Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequencing the expansion of geographic scope and foreign operations by “born global” firms

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Born global” firms are not actually “born” global, but rather internationalize rapidly from their inception by expanding their geographic scope and extent of foreign operations. However, it remains unclear whether such firms: (1) simultaneously expand along both dimensions; (2) focus on expanding along a single dimension at a given time, and switch interchangeably between expanding geographic scope and extent of foreign operations in subsequent periods; or (3) stick solely to a specific internationalization path over several subsequent periods. This study theorizes and empirically demonstrates that born global firms stick to a dominant internationalization path over subsequent periods. Arguably, this phenomenon reflects managerial efforts to reduce the perceived risk of internationalization, and their preference to develop and leverage capabilities that are specific to either of the internationalization paths until the economies of further expanding this path are exhausted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Alternative definitions often used in the literature are: entry mode, operation mode or business mode.

  2. Take, for example, the capability to deal with regulatory authorities, which is important both in foreign market entry and in the expansion of operations in an existing foreign country.

  3. Relaxation of this constraint by the recruitment of additional managers is often ineffective, owing to the time and attention that new managers require from current managers until they become effectively embedded in existing firm-specific routines (Penrose, 1959; Tan & Mahoney, 2005).

  4. To clarify this point, increasing returns in capability development imply that if a born global firm is able to reach a (conceptual) level of, say, ten when developing a single capability, it is expected to reach a level that is lower than five (for each capability) when developing two sets of distinct capabilities at once.

  5. This figure is consistent with extant literature that usually refers to “short-term” changes as changes occurring within a period of up to 6 years (Chatterjee & Wernerfelt, 1991; Kumar, 2009; Silverman, 1999).

  6. While formally this definition implies that several different subsidiaries may each be in charge of a specific value chain activity in a given country, in the current sample multiple value chain activities were always executed within a single subsidiary. This is probably the outcome of the relatively small size of the sampled firms (see Table 1).

  7. There were not enough observations in the dataset to allow longer lags.

  8. This result is consistent for the required conditions for using true change measures, as discussed in Bergh and Fairbank (2002).

  9. The firms were split according to median sales in 2006 (end of the last period) in order to avoid a situation in which firm-period observations of the same firm would be split between the two subsamples.

References

  • Agarwal, S., & Ramasawi, S. N. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., & Pantzalis, C. 1996. Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (4): 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey, T. L., & Miner, A. S. 1992. Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (5): 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P. S., & Kotabe, M. 1997. Antecedents and performance implications of channel integration in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (1): 145–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., & Drogendijk, R. 2007. Internationalising in small, incremental or larger steps? Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (7): 1132–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 2002. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R. 2003. Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: Evidence from Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (3): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, R. D., & Fairbank, J. F. 2002. Measuring and testing change in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (4): 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T. 1984. Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12 (2): 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1): 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, T. 1994. Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (4): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. 2003. A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, M. R. 1982. Export development strategies: US promotion policies. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2003. Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (3): 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35 (12): 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. 2009. The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (6): 1005–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 1991. Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2003. Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (13): 1289–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 67 (2): 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashai, N., & Almor, T. 2004. Gradually internationalizing “born global” firms: An oxymoron? International Business Review, 13 (4): 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. 1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2): 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. 1989. Services and service intensity in international trade. Weltwirtschaffliches Archiv – Review of World Economics, 125 (1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutzschenreuter, T., & Voll, J. C. 2008. Performance effects of “added culture distance” in the path of international expansion: The case of German multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. 1996. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. -E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. -E. 1990. The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7 (4): 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12 (3): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V. 2001. First steps in internationalisation: Concepts and evidence from a sample of small high-technology firms. Journal of International Management, 7 (3): 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., & Coviello, N. E. 2005. Internationalization: Conceptualizing an entrepreneurial process of behavior in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. 1986. Elements of econometrics, (2nd ed.) New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. 1996. The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. In S. T. Cavusgil & T. Madsen (Eds), Advances in international marketing, Vol. 8: 11–26. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2004. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2): 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4): 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. M. V. 2009. The relationship between product and international diversification: The effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (1): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Rugman, A. M. 2007. Real options and the theory of foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 16 (6): 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Beamish, P. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6–7): 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Beamish, P. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4): 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1): 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (4): 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. 1994. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9 (6): 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. 1992. A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (2): 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. 1998. The role of duration in multinational investment strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (2): 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (5): 699–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Zahra, S. 2007. The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, S., & Perez, P. D. 2007. Prior conditions and early international commitment: The mediating role of domestic mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T., & Shaver, J. M. 2011. Internationalization revisited: The big step hypothesis. Global Strategy Journal, forthcoming.

  • Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S. D. 1981. The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 12 (2): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10 (3): 435–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, F. R. 1987. Entry strategy for international markets. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. 1986. New theories of the multinational enterprise: An assessment of internalization theory. Bulletin of Economic Research, 38 (2): 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R. B. 1996. Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (9): 739–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 2000. How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1227–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. S. 1999. Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science, 45 (8): 1109–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stray, S., Bridgewater, S., & Murray, G. 2001. The internationalisation process of small, technology-based firms: Market selection, mode choice and degree of internationalisation. Journal of International Global Marketing, 15 (1): 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26 (2): 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2007. The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries: The Penrose effect. Management International Review, 47 (2): 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. Y., & Tikoo, S. 1999. Operational flexibility and market valuation of earnings. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (8): 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 1977. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, 87 (346): 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2009. World investment report. Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • Verbeke, A., Li, L., & Goerzen, A. 2009. Toward more effective research on the multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review, 49 (2): 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (7): 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. 2004. Internationalization speed and cost efficiency: Evidence from Germany. International Business Review, 13 (4): 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, D. J., & Luostarinen, R. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14 (2): 36–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 925–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hitt, M. A., & Cui, G. 2007. R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: Moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (6): 944–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Christian Asmussen, Peter Buckley, Ohad Ref, Robert Salomon and Lawrence Welch for their insights and comments. The paper has benefited greatly from the comments and suggestions made by JIBS Area Editor Ulf Andersson and three anonymous JIBS reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jerusalem School of Business Administration, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    Niron Hashai

Authors
  1. Niron Hashai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niron Hashai.

Additional information

Accepted by Ulf Andersson, Area Editor, 6 July 2011. This paper has been with the author for four revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashai, N. Sequencing the expansion of geographic scope and foreign operations by “born global” firms. J Int Bus Stud 42, 995–1015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.31

Keywords

Search

Navigation