Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating the Neighbors: A Dynamic Panel Analysis of the EU-ENP Countries’ Trade Relations

  • Article
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates the impact of trade relations among the European Union (EU) 7 and the European Neighborhood Policy countries, the ENPCs, on the economic performance of the latter. The analysis uses panel data for 14 ENPCs over the period 2000–2011 and recently developed panel cointegration techniques. The results of the analysis indicate that the effects of trade integration with the EU on ENPCs growth performance may depend on the development gap between trade partners. Deeper trade integration with the higher-income EU countries is found to have a negative impact on the growth performance of the ENPCs. In contrast, deeper trade integration with the middle- and lower-income EU countries is found to have a positive growth impact. The findings of the paper highlight the limits of integration among unequal partners, but also the need for a geographically more balanced pattern of trade relations that will improve growth prospects in the external and internal EU periphery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is beyond the purposes of this paper to provide a detailed description of the panel unit roots tests used.

  2. Libya and Palestine are not included in the analysis.

  3. Because of the fact that the data are in USD, the trade data are likely to be affected by the exchange rate development with respect to the currency of each trading partner, taking the logarithmic first differences in our study eliminates the potential exchange rate bias (Jun, 2013).

References

  • Akaike, H . 1974: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (6): 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. 1974: (ed). Accumulation on a world scale. Monthly Review Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiti, M . 1997: Specialization patterns in Europe, Center of Economic performance: LSE. CEPR Discussion Paper, 363.

  • Arellano, M and Bond, SR . 1991: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baran, P . 1957: (ed). The political economy of growth. Monthly Review Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S and Strobl, E . 2005: The dynamics of regional inequalities. European Commission Economic Papers 229.

  • Borjas, GT . 1989: Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review 23 (3): 457–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J . 2000: The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics 15: 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M . 1998: Economic geography, industry location and trade: The evidence. World Economy 21 (6): 775–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M, Crozet, M and Koenig-Soubeyran, P . 2004: Enlargement and the EU periphery: The impact of changing market potential. The World Economy 27 (6): 853–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M and Elliott, R . 1998: Adjustment to the European single market: Inferences from intra-industry trade patterns. Journal of Economic Studies 25: 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F and Ciccarelli, M . 2004: Forecasting and turning point predictions in a Bayesian panel VAR model. Journal of Econometrics 120 (2): 327–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F and Ciccarelli, M . 2009: Estimating multi-country VAR models. International Economic Review 50: 929–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A . 2002: Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46: 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, G, Ellison, G and Glaeser, E . 2002: Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M . 2004: European Neighborhood Policy: Strategy of placebo? CEPS Working Document 215.

  • Emmanuel, A . 1969/1972: Unequal exchange: A study on the imperialism of trade. Monthly Review Press: New York (translated by Pearce B.).

  • Engle, RF and Granger, CWJ . 1987: Co-Integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55 (2): 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, RF and Yoo, BS . 1987: Forecasting and testing in co-integrated systems. Journal of Econometrics 35: 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2004: COM 373 FINAL: European Neighborhood Policy Strategy Paper. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels.

  • Greenwood, MJ . 1975: Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (2): 397–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlik, P, Astrov, V, Holzner, M, Hunya, G, Mara, I, Richter, S, Stöllinger, R and Vidovic, H . 2012: European neighborhood – Challenges and opportunities for EU competitiveness, WIIW Research Reports, 382 Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.

  • Head, K and Mayer, T . 2003: The empirics of agglomeration and trade, CEPR Discussion Paper, 3985. Center for Economic Policy Research, UK.

  • Heckscher, EF . 1919/1991: The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. In: Flam, H and Flanders, MJ (eds). Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA 43–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D, Newey, W and Rosen, HS . 1988: Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56 (6): 1371–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, KS, Pesaran, MH and Shin, Y . 2003: Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, BF and Whiteman, CH . 1994: Supplanting the ‘Minnesota’ prior: Forecasting macroeconomic time series using real business cycle model priors. Journal of Monetary Economics 34 (3): 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S . 1988: Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12: 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S . 2013: International trade and economic growth: Evidence from Latin American countries. Journal of Economic Research 18: 259–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallioras, D and Petrakos, G . 2010: Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: Evidence from the EU new member-states regions. Annals of Regional Science 45: 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallioras, D, Topaloglou, L and Venieris, S . 2009: Tracing the determinants of economic cross-border interaction in the European Union. Spatium International Review 21: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallioras, D and Pinna, AM . 2013: Trade activity between the EU and its neighboring countries: Trends and potential, SEARCH Working Paper, 2/19. University of Thessaly, Greece.

  • Koopmann, G and Wilhelm, M . 2010: EU Trade policy in the age of bilateralism. Intereconomics 45 (5): 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, PR . 1979: Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics 9: 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, PR . 1991: Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, PR . 1993: First nature, second nature and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science 33: 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A, Lin, CF and Chu, C . 2002: Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limao, N and Venables, AJ . 2001: Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage and transport costs. World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, DV and Smith, AFM . 1972: Bayes estimates for the linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34 (1): 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, B, Matraves, CA and Moffatt, P . 2001: Industrial concentration and market integration in the European Union. Economica 68: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, GS and Wu, S . 1999: A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, D . 1992: Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (4): 678–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, NC and Sul, D . 2003: Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (5): 655–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P and Ottaviano, GIP . 2001: Growth and agglomeration. International Economic Review 42 (9): 947–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, J . 2001: Imported machinery and growth in LDCs. Journal of Development Economics 65: 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melachroinos, KA . 2002: European integration and the spatial dynamics of manufacturing-employment change. Environment and Planning A 34: 2017–2036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V and Borrell, M . 2012: Political and political economy literature on the ENP: Issues and implications, SEARCH Working Paper, 1/05. LSE, UK.

  • Monastiriotis, V, Kallioras, D and Petrakos, G . 2014: The regional impact of EU association agreements: Lessons for the ENP from the CEE experience, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, 80/2014.

  • Monastiriotis, V and Petrakos, G . 2010: Twenty years of economic transition in the Balkans: Transition failures and development challenges. Southeastern Europe 34: 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V, Petrakos, G, Kallioras, D, Djurdjev, B, Arsenovic, D and Dragisevic, V . 2010: Serbia’s integration with the EU: Analysis of the impact on Vojvodina, Report submitted to the Vojvodina Centre for Strategic Economic Studies (Vojvodina-CESS). LSE, UK.

  • Niebuhr, A . 2006: Market access and regional disparities: New economic geography in Europe. Annals of Regional Science 40: 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, B . 1933: (ed). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, GIP and Puga, D . 1998: Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the new economic geography. World Economy 21 (6): 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P . 1997: ‘Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity’, Department of Economics, Indiana University, mimeo.

  • Phillips, PCB and Moon, HR . 1999: Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67: 1057–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G . 1997: A European macro-region in the making? The Balkan trade relations of Greece. European Planning Studies 5 (4): 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G . 2008: Regional inequalities in Europe: Reflections on evidence, theory and policy. Town Planning Review 79 (5): 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G, Fotopoulos, G and Kallioras, D . 2012: Peripherality and integration: Industrial growth and decline in the Greek regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30: 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G, Kallioras, D and Anagnostou, A . 2011: Regional convergence and growth in Europe: Understanding patterns and determinants. European Urban and Regional Studies 18 (4): 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G and Pitelis, C . 2001: Peripherality and integration: The experience of Greece as a member of the EU and its implications for the Balkan economies in Transition. In: Petrakos and Totev (eds). The Development of the Balkan Region. Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G, Tsiapa, M and Kallioras, D . 2014: Regional inequalities in the ENPCs: The effects of growth and integration. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Forthcoming.

  • Ricardo, D . 1817: (ed). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P . 1986: Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P . 1948: International trade and the equalization of factor prices. Economic Journal 58: 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A . 1776: (ed). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wesselink, E and Boschma, R . 2012: Overview of the European Neighborhood Policy: Its history, structure and implemented policy measures, SEARCH Working Paper, 1/04. Utrecht University, Netherlands.

  • Woolcock, S . 2010: EU trade and investment policymaking after the Lisbon Treaty. Intereconomics 45 (1): 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Thessaly,

    Ageliki Anagnostou

  2. Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly,

    Dimitris Kallioras & George Petrakos

Authors
  1. Ageliki Anagnostou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitris Kallioras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George Petrakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anagnostou, A., Kallioras, D. & Petrakos, G. Integrating the Neighbors: A Dynamic Panel Analysis of the EU-ENP Countries’ Trade Relations. Comp Econ Stud 58, 17–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.23

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation