Budden, Ph. (2002) ‘Observations on the Single European Act and the ‘relaunch of Europe’: a less ‘intergovernmental’ reading of the 1985 intergovernmental conference’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(1): 76–97.CrossRef
Christiansen, T. (2002) ‘The role of supranational actors in EU treaty reform’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(1): 33–53.CrossRef
Christiansen, T., Falkner, G. and Jørgensen, K.E. (2002) ‘Theorizing EU treaty reform: beyond diplomacy and bargaining’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(1): 12–32.CrossRef
Christiansen, T. and Jørgensen, K. (1998) ‘Negotiating treaty reform in the European Union: the role of the European Commission’, International Negotiation 3(3): 435–452.CrossRef
Closa, C. (2002) ‘An institutionalist interpretation of the formation of preferences in the EU. The debate on the future of the EU in Spain’, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University Scholars Seminar, unpublished paper.
Closa, C. (2004) ‘The Convention method and the transformation of EU constitutional politics’, in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds.) Developing a Constitution for Europe, London: Routledge.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2002a) ‘Communication from the Commission: a project for the European Union’, COM (2002) 247 final, 22 May, European Commission, Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities (2002b) ‘Feasibility study: contribution to a Preliminary Draft Constitution of the European Union’, Working Document, Available online.
Commission of the European Communities (2002c) ‘Peace, freedom, solidarity: Communication of the Commission on the institutional architecture’, COM (2002) 728 final, 4 December, European Commission, Brussels.
Cram, L. (1994) ‘The European Commission as a multi-organisation: social policy and IT policy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 194–217.
Dinan, D. (1997a) ‘The Commission and the Intergovernmental Conferences’, in N. Nugent (ed.) At the Heart of the Union, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 245–264.CrossRef
Dinan, D. (1997b) ‘The Commission and the Reform Process’, in G. Edwards and A. Pijpers (eds.) The Politics of European Treaty Reform, London: Pinter, pp. 188–211.
Endo, K. (1999) The Presidency of the European Commission under Jacques Delors: The Politics of Shared Leadership, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Falkner, G. (2002a) ‘How intergovernmental are Intergovernmental Conferences? An example from the Maastricht Treaty reform’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(1): 98–119.CrossRef
Falkner, G. (2002b) ‘How intergovernmental are Intergovernmetnal Conferences? An example from the Maastricht Treaty reform’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(10): 98–119.CrossRef
Forster, A. (1998) ‘Britain and the Negotiation of the Maastricht Treaty: a critique of liberal intergovernmentalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(3): 347–368.CrossRef
Georgakakis, D. (ed.) (2002) Les métiers de l’Europe politique, Strasbourg: Presses Universitaire de Strasbourg.
Grant, G. (1994) Inside the House that Jacques Built, London: Nicholas Brearley.
Gray, M. (2002a) ‘The European Commission: seeking the highest possible realistic line’, in F. Laursen (ed.) The Amsterdam Treaty: National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining and Outcome, Odense: Odense University Press.
Gray, M. (2002b) ‘Negotiating the Treaty of Amsterdam: the role and influence of the European Commission’, in F. Laursen (ed.) The Amsterdam Treaty: National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining, Outcome and Ratification, Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 381–404.
Gray, M. and Stubb, A. (2001) ‘Keynote Article: The Treaty of Nice — Negotiating a Poisoned Chalice’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 5–23.CrossRef
Hix, S. (1999) The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Hix, S. (2002) ‘Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 259–280.CrossRef
Hooghe, L. (2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joerges, C. (2002) ‘Guest Editorial: The Commissions White Paper on Governance in the EU — A Symptom of Crisis’, Common Market Law Review 39: 441–445.CrossRef
Joerges, C., Mény, Y. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.) (2001) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance, Available on line.
Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2004) ‘EU Member States and the Prodi Commission’, in D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.) The Changing European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 33–62.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.CrossRef
Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and power in the European Community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.CrossRef
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘A New Statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’, International Organization 53(4): 267–306.CrossRef
Moravcsik, A. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1998) ‘Federal ideals and constitutional realities in the Treaty of Amsterdam’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(Annual Review): 13–38.
Moravcsik, A. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1999) ‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: interests, influence, institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(1): 59–85.CrossRef
Niskanen, W. (1997) Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine.
Noël, E. (1992) ‘Reflections on the Maastricht treaty’, Government and Opposition 27(2): 148.CrossRef
Norman, P. (2003) The Accidental Constitution. The Story of the European Convention, Brussels: Eurocomment.
Peterson, J. (2004) ‘The Prodi Commission: fresh start or free fall?’, in D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.) The Changing European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ross, G. (1995) Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge: Polity.
Sloat, A. (2003) ‘The Preparation of the governance white paper’, Politics 23(2): 128–136.CrossRef
Sloat, A. (2004) ‘Governance in the making: the future of the EU's (thought) experiment’, in A. Warntjen and A. Wonka (eds.) Governance in Europe — The Role of Interest Groups, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Smith, A. (2004) Politics and the European Commission, London: Routledge.CrossRef
Sverdrup, U. (2002) ‘An institutional perspective on treaty reform: contextualising the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(1): 120–140.CrossRef
Wincott, D. (2001) ‘Looking forward or harking back? The Commission and the reform of governance in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(5): 897–911.CrossRef