Abstract
While the uptake of online communities toward development purposes continues to grow, many are characterized by an unresolved tension. On the one hand, they benefit from participation of heterogeneous stakeholders in their efforts to strengthen their expertise. On the other hand, these stakeholders represent highly diverging interests, which makes collective strategic action very challenging. To understand how online communities cope with this tension, we conducted a longitudinal, mixed method case study of an online community focused on development transportation. We argue that online communities are uniquely equipped, through their fluidity and open-endedness, to enable knowledge creation and agenda-setting. In so doing, online communities afford an ‘intermediary space’ that simultaneously accommodates both convergence and divergence of interests. Our study strengthens the bridge between information systems research and development studies, by highlighting the potential of ICT uptake toward ‘remaking participation’ in development debate, while including the perspectives of heterogeneous interest groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In September 2000, the United Nations General Assembly initiated a global partnership toward eight key areas for development, known as the ‘Millennium Development Goals’ or MDGs (see http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals). Transport remains implicit as a priority theme, but underlies all eight MDGs (see the World Bank report on ‘Transport and the Millennium Development Goals in Africa’, available at http://www4.worldbank.org/afr/ssatp/Resources/PapersNotes/transport_mdg.pdf).
We used fulltext.exe, a text analysis tool to identify word frequencies and correlations (Leydesdorff, 1995; Leydesdorff and Welbers, 2011), removing stopwords based on standardized lists. This helped us compile complete (parsed) lists of the most-used words for each of the four vignettes, which we used as a basis for the semantic analyses. To more clearly demarcate the core frames emerging from clusters of words with high correlations, we conducted factor analyses with Oblimin rotation, deleting items with factor loadings of less than 0.60, or with high cross-loadings on other factors (Hinkin, 1998). Our reliability analyses of each of the factors yielded Cronbach’s alphas between 0.72 and 0.97 (included in Appendix B), thereby meeting the standard research requirements (Hinkin, 1998). We visually conveyed the results by combining Pajek (Batagelj and Mrvar, 2004) and VOSviewer (Van Eck and Waltman, 2009), open source programs used for analysis and visualization of social and semantic networks.
PRSPs or Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers comprise strategic development plans, composed by member countries of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. For more on PRSPs, see http://www.imf.org/external/np/prsp/prsp.aspx
References
Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities and Communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.
Avgerou, C. (2001). The Significance of Context in Information Systems and Organizational Change, Information Systems Journal 11(1): 43–63.
Avgerou, C. (2008). Discourses on Innovation and Development in Information Systems in Developing Countries’ Research, Journal of Information Technology 23(3): 133–146.
Avgerou, C. (2010a). Discourses on ICT and Development, Information Technologies and International Development 6(3): 1–18.
Avgerou, C. (2010b). Comments on Allen Lee’s Article ‘Retrospect and Prospect’: Information systems research in the last and next 25 years’ from a socio-theoretical IS research perspective, Journal of Information Technology 25(4): 355–357.
Banjo, G., Gordon, H. and Riverson, J. (2012). ‘Rural Transport: Improving its contribution to growth and poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa,’ Africa Transport Policy Paper, Working paper No. 93. Available at: [WWW document] http://www.ssatp.org/en/publication/rural-transport-improving-its-contribution-growth-and-poverty-reduction-sub-saharan.
Batagelj, V. and Mrvar, A. (2004). Pajek – Analysis and visualization of large networks, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.
Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An overview and assessment, Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 611–639.
Blanchard, A.L. and Markus, M.L. (2004). The Experienced Sense of a Virtual Community: Characteristics and processes, ACM Sigmis Database 35(1): 64–79.
Borgatti, S.P., Brass, D.J. and Halgin, D.S. (2014). Social Network Research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40: 1–29.
Braa, J., Monteiro, E. and Sahay, S. (2004). Networks of Action: Sustainable health information systems across developing countries, MIS Quarterly 28(3): 337–362.
Buchanan, D. and Dawson, P. (2007). Discourse and Audience: Organizational change as multi-story process, Journal of Management Studies 44(5): 669–686.
Buckwalter, N.D. (2014). The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government‐organized Participation, Public Administration Review 74(5): 573–584.
Buliung, R.N., Shimi, A.C. and Mitra, R. (2014). Automobility and Non-motorized Transport in the Global South, in A. Walks (ed.) Driving Cities, Driving Inequality, Driving Politics: The urban political economy and ecology of automobility, New York: Routledge, pp. 152–168.
Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries, Organization Science 15(5): 555–568.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1 (2nd edn,). The rise of the network society, Oxford: Blackwell.
Chigona, W., Beukes, D., Vally, J. and Tanner, M. (2009). Can Mobile Internet Help Alleviate Social Exclusion in Developing Countries?, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 36(7): 1–16.
Contu, A. and Girei, E. (2014). NGOs Management and the Value of ‘Partnerships’ for Equality in International Development: What’s in a name?, Human Relations 67(2): 205–232.
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
Cornelissen, J.P. and Werner, M.D. (2014). Putting Framing in Perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature, The Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 181–235.
Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for Transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development, London: Zed Books, pp. 75–91.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, meanings and practices, Community Development Journal 43(3): 269–283.
Cornwall, A. and Coelho, V.S. (eds.) (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, London: Zed Books.
Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Society, Malmö: Liber AB.
Edmondson, A.C. and McManus, S.E. (2007). Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1155–1179.
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 25–32.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering Development: The making and unmaking of the third world. [New in Paper] Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Eversole, R. (2010). Remaking Participation: Challenges for community development practice, Community Development Journal 47(1): 29–41.
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities, Organization Science 22(5): 1224–1239.
Ferguson, J.E. (forthcoming). Inclusive Perspectives or In-depth Learning? A longitudinal case study of past debates and future directions in knowledge management for development, Journal of Knowledge Management. in press.
Ferguson, J.E., Huysman, M.H. and Soekijad, M. (2010). Knowledge Management in Practice: Pitfalls and potentials for development, World Development 38(12): 1797–1810.
Ferguson, J.E., Soekijad, M., Huysman, M.H. and Vaast, E. (2013). Blogging for ICT4D: Reflecting and engaging with peers to build development discourse, Information Systems Journal 23(4): 307–328.
Fiss, P.C. and Hirsch, P.M. (2005). The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emergent concept, American Sociological Review 70(1): 29–52.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research, Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245.
Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books, pp. 25–41.
Gigler, B.S. (2014). Informational Capabilities: The missing link for understanding the impact of ICT on development, in B. Gigler (ed.) Closing the Feedback Loop, Can Technology Bridge the Accountability Gap? Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 17–42.
Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G. and Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia methodology, Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gough, C. and Shackley, S. (2001). The Respectable Politics of Climate Change: The epistemic communities and NGOs, International Affairs 77(2): 329–345.
Haas, E.B. (1990). When Knowledge Is Power, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Haas, P. (2004). When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructivist Approach to the Policy Process, Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 569–592.
Haas, P.M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization 46(1): 1–35.
Hayes, N. and Walsham, G. (2001). Participation in Groupware-mediated Communities of Practice: A socio-political analysis of knowledge working, Information and Organization 11(4): 263–288.
Hayes, N. and Westrup, C. (2012). Context and the Processes of ICT for Development, Information and Organization 22(1): 23–36.
Heeks, R. (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations, The Information Society 18(2): 101–112.
Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development, Computer 41(6): 26–33.
Heeks, R. (2010). Development 2.0: The IT-enabled transformation of international development, Communications of the ACM 53(4): 22–24.
Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books.
Hine, C.E. (2005). Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet, Oxford/New York: Berg.
Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires, Organizational Research Methods 1(1): 104–121.
Howe, J. and Richards, P. (1984). Rural Roads and Poverty Alleviation, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
International Monetary Fund (last updated 19th May 2015). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) Available at: [WWW document] http://www.imf.org/external/np/prsp/prsp.aspx.
Kane, G.C., Alavi, M., Labianca, J. and Borgatti, S. (2014). Integrating Social Networks and Information Systems: A review and framework for research, MIS Quarterly 38(1): 275–304.
Kane, G.C., Majchrzak, A., Johnson, J. and Chenisern, L. (2009). A Longitudinal Model of Perspective Making and Perspective Taking Within Fluid Online Collectives, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Paper 10: 1–17; Phoenix, Arizona.
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow, Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 1–13.
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2011). Organizations as Discursive Constructions: A Foucauldian approach, Organization Studies 32(9): 1247–1271.
Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Challenge of Scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications, Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.
Leydesdorff, L. and Welbers, K. (2011). The Semantic Mapping of Words and Co-words in Contexts, Journal of Informetrics 5(3): 469–475.
Madon, S. (2000). The Internet and Socio-economic Development: Exploring the interaction, Information Technology and People 13(2): 85–101.
Madon, S., Reinhard, N., Roode, D. and Walsham, G. (2009). Digital Inclusion Projects in Developing Countries: Processes of institutionalization, Information Technology for Development 15(2): 95–107.
Maitlis, S. and Lawrence, T.B. (2007). Triggers and Enablers of Sensegiving in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 57–84.
Marin, A. and Wellman, B. (2010). Social Network Analysis: An introduction, in J. Scott and P. Carrington (eds.) Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: SAGE, pp. 1–8.
McFarlane, C. (2006). Knowledge, Learning and Development: A post-rationalist approach, Progress in Development Studies 6(4): 287–305.
Merriam-Webster dictionary Available at [WWW document] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.
Mitiku, T.N. (2009). A Framework for a Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor Transport Strategy: Guidance Note, Washington DC: World Bank.
Molla, A. and Heeks, R. (2007). Exploring e-Commerce Benefits for Businesses in a Developing Country, The Information Society 23(2): 95–108.
Mosse, E.L. and Sahay, S. (2003). Counter Networks, Communication and Health Information Systems, in M. Korpela, R. Montealegre and A. Poulymenakou (eds.) Organizational Information Ststems in the Context of Globalization, New York: Springer, pp. 35–51.
Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) (2015). Progress Report (2013–2014) of the MDB Working Group on Sustainable Transport. African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (ADB), Development Bank of Latin America (CAF), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), European Investment Bank (EIB), Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), World Bank (WB). Available at: [WWW document] http://www.adb.org/documents/progress-report-2013-2014-mdb-working-group-sustainable-transport.
Njoh, A.J. (2008). Implications of Africa’s Transportation Systems for Development in the Era of Globalization, The Review of Black Political Economy 35(4): 147–162.
O’Mahony, S. and Bechky, B.A. (2008). Boundary Organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies, Administrative Science Quarterly 53(3): 422–459.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing, Organization Science 13(3): 249–273.
Powell, M. (2006). Which Knowledge? Whose Reality? An Overview of Knowledge Used in the Development Sector, Development in Practice 16(6): 518–532.
Puri, S.K. (2007). Integrating Scientific with Indigenous Knowledge: Constructing knowledge alliances for land management in India, MIS Quarterly 31(2): 355–379.
Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to Communities of Practice, Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 623–639.
Rossi, B. (2004). Revisiting Foucauldian Approaches: Power dynamics in development projects, Journal of Development Studies 40(6): 1–29.
Schreyögg, G. and Sydow, J. (2010). Crossroads. Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms, Organization Science 21(6): 1251–1262.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smelser, N.J. and Marx, G.T. (2011). Theory of Collective Behavior, New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro, LLC.
Taylor, M. (2007). Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces, Urban studies 44(2): 297–317.
Tolley, R.S. and Turton, B.J. (1995). Transport Systems, Policy and Planning: A geographical approach, Harlow: Longman group.
Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Eck, N. and Waltman, L. (2009). Software Survey: VOSviewer, A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping, Scientometrics 84(2): 523–538.
Vasconcellos, E.A. (2013). Urban Transport Environment and Equity: The case for developing countries, New York: Earthscan.
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A. and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the Qualitative-quantitative Divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 37(1): 21–54.
Venkatesh, V. and Sykes, T.A. (2013). Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A longitudinal field study in a village in India, Information Systems Research 24(2): 239–260.
Wagner, C., Cheung, K., Lee, F. and Ip, R. (2003). Enhancing e-Government in Developing Countries: Managing knowledge through virtual communities, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 14(4): 1–20.
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research, European Journal of Information Systems 15(3): 320–330.
Walsham, G. (2012). Are We Making a Better World with ICTs? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field, Journal of Information Technology 27(2): 87–93.
Walsham, G., Robey, D. and Sahay, S. (2007). Foreword: Special issue on information systems in developing countries, MIS Quarterly 31(2): 317–326.
Wareham, J., Fox, P.B. and Cano Giner, J.L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance, Organization Science 25(4): 1195–1215.
Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly 29(1): 35–57.
Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. and Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging Stakeholders through Social Networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook, Public Relations Review 35(2): 102–106.
Watkins, S.C., Swidler, A. and Hannan, T. (2012). Outsourcing Social Transformation: Development NGOs as organizations, Sociology 38: 285–315.
Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K.M. and Crowston, K. (2012). Perceived Discontinuities and Constructed Continuities in Virtual Work, Information Systems Journal 22(1): 29–52.
Williams, G. (2004). Towards a Repoliticization of Participatory Development: Political capabilities and spaces of empowerment, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books, pp. 92–109.
Zheng, Y. (2009). Different Spaces for e‐Development: What can we learn from the capability approach?, Information Technology for Development 15(2): 66–82.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Marleen Huysman, Ed Sleebos, Wouter van Atteveldt, Tim Unwin, Shirin Madon and three anonymous reviewers, and of course, the research participants and ‘GRIT’ online community.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, J., Soekijad, M. Multiple interests or unified voice? Online communities as intermediary spaces for development. J Inf Technol 31, 358–381 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.25
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.25