Abstract
This paper is a contribution to the discussion on how to incorporate community participation into the urban design process within a pedagogical context. It is based on an outreach project by a class in the city planning graduate program at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. The project included an Internet survey to gather community input for a contentious riverfront site in Redding, CA. The responses permitted a study of perceptions, attitudes and expectations about the city and the project area, and an examination of design alternatives. The Internet survey provided 864 responses and generated a rich amount of information that was utilized in the programming and selection of design concepts for the project. The site's proprietors, the community and the media were in full support of the final project, which prompted the city council to appoint a special committee to oversee the advancement of specific policies and recommendations for the area's future development. The effectiveness of the method of public input and the successful project process suggest important pedagogical and professional implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is an extended and revised version of a paper originally presented at the International Seminar on Urban Form in Ouro Preto, Brazil, 2007.
This format is set by the state. See State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research at www.opr.ca.gov.
See Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (2009). Guide to Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Urban and Regional Planning. 14th edn. ACSP. See also www.acsp.org.
Most students hold bachelor's degree in Environmental and Urban Studies, Geography, History, Biology and so on. In some classes, there are one or two students with a background in landscape architecture and, more rarely, in architecture.
The class instructor was Vicente del Rio, and Daniel Levi was the consultant for environmental psychology and survey construction and analysis.
Cal Poly's undergraduate students take a graphic skills class and three urban design studios.
The article ‘Seeking Redding's Future on the Riverfront’ by Vicente del Rio and Sean Nicholas appeared in the Opinion section of the Record Searchlight on 6 February 2005.
The class used <surveymonkey.com> as the online resource to construct, administer and gather the survey results.
Redding's the Record Searchlight published an extensive and illustrated first-page article (local section) titled ‘Designs shape riverfront – Students will unveil plan for Park Marina on Saturday’ setting the stage for the public presentation. There were more than 100 members of the community in the presentation.
References
Appleyard, D. (1982) Three kinds of Urban design practice. In: M. Pittas and A. Farebee (eds.) Education for URBAN DESIGN. New York: The Institute for URBAN DESIGN.
Bachelor, P. and Lewis, D. (eds.) (1985) URBAN DESIGN in Action, Student Publication, Vol. 29. Raleigh, NC: School of Design, North Carolina State University/American Institute of Architects.
Comerio, M. (1984) Community design: Idealism and entrepreneurship. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 1: 227–243.
Hoch, C., Dalton, L. and So, F. (2000) Introduction: Planning for people and places. In: C. Hoch, L. Dalton and F. So (eds.) The Practice of Local Government, 3rd edn. Washington DC: International City–County Management Association/American Planning Association.
Dutton, T. (ed.) (2001) Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural Politics and Pedagogy. New York: Bergin & Gavey.
Forsyth, A. (2004) Responses to the graduate planning school study – The view from design. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 No. 1: 23–27.
Fulton, W. (1999) Guide to California Planning, 2nd edn. Point Arenas, CA: Solano Press.
Porterfield, G. and Hall, K. (2001) Community by Design: New Urbanism for Suburbs and Small Communities. New York: McGraw Hill.
Salama, A. (1995) New Trends in Architectural Education. Raleigh, NC: Published by the author/Tailored Text & Unlimited Publishing.
Sanoff, H. (1977) Methods of Architectural Programming. Stroudsburg, PA: Downden, Hutchison & Ross.
Sanoff, H. (1990) Partipatory Design: Theory and Techniques. Raleigh, NC: Published by the author.
Sanoff, H. (2000) Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schuman, T. (1991) Forms of resistance: Politics, culture and architecture. In: T. Dutton (ed.) Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural Politics and Pedagogy. New York: Bergin & Gavey.
Walters, D. and Brown, L. (2004) Design First: Design Based Planning for Communities. Oxford: Architecture Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
del Rio, V., Levi, D. Internet-based surveys and urban design education: A community outreach graduate project in Redding, CA. Urban Des Int 14, 192–206 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.20
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.20