Looking forward to promotion
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
OBJECTIVES: To determine what clinician-educators consider important for promotion, and what support they find helpful and useful for success.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Eighty academic medical centers in the United States.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-three participants of the Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia comprising assistant professors in departments of medicine from 80 different medical schools in 35 states.
MEASUREMENTS: Differences between clinician-educators’ and clinician-investigators’ work activities, promotion preparedness, and faculty support needs.
RESULTS: One hundred seven (58%) of the faculty were clinician-educators (CEs), and 63 (34%) were clinician-investigators (CIs); the remaining 13 fit neither category. Participants had been in their faculty position for 4.7 years. Ninety-eight percent of CIs reported a publication expectation for promotion, and 75% of CEs also reported such an expectation. More CIs had career mentors available than CEs (68% vs 32%, P<.001). Seventy-nine percent of CIs indicated >10% protected scholarly work time, compared to only 35% of CEs (P<.001). Fifty-three percent of CIs as compared to 32% of CEs (P<.01) meet more often than yearly with their chief/chair for performance review, and more CIs have been written promotion guidelines (72% vs 51%, P<.01). Clinician educators believed out of 11 job performance areas, research, written scholarship, and reputation were the 3 most important factors that would determine the success of their application for promotion. Both CEs and CIs sense that CIs are more likely get promoted (82% vs 79%).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinician educators are less familiar with promotion guidelines, meet less often with superiors for performance review, and have less protected time than CI colleagues. There is dissonance between CEs’ beliefs and previously published data from promotion committee chairs in the importance given to specific aspects of job performance.
- Abrahamson, S (1996) Time to return medical schools to their primary purpose: education. Acad Med 71: pp. 343-7 CrossRef
- Stossel, TA (1991) Volume: papers and academic promotion. Ann Intern Med 106: pp. 146-8
- Levinson, W, Rubenstein, A (2000) Integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers: challenges and potential solutions. Acad Med 75: pp. 906-12 CrossRef
- McHugh, PR (1994) A letter of experience about faculty promotion in medical schools. Acad Med 69: pp. 877-81 CrossRef
- Beasley, BW, Wright, SM, Cofrancesco, J, Babbott, SF, Thomas, PA, Bass, EB (1997) Promotion criteria for clinical-educators in the United States and Canada. JAMA 278: pp. 723-8 CrossRef
- Atasoylu, AA, Wright, SM, Beasley, BW (2003) Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med 18: pp. 711-6 CrossRef
- Jones, RF, Gold, JS (1998) Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: a 1997 status report. Acad Med 73: pp. 211-9
- Levinson, W, Branch, WT, Kroenke, K (1998) Clinician-educators in academic medical centers: a 2-part challenge. Ann Intern Med 129: pp. 59-64
- Zakowski, LJ, Cooney, TG, Noel, GL (1998) Do general internal medicine fellows find jobs that match their training?. J Gen Intern Med 13: pp. 410-3 CrossRef
- Hafler, JP, Lovejoy, FH (2000) Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher-clinician faculty. Acad Med 75: pp. 649-52 CrossRef
- Sherertz, EF (2000) Criteria of the “Educators’ Pyramid” fulfilled by medical school faculty promoted on a teaching pathway. Acad Med 75: pp. 954-6 CrossRef
- Simpson, DE, Marcdante, KW, Duthie, EH, Sheehan, KM, Holloway, RL, Towne, JB (2000) Valuing educational scholarship at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Acad Med 75: pp. 930-4 CrossRef
- Nora, LM, Pomeroy, C, Curry, TE, Hill, NS, Tibbs, PA, Wilson, EA (2000) Revising appointment, promotion, and tenure procedures to incorporate an expanded definition of scholarship: the University of Kentucky College of Medicine Experience. Acad Med 75: pp. 913-24 CrossRef
- Fincher, RE, Simpson, DE, Mennin, SP (2000) Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st Century. Acad Med 75: pp. 887-94 CrossRef
- Simpson, D, Morzinski, J, Beecher, A (1994) Meeting the challenge to document teaching accomplishments: the educator’s portfolio. Teach Learn Med 6: pp. 203-6 CrossRef
- Looking forward to promotion
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 9 , pp 705-710
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- academic medical centers
- medical faculty
- cohort studies
- socioeconomic factors
- peer review
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Missouri in Kansas City-St. Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City, Mo
- 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md