, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 781-787

A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relative advantages of video versus internet-based decision aids to facilitate shared medical decision making. This study compared internet and video patient education modalities for men considering the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-six men, aged 50 years or older, and scheduled to complete a physical examination at an HMO Health Appraisal Clinic were randomly assigned to access a website (N=114) or view a 23-minute videotape in the clinic (N=112) prior to deciding whether they wanted to be screened for prostate cancer.

RESULTS: There were no between-groups differences in participants’ ratings of convenience, effort, or satisfaction following exposure to the decision aid. Participants assigned to the video group were more likely to review the materials than individuals assigned to the internet group (98.2% vs 53.5%). Participants in the video group showed significantly greater increases in PSA knowledge and were more likely to decline the PSA test than individuals assigned to the internet group. However, participants in the internet group who reviewed the entire online presentation showed similar increases in PSA knowledge as video participants. Only 5% of all participants visited other websites to inform themselves about the PSA test.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the video was significantly more effective than the Internet in educating participants about benefits and risks of PSA screening.

Presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, 4/3/02, Washington, DC.
Gratitude is expressed to Patrick Bogan, James Sallis, Vanessa Malcarne, Thomas Patterson, Theodore Ganiats, Albert Mulley, Michael Barry, Janet Ahlgren, Edi Feldman, Robb Thomas, and the staff of the Kaiser Permanente Health Appraisal Clinic. Supported by a grant from Friends Research Institute and by Cooperative Agreement UC57/CCU920678 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. None of the authors has any conflict of interest.