Abt, H.A. (2007) ‘The future of single-authored papers’, Scientometrics 73(3): 353–358.CrossRef
Ackers, L. (2008) ‘Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination?’ Minerva 46(4): 411–435.CrossRef
Angrosino, M.V. (1997) ‘Among the savage anthros: Reflections on the SAS oral history project’, Southern Anthropologist 24(2): 25–32.
Angrosino, M.V. and Mays de Perez, K.A. (2003) ‘Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 673–702.
Biagioli, M. (1998) ‘The instability of authorship: credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine’, The FASEB Journal 12(1): 3–16.
Blumer, H. (1954) ‘What is wrong with social theory?’ American Sociological Review 18(1): 3–10.CrossRef
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bowen, G.A. (2006) ‘Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(3): 1–9.
Bourdieu, P. (1975) ‘The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason’, Social Science Information 14(6): 19–47.CrossRef
Chamaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide for Qualitative Analysis, London: Sage.
Edge, D. (1979) ‘Quantitative measurements of communication in science: A critical review’, History of Science 17: 102–134.CrossRef
European Commission. (2000) Presidency Conclusions, Lisbon: European Council.
Felt, U. (ed) (2009) Knowing and Living in Academic Research. Convergence and Heterogeneity in Research Cultures in the European Context, Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (2013) ‘The reflexive peer-to-peer-interview. Developing a method to study the intertwinement of epistemic, institutional and social aspects in scientists’ biographical narratives’, Qualitative Research, Manuscript in preparation.
Felt, U., Fochler, M. and Strassnig, M. (2010) ‘Experimente partizipativer ELSA-forschung. Eine methodenpolitische reflexion’, in E. Grießler and H. Rohracher (eds.) Genomforschung – Politik – Gesellschaft. Perspektiven auf ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte der Genomforschung, Sonderband ÖZS, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 33–67.
Fontana, A. and Frey, J.H. (2003) ‘The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 61–106.
Gunasekara, C. (2007) ‘Pivoting the centre: Reflections on undertaking qualitative interviewing in academia’, Qualitative Research 7(4): 461.CrossRef
Hackett, E. (ed) (2005) ‘Special guest-edited issue on scientific collaboration’, Social Studies of Science 35(5): 667–672.CrossRef
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1983) Ethnography. Principles in Practice, London & New York: Tavistock.
Heinze, T. and Kuhlmann, S. (2008) ‘Across institutional boundaries? Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience’, Research Policy 37(5): 888–899.CrossRef
Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. (1997) ‘Active interviewing’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, Method and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 113–129.
Katz, J.S. and Martin, B.R. (1997) ‘What is research collaboration?’ Research Policy 26(1): 1–18.CrossRef
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A. and Torka, M. (eds) (2007) Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions, Bielefeld: Transcript.
Laudel, G. (2001) ‘Collaboration, creativity and rewards: Why and how scientists collaborate’, International Journal of Technology Management 22(7/8): 762–781.CrossRef
Laudel, G. (2002) ‘What do we measure by co-authorships?’ Research Evaluation 11(1): 3–15.CrossRef
Laudel, G. and Gläser, J. (2008) ‘From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers’, Higher Education 55(3): 387–406.CrossRef
Macfarlane, B. (2005) ‘The disengaged academic: The retreat from citizenship’, Higher Education Quarterly 59(4): 296–312.CrossRef
Merton, R.K. (1942) The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, R. and Kenney, M.J. (2013) ‘Agential conversations. On interviewing life scientists and the politics of mundane research practices’, Science as Culture, Submitted manuscript.
Nature. (2003) ‘Victims of success’, Nature 422(6929): 354–355.
Nature. (2009) ‘Authorship policies. Editorial’, Nature 458(7242): 1078.
Nowotny, H. and Felt, U. (1997) After the Breakthrough. The Emergence of High-Temperature Superconductivity as a Research Field, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science. Knowledge in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity.
Parker, J.N., Vermeulen, N. and Penders, B. (eds) (2010) Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.
Pickstone, J.V. (2000) Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Price, D.J.de Solla (1963) Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
Salonius, A. (2012) ‘Social organization of work in biomedical labs in leading universities in Canada: Socio-historical dynamics and the influence of research funding’, Social Studies of Science, Manuscript accepted pending revisions.
Scaffidi, A.K. and Berman, J.E. (2011) ‘A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment’, Higher Education 62(6): 1–14.CrossRef
Science. (2005) ‘Not your father’s postdoc. Editorial feature’, Science 308(5722): 717–718.
Science. (2010) ‘Promoting scientific standards. Editorial’, Science 327(5961): 12.
Shapin, S. (1990) ‘The mind is its own place. Science and solitude in seventeenth-century England’, Science in Context 4(1): 91–218.
Shrum, W.M. (2010) ‘Collaborationism’, in J.N. Parker, N. Vermeulen and B. Penders (eds.) Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 247–258.
Shrum, W.M., Genuth, J. and Chompalov, I. (2007) Structures of Scientific Collaborations, Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
Silverman, D. (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, London: Sage.
Sommerlund, J. and Boutaiba, S. (2007) ‘Borders of the boundaryless career’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 20(4): 525–538.CrossRef
Stephan, P. (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Strathern, M. (ed) (2000) Audit Cultures. Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge.CrossRef
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage.
The Scientist. (2006) ‘Are we training too many scientists?’ The Scientist 20(9): 42.
The Scientist. (2007) ‘Managing authorship’, The Scientist 21(11): 92.
Torka, M. (2009) Die Projektförmigkeit der Forschung. Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung 3, Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef
van den Hoonaard, W.C. (1997) Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vermeulen, N. (2009) Supersizing Science: On Building Large-Scale Research Projects in Biology, Maastricht: Maastricht University Press.
Weinberg, A.M. (1961) ‘Impact of large-scale science on the United States’, Science 134(3473): 161–164.CrossRef
Wray, K.B. (2002) ‘The epistemic significance of collaborative research’, Philosophy of Science 69(1): 150–168.CrossRef
Wray, K.B. (2006) ‘Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37(3): 505–514.CrossRef
Ynalvez, M.A. and Shrum, W.M. (2010) ‘Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country’, Research Policy 40(2): 204–216.CrossRef