Abstract
This article demonstrates how interaction between ports in a network can be analysed in two stages. The first stage is the analysis of the price response functions and it examines how a port sets its prices for infrastructure services given those of its competitors. The second stage involves the identification of network relationships and analyses strategic interactions based on the results obtained from the first stage. The procedure is applied to analyse the network relationships between ports in three regions in Australia, namely Queensland, South Australia and Victoria, and Western Australia. The results provide insights into strategic interactions in port networks not previously seen in the literature. Especially, it has been found that, while some ports appear to strategically interact with each other in price setting, other ports prefer to set their own prices independently of each other. Moreover, strategic pricing can be asymmetric rather than symmetric. The result of our analysis has important implications for port management and policymakers. For example, while the existence of ‘complementary’ strategic pricing may not be seen as evidence of price leadership, it indicates that port users may not be able to shop around among competing ports if the existing port increases its prices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Álvarez-Sanjaime, Ó., Cantos-Sánchez, P., Moner-Colonques, R. and Sempere-Monerris, J.J. (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivities in maritime freight transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 51(0): 50–61.
Bae, M.J., Chew, E.P., Lee, L.H. and Zhang, A. (2013) Container transshipment and port competition. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 479–494.
Bandara, M., Nguyen, H.-O. and Chen, S.-L. (2013) Determinants of port infrastructure pricing. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 29(2): 187–206.
Bandara, M.Y. and Nguyen, H.-O. (2014) Port Infrastructure Pricing Policy and Practice: A Case Study of Australia and New Zealand Seaports. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME); 15–18 July, Norfolk, Virginia.
Bandara, M.Y., Nguyen, H.-O. and Chen, P. S.-L. (2014) Port Infrastructure Pricing: Findings from a Survey of International Seaports. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME); 15–18 July, Norfolk, Virginia.
Chang, Y.-T., Lee, S.-Y. and Tongzon, J.L. (2008) Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy 32(6): 877–885.
Cullinane, K. and Wang, Y. (2012) The hierarchical configuration of the container port industry: An application of multiple linkage analysis. Maritime Policy & Management 39(2): 169–187.
De Borger, B., Proost, S. and Van Dender, K. (2008) Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42(3): 527–561.
Donselaar, P. W.-V. and Kolkman, J. (2010) Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities. Maritime Policy & Management 37(3): 271–284.
Ducruet, C., Rozenblat, C. and Zaidi, F. (2010) Ports in multi-level maritime networks: Evidence from the Atlantic (1996–2006). Journal of Transport Geography 18(4): 508–518.
Ender, W. (1995) Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Frankel, E.G. (1987) Port Planning and Development. New York: Wiley.
Hamilton, J.D. (1989) Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haralambides, H.E. (2002) Competition, excess capacity, and the pricing of port infrastructure. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4(4): 323–347.
Heaver, T.D. (2010) The response of liner shipping companies to the evolution of global supply chain management. In: C.T. Grammenos, N.K. Nomikos and A.H. Alizadeh (eds.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: Lloyd’s List, pp. 457–478.
Hoshino, H. (2010) Competition and collaboration among container ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 26(1): 31–47.
Ishii, M., Lee, P. T.-W., Tezuka, K. and Chang, Y.-T. (2013) A game theoretical analysis of port competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 49(1): 92–106.
Kaselimi, E.N., Notteboom, T.E. and De Borger, B. (2011) A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: The impact of dedicated terminals. Maritime Policy & Management 38(4): 395–414.
Low, J.M.W. and Tang, L.C. (2012) Network effects in the East Asia container ports industry. Maritime Policy & Management 39(4): 369–386.
Saeed, N. and Larsen, O.I. (2010) An application of cooperative game among container terminals of one port. European Journal of Operational Research 203(2): 393–403.
Sjostrom, W. (2010) Competition and cooperation in liner shipping. In: C.T. Grammenos, N.K. Nomikos and A.H. Alizadeh (eds.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: Lloyd’s List, pp. 433–456.
Song, D.-W. (2003) Port co-opetition in concept and practice. Maritime Policy & Management 30(1): 29–44.
Song, D.-W. and Panayides, P.M. (2008) Global supply chain and port/terminal: Integration and competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management 35(1), pp 73–87.
Talley, W.K. and Ng, M. (2013) Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers. International Journal of Production Economics 142(2): 311–316.
Tongzon, J. (2007) Determinants of competitiveness in logistics: Implications for the ASEAN region. Maritime Economics and Logistics 9(1): 67–83.
Van De Voorde, E. and Vanelslander, T. (2009) Market Power and Vertical and Horizotal Integration in the Maritime Shipping and Port Industry. Integration and Competition between Transport and Logistics Businesses. Transport Research Centre, OECD, pp. 67–96.
Van Der Horst, M.R. and De Langen, P.W. (2008) Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10(1): 108–129.
Xiao, Y., Ng, A.K.Y., Yang, H. and Fu, X. (2012) An Analysis of the dynamics of ownership, capacity investments and pricing structure of ports. Transport Reviews 32(5): 629–652.
Zhang, A. (2008) The Impact of Hinterland Access Conditions on Rivalry between Ports. OECD/ITF Discussion Paper 2008–8, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Acknowledgements
The above article is part of the NOL International Fellowship Research Project. The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and two anonymous referees for their feedback on an earlier version of the article. The untimely demise of our colleague Anthony Chin, while the article was under review, is also sadly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, HO., Chin, A., Tongzon, J. et al. Analysis of strategic pricing in the port sector: The network approach. Marit Econ Logist 18, 264–281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.9