Skip to main content
Log in

Classification analysis for simulation of the duration of machine breakdowns

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Machine failure can have a significant impact on the throughput of manufacturing systems, therefore accurate modelling of breakdowns in manufacturing simulation models is essential. Finite mixture distributions have been successfully used by Ford Motor Company to model machine breakdown durations in simulation models of engine assembly lines. These models can be very complex, with a large number of machines. To simplify the modelling we propose a method of grouping machines with similar distributions of breakdown durations, which we call the Arrows Classification Method, where the Two-Sample Cramér-von-Mises statistic is used to measure the similarity of two sets of the data. We evaluate the classification procedure by comparing the throughput of a simulation model when run with mixture models fitted to individual machine breakdown durations; mixture models fitted to group breakdown durations; and raw data. Details of the methods and results of the classification will be presented, and demonstrated using an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TY (1962). The distribution of the two-sample Cramér-von-Mises criterion . Ann Math Stat 33(3): 1148–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blache KM and Shrivastava AB (1993). Reliability and Maintainability of Machinery and Equipment for Effective Maintenance. Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress and Exposition: Detroit, MI, pp 19–23.

  • Bradford TC and Martin KF (1993). Modelling the breakdown behavior of transfer line machines for use in computer simulation . Int J Model Simul 13(1): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng RCH (1998). Bayesian model selection when the number of components is unknown. In: Medeiros DJ, Watson EF, Carson JS and Manivannan MS (eds). Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 653–659.

  • Cheng RCH and Currie CSM (2003). Prior and candidate models in the Bayesian analysis of finite mixtures. In: Chick S, Sanchez PJ, Ferrin D and Morrice DJ (eds). Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 392–398.

  • Currie CSM and Lu L (2009). Optimal scheduling using length-of-stay data for diverse routine procedures . In: McClean S, Millard P, El-Darzi E and Nugent CD (eds). Intelligent Patient Management Vol. 189. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 193–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC and Hinkley DV (1997). Bootstrap Methods and their Application . Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B and Tibshirani RJ (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap . CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel A and Graves RJ (2006). Electronic system reliability: Collating prediction models . IEEE Trans Dev Mater Rel 6(2): 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N and Kotz S (1970). Continuous Univariate Distributions-1. Vol. 2. Wiley: New York.

  • Ladbrook J (1998). Breakdowns modelling—An inquest. Master in Philosophy, University of Birmingham.

  • Lanner (2008). WITNESS 2008 User Manual. Lanner Group: Redditch.

  • Law AM (2007). Simulation Modeling and Analysis . McGraw-Hill: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu L and Currie CSM (2010). Evaluation of the arrows method for classification of data. Asia-Pac J Opnl Res 27(1): 121–142.

  • Proschan F (1963). Theoretical explanation of observed decreasing failure rate . Technometrics 5: 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens MA (1974). EDF statistics for goodness-of-fit and some comparisons . J Am Stat Assoc 69(347): 730–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner MAF and Wilson JR (1993). Using univariate Bézier distributions to model simulation input processes. In: Evans G, Mollaghasemi H, Russell E and Biles w (eds). Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 365–373.

  • Wagner MAF and Wilson JR (1996). Recent developments in input modeling with Bézier distributions. In: Charnes J, Morrice D, Brunner D and Swain J (eds). Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 1448–1456.

  • Watson GF (1992). MIL reliability: A new approach . IEEE Spectrum 29(8): 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch PD (1983). The statistical analysis of simulation results . In: Lavenberg SS (ed). The Computer Performance Modeling Handbook. Academic Press: New York, pp. 268–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan L and English JR (1997). Economic cost modeling of environmental-stress-screening and burn-in . IEEE T Reliab 46(2): 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Lanner Group for the free use of a student licence during this project and to Ford's Power Train Manufacturing Engineering department for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, L., Currie, C., Cheng, R. et al. Classification analysis for simulation of the duration of machine breakdowns. J Oper Res Soc 62, 760–767 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.33

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.33

Keywords

Navigation