

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140159

Cite this article as:
Armitage, R. & Everson, S. Crime Prev Community Saf (2003) 5: 15. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140159

Abstract

This paper reports on a study conducted into the factors, other than location, which influence homebuyers to purchase a particular property. The study was prompted by a consistent failure over time by private housing developers to embrace the principles of the Association of Chief Police Officers ‘Secured By Design’ (SBD) award scheme, or even the major elements of that scheme, to ensure parity of security with newly built social housing. Many private housing developers have expressed the view, without supporting evidence, that they avoid building to SBD standards because the majority of house buyers regard a property with enhanced security as one that has reduced appeal. It has been these developers' expressed opinion that purchasers equate enhanced security with high-crime areas, and would therefore be turned off by rather than attracted to an SBD property. Without evidence to the contrary, developers have had little incentive to adapt their building practices, and individuals concerned with crime reduction have been unable to offer a convincing argument for them to do so.

Keywords

Secured By Designsecuritysafe environmentprivate housinghouse purchase

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2003