Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
BACKGROUND: While international comparisons of medical practice have noted differences in length of visit, few studies have addressed the dynamics of visit exchange.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the communication of Dutch and U.S. hypertensive patients and their physicians in routine medical visits.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of visit audio/video tapes contrasting a Dutch sample of 102 visits with 27 general practitioners and a U.S. sample of 98 visits with 52 primary care physicians.
MEASUREMENTS: The Roter Interaction Analysis System applied to visit audiotapes. Total visit length and duration of the physical exam were measured directly.
MAIN RESULTS: U.S. visits were 6 minutes longer than comparable Dutch visits (15.4 vs 9.5 min, respectively), but the proportion of visits devoted to the physical examination was the same (24%). American doctors asked more questions and provided more information of both a biomedical and psychosocial nature, but were less patient-centered in their visit communication than were Dutch physicians. Cluster analysis revealed similar proportions of exam-centered (with especially long physical exam segments) and biopsychosocial visits in the 2 countries; however, 48% of the U.S. visits were biomedically intensive, while only 18% of the Dutch visits were of this type. Fifty percent of the Dutch visits were socioemotional, while this was true for only 10% of the U.S. visits.
CONCLUSIONS: U.S. and Dutch primary care visits showed substantial differences in communication patterns and visit length. These differences may reflect country distinctions in medical training and philosophy, health care system characteristics, and cultural values and expectations relevant to the delivery and receipt of medical services.
- Wilson A. Consultation length in general practice: a review. Br J Gen Pract. 1991;41:119–22.
- Wilson A, McDonald P, Hayes L, Cooney J. Health promotion in the general practice consultation: a minute makes a difference. BMJ. 1992;304:227–34.
- van den Brink-Muinen A, Verhaak PFM, Bensing JM, et al. The Eurocommunication Study. Utrecht: NIVEL; 1999.
- Blumenthal D, Causino N, Chang YC, et al. The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:264–71.
- Wiggers JH, Sanson-Fisher R. Duration of general practice consultations: association with patient occupational and educational status. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:925–34. CrossRef
- Roland MO, Bartholomew J, Courtenay MJ, Morris RW, Morrell DC. The “five minute” consultation: effect of time constraint on verbal communication. Br Med J Clin Res Ed. 1986;292:874–6.
- Grieve S. Time availability in the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:167–8.
- Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M. Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 1997;i–xii:1–32.
- Wilson AD. Consultation length: general practitioners’ attitudes and practices. BMJ. 1985;290:1322–4.
- Howie JGR, Porter AMD, Forbes JF. Quality and the use of time in general practice: widening the discussion. BMJ. 1989;298:1008–10.
- Bensing JM. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. An observation study into affective and instrumental behavior in general practice. Dissertation. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Utrecht: NIVEL; 1991.
- Robinson JW, Roter DL. Counseling by primary care physicians of patients who disclose psychosocial problems. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:698–705.
- Anderson SO, Mattsson B. Length of consultations in general practice in Sweden: views of doctors and patients. Fam Pract. 1989;6:130–4. CrossRef
- Rashid A, Forman W, Jagger C, Mann R. Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients’ and doctors’ satisfaction. BMJ. 1989;299:1015–6.
- Howie JGR, Porter AMD, Heaney DJ, Hopton JL. Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1991;41:48–54.
- Hull FM, Hull FS. Time and the general practitioner: the patient’s view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984;34:71–5.
- Morrell DC, Evans ME, Morris RW. The “five-minute” consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. BMJ. 1986;292:870–2.
- Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers W, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.
- Ridsdale L, Carruthers M, Morris R, Ridsdale J. Study of the effect of time availability on the consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989;39:488–91.
- Knight R. The importance of list size and consultation length as factors in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987;37:553–9.
- Carr-Hill R, Jenkins-Clarke S, Dixon P, Pringle M. Do minutes count? Consultation lengths in general practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998;3:207–13.
- Anderson SO, Mattsson B. Features of good consultation in general practice: is time important? Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994;12:227–32.
- Mead N, Bower P. Measuring patient-centeredness: a comparison of three observation-based instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:71–80. CrossRef
- Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors Talking to Patients/Patients Talking to Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Westport, Conn: Auburn House; 1992.
- Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33.
- Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
- Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient centered approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2001;322:468–72. CrossRef
- Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Stiles W, Inui TS. The patient-physician relationship. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350–6. CrossRef
- Mishler EG. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1984.
- Roter DL. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:5–15. CrossRef
- Engel GL. How much longer must medicine’s science be bound by a seventeenth century world view? In: White K, ed. The Task of Medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg. Menlo Park, Calif: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 1988.
- McWhinney I. The need for a transformed clinical method. In: Stewart M, Roter D, eds. Communicating with Medical Patients. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1989.
- Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA. 1997;277:678–82. CrossRef
- Starfield B. Health systems’ effects on health status-financing vs the organization of services. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1350–1. CrossRef
- Verhaak PFM. Detection of psychologic complaints by general practitioners. Med Care. 1988;26:1009–20. CrossRef
- Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker R, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84. CrossRef
- Roter D, Larson S. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243–51. CrossRef
- Bensing JM, Dronkers J. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care. 1992;30:283–97. CrossRef
- Ong LML, Visser MRM, Kruijver IPM, et al. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties. Psychooncology. 1998;7:387–401. CrossRef
- Roter D, Hall J, Katz N. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions: an analogue study. Med Care. 1987;25:399–412. CrossRef
- Hall J, Roter D, Katz N. Task versus socioemotional behaviors in physicians. Med Care. 1987;25:437–51. CrossRef
- Forrest CB, Whelan E. Primary care safety net delivery sites in the United States. JAMA. 2000;284:2077–83. CrossRef
- Grol R. To Heal or to Harm. The Prevention of Somatic Fixation in General Practice. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1981.
- LHV (Dutch National Organization of General Practitioners). Basic Job Description for the General Practitioner. Utrecht: LHV; 1994.
- Mokkink HGA, Schellekens CMAM, Tielens VCL. Consultduur in de huisartspraktijk. Een studie naar de consultduur in relatie tot patiënt- en klachtkenmerken, en de kwaliteit van het handelen van de huisarts. [Consultation length in general practice, related to patient and complaint characteristics and quality of care]. Huisarts en Wet. 1993;36:285–90.
- Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;344:198–204. CrossRef
- van den Brink-Muinen A, Verhaak PFM, Bensing JM. The EUROCommunication Study. An International Comparative study in Six European Countries on Doctor-Patient Communication in General Practice. Utrecht: NIVEL; 1999.
- Hulsman RL, Ros WJG, Winnubst JAM, Bensing JM. Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills. A review of evaluation studies. Med Educ. 1999;33:655–68. CrossRef
- Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 5 , pp 335-342
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- primary care
- health care system
- visit length
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. NIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 2. School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md
- 3. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands