Alt, J.E. (1985) ‘Political parties, world demand, and unemployment. Domestic and international sources of economic activity’, American Political Science Review 79(4): 1016–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M.R., Garrett, G. and Lange, P. (1991) ‘Government partisanship, labor organization, and macroeconomic performance’, American Political Science Review 85(3): 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, B. (2004) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beffa, J.-L., Langenlach, L. and Touffut, J.-P. (2003) ‘Levelling the Playing Field or Queering the Pitch? How to interpret the takeover directive’, Prisme du Centre Cournot pour la Recherche en Economie 1, November 2003.
Berglöf, E. and Burkart, M. (2003) ‘European takeover regulation’, Economic Policy 18(1): 171–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beyer, J. and Höpner, M. (2003) ‘Corporate governance and the disintegration of organised capitalism in the 1990s’, West European Politics 26(4): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieling, H.-J. and Steinhilber, J. (2002) ‘Finanzmarktintegration und Corporate Governance in der Europäischen Union’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 9(1): 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, P. (2003) ‘Compromise sought on voting rights in EU’, Financial News (Daily), March 23, 2003.
Bolkestein, F. (2002) ‘Zeitfragen’, Neue Züricher Zeitung, November 9, 2002.
Boyer, R. (1998) ‘Hybridization and Models of Production: Geography, History, and Theory’, in R. Boyer, E. Charron, U. Jürgens and S. Tolliday (eds.) Between Imitation and Inovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–56.Google Scholar
Budge, I. and Robertson, D. (1987) ‘Comparative Analysis of Post-War Election Programs: Do Parties Differ and How?’, in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Herl (eds.) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programs in 19 Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, H. (2004) ‘The domestic politics of EU legislation — British, French and German attitudes towards takeover regulation, 1985–2003 Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March 11–13, 2004.
Cioffi, J. (2002) ‘Control, transparency, and the politics of company and takeover law reform in Germany and the European Union 13th International Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March 14–16, 2002.
Commission (2002) ‘Communication on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on takeover bids’, Commission of the European Communities, October 2, 2002.
Cook, J. and Deakin, S. (1999) ‘Stakeholding and corporate governance: Theory and evidence on economic performance, Discussion Paper, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
Dauner Lieb, B. and Lamandini, M. (2002) ‘The new proposal of a directive on company law concerning takeover bids and the achievement of a level playing field’, Report Commissioned by the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market of the European Parliament, December 2002.
de Jong, H.W. (1996) ‘European capitalism between freedom and social justice’, in W. Bratton, J. A. MacCahery, S. Picciotto and C. Scott (eds.) International Regulatory Competition and Coordination, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 538pp.Google Scholar
de Jong, H.W. (1997) ‘The governance structure and performance of large European corporations’, The Journal of Management and Governance 1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S. and Slinger, G. (1997) ‘Hostile takeovers, corporate law, and the theory of the firm’, Journal of Law and Society 24(1): 124–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeg, R. and Perez, S.A. (2000) ‘International capital mobility and domestic institutions: Corporate finance and governance in four European cases’, Governance 13(2): 119–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlin, A.S. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1995) ‘Discouraging rivals: Managerial rent seeking and economic insufficiencies’, American Economic Review 85(5): 1301–1312.Google Scholar
EIU (2003) ‘Takeover fudge’, Economist Intelligence Unit, December 3, 2003 (Wednesday).
European Commission (1996) ‘Press release: Streamlined proposal for takeovers directive’, RAPID, February 7, 1996.
European Commission (1997) ‘Press release: Company law: Amended proposal for a directive on takeover bids’, RAPID, November 20, 1997.
European Report (2001) ‘Eleventh hour deal on the takeover directive clinched’, European Report, No. 2599.
European Report (2002) ‘High Level Group presents first takeover bids report’, European Report, No. 2650, January 12, 2002.
European Report (2003) ‘MEPs give the thumbs-up to Council's takeover bids text’, European Report, No. 2829, December 17, 2003.
Europolitique (1991) ‘Accords et desaccords sur la directive sur les OPA’, Europolitique, No. 1666, April 6, 1991.
Fama, E. (1980) ‘Agency problems and the theory of the firm’, Journal of Political Economy 88(2): 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAZ (2003) ‘Kompromißangebote im EU-Übernahmerecht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 11, 2003, 15pp.
Gourevitch, P. and Shinn, J. (2005) Political Power and Corporate Control. The New Global Politics of Corporate Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, J. (2000) ‘European integration and changing corporate governance structures: The case of France’, Journal of Economic Issues 34(2): 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrera, F. and Jennen, B. (2003) ‘UK in deal with Germany over takeover code’, Financial Times, February 3, 2003 (Monday), 10pp.
Guerrera, F. and Williamson, H. (2003) ‘EU open to redrafting of takeover directive’, Financial Times, February 15, 2003, 9pp.
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P.A. and Gingerich, D.W. (2004) ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis’, Misc: MPIfG Discussion Paper, 04 (5).
Hay, D. and Morris, D.J. (1991) Industrial Economics and Organization: Theory and Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. (1977) ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policies’, American Political Science Review 71(4): 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. (1992) ‘Partisan theory after fifteen years’, European Journal of Political Economy 8(3): 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, A.M. and Swank, D.H. (1992) ‘Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies 1960–1982’, American Political Science Review 86(3): 658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. (2001) ‘Legislative behavior and party competition in the European Parliament: An application of nominate to the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. (2002) ‘Parliamentary behaviour with two principals: Preferences, parties, and voting in the European Parliament’, American Journal of Policial Science 46(4): 688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2005) ‘Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the European Parliament’, British Journal of Political Science 34(4): 767–793.Google Scholar
Holmes, G. and de Bony, E. (1990) ‘EC commission trains its guns on corporate takeover defenses’, M&A Europe, May/June, 1990, 35pp.
Höpner, M. (2003) ‘European corporate governance reform and the German party paradox’, Misc: MPIfG Discussion Paper, 03(4).
Höpner, M. and Jackson, G. (2001) ‘An emerging market for corporate control? The Mannesmann takeover and German corporate governance’, Misc: MPIfG Discussion Paper, 01 (4).
Jenkinson, T. and Mayer, C. (1992) ‘The assessment: Corporate governance and corporate control’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8(3): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennen, B. (2003) ‘Auf deutsches Betreiben zementiert die EU protektionistische Übernahmeregeln’, Financial Times Deutschland, December 17, 2003, 30pp.
Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. (1980) The City Takeover Code, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreppel, A. and Tsebelis, G. (1999) ‘Coalition formation in the European Parliament’, Comparative Political Studies 32(8): 933–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998) ‘Law and finance’, Journal of Political Economy 106(6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lannoo, K. (1999) ‘A European perspective on corporate governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(2): 269–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, S.J. and Freese, J. (2001) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Mallin, C. and Jelic, R. (2000) ‘Developments in corporate governance in Central and Eastern Europe’, Corporate Governance 8(1): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, H. (1965) ‘Mergers and the market for corporate control’, Journal of Political Economy 73(2): 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, A. (2000) ‘Corporate governance in Italy’, Corporate Governance 8(4): 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, J. (2002) ‘Distributional struggle in labor unions 13th International Conference of Europeanists’, Chicago, IL, March 14–16, 2002.
Noury, A. (2002) ‘Ideology, nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians’, European Union Politics 3(1): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OJ (2002) ‘Result of roll call votes: Lehne report A5-0237/2001’, Official Journal of the European Communities C65E: 70–71.
O’Sullivan, M. (2003) ‘The political economy of comparative corporate governance’, Review of International Political Economy 10(1): 23–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M. and Volpin, P. (forthcoming) ‘The political economy of corporate governance’, American Economic Review.
Roe, M.J. (2003) Political Determinants of Corporate Governance — Political Context, Corporate Impact, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, C. and Mejer, C. (2003) ‘The Danish corporate governance system: From stakeholder orientation towards shareholder value’, Corporate Governance 11(4): 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (2002) ‘The Impact of Political Parties, Constitutional Structures and Veto Players in Public Policy’, in H. Keman (ed.) Comparative Democratic Politics, London: Sage, pp. 166–184.Google Scholar
Schneper, W.D. and Guillén, M. (2003) ‘Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers’, Manuscript, December 2003 version (submitted to Administrative Science Quarterly).
Shleifer, A. and Summers, L.H. (1988) ‘Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers’, in A.J. Auerbach (ed.) Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1988) ‘Value maximization and the acquisition process’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2(1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997) ‘A survey of corporate governance’, Journal of Finance 52(2): 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.C. (1988) ‘Takeover threats and managerial myopia’, The Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (1991) ‘On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production’, in E. Matzner and W. Streeck (eds.) Beyond Keynesianism: The Socioeconomics of Production and Full Employment, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar, pp. 21–61.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2001) ‘Introduction: Explorations into the Origins of Non-Liberal Capitalism in Germany and Japan’, in W. Streeck and K. Yamamura (eds.) The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
SZ (2003) ‘Brüssel droht Vorschlag für Übernahme-Richtlinie zu kippen’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, November 24, 2003, 21pp.
Wilensky, H. (2002) Rich Democracies. Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar