Skip to main content
Log in

Bologna — Realising Old or New Ideals of Quality?

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the meanings of quality in the Humboldtian university ideal and in the Bologna process, especially related to issues of institutional autonomy, academic freedom and the integration of teaching and research. The article gives an overview of current practices associated with quality and quality assurance in Germany and Norway. Although differences can be found in how the concept of quality is interpreted in the two countries, it is suggested that there are several possible links to be found between the ideas underpinning Humboldt and Bologna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. What can be interpreted as singular arrangement should be understood on the grounds that universities were to train loyal citizens to the state, who eventually would fill the ranks of government (bureaucracy), army and industry. Hence, the students recruited in these arrangements were already loyal citizens and would contribute to further the states mission.

References

  • Archer, M. (1986) ‘Social Origins of Educational Systems’, in J. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. (ed.) (1999) Mythos Humboldt. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der deutschen Universität, Wien: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becham, G. and Stehr, N. (2002) ‘Profile. The legacy of Niklas Luhmann’, Society 3 (2): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2004) Sustaining Change in Universities, Berkshire: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (2007) ‘Will Market Competition Assure Academic Quality?’, in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds.) Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 47–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2004) ‘Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory’, Higher Education 47: 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005a) Mobilising the Brainpower of Europe, Brussels: Communication from the Commission.

  • European Commission. (2005b) The European Charter for Researchers, Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, Human Resources and Mobility.

  • Eurydice. (2005) Focus on the Structure of Higher Education in Europe 2004/05. National Trends in the Bologna Process, Brussels: Eurydice.

  • Green, A. (1990) Education and State Formation – The Rise of Education Systems in England, France and the USA, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, W.von (1964) Schriften zur Politik und zum Bildungswesen, Vol. IV, Berlin: Rütten & Loening.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landtag Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2006) Ausschussprotokoll der 11. Sitzung des Ausschusses für Innovation, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie, 30 March 2006.

  • Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Westerheijden, D. and Stensaker, B. (2008) Evaluation of NOKUT. Nokut's National Role, Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedmann, S.-E. (1993) ‘In Search of Isis – General Education in Germany and Sweden’, in S. Rothblatt and B. Wittrock (eds.) The European and American University Since 1800, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maasen, S. and Weingart, P. (2000) Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P.A.M. and Olsen, J.P. (eds.) (2007) University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2007) Die akademische Elite. Zus sozialen Konstruktion wissenschaftlicher Exzellenz, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1988) ‘On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988’, European Journal of Education 23 (1/2): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT. (2006) Evalueringen av allmennlærerutdanningen i Norge, Oslo: NOKUT.

  • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NOU. (2000) Frihet med ansvar. Om høgre utdanning i Norge, Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.

  • Nybom, T. (2007) ‘A Rule-governed Community of Scholars: The Humboldt Vision in the History of the European University’, in P.A.M. Maassen and J.P. Olsen (eds.) University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 55–79.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1988) OECD vurdering av norsk utdanningspolitikk, Oslo: Aschehoug.

  • Pierre, J. and Peters, B.G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaen, F.D. (2006) Akkreditering og sakkyndighet. En analyse av den reviderte akkrediteringen av bachelorstudiene i sykepleie i Norge, Oslo: Senter for profesjonsstudier, Høgskolen i Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, S. and Tauch, C. (2005) Trends IV: European Universities Implementing Bologna, Brussels: European University Association (EUA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. and Winnes, M. (2001) ‘Jenseits von Humboldt? Muster und Entwicklungspfade des Verhältnisses von Forschung und Lehre in verschiedenen europäischen Hochschulsystemen’, in E. Stölting and U. Schimank (eds.) Die Krise der Universitäten. Leviathan Sonderheft 20/2001, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 295–325.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S. and Westerheijden, D.F. (eds.) (2004) Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1991) ‘Die Universität ist verrottet’, Der Spiegel 50.

  • Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.meld. nr. 27. (2000–2001) Gjør din plikt – krev din rett. Kvalitetsreform av høyere utdanning, Oslo: Statens trykksakssentral.

  • Stensaker, B., Enders, J. and de Boer, H. (2006) The Extent and Impact of Higher Education Governance Reforms Across Europe, Comparative Analysis, Enschede: CHEPS/CHE/ESMU/NIFU STEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2006a) Institusjonelle kvalitetsystemer i høyere utdanning – vil de bidra til bedre kvalitet? Oslo: Norges forskningsråd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2006b) Kvalitet som forhandling: NOKUT i norsk høyere utdanning 2003–2006, Oslo: Norges forskningsråd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. and Harvey, L. (2006) ‘Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education’, Higher Education Policy 19: 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. (2007) ‘States and Europe and Quality of Higher Education’, in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds.) Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 73–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serrano-Velarde, K., Stensaker, B. Bologna — Realising Old or New Ideals of Quality?. High Educ Policy 23, 213–226 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.1

Keywords

Navigation