Indicators of early research productivity among primary care fellows
Cite this article as: Steiner, J.F., Lanphear, B.P., Curtis, P. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2002) 17: 854. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10515.x Abstract OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the impact of fellowship training in primary care on subsequent research productivity. Our goal was to identify characteristics of research fellows and their training associated with subsequent publications and research funding. DESIGN: Mail survey in 1998. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 1988–1997 graduates of 25 National Research Service Award primary care research fellowships in the United States. OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Publishing 1 or more papers per year since the beginning of fellowship, or 2) serving as principal investigator (PI) on a federal or non-federal grant. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six of two hundred fifteen program graduates (68%) completed the survey. The median age was 38 years, and 51% were male. Thirty-two percent had published 1 or more papers per year, and 44% were PIs. Male gender (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4 to 9.2), self-reported allocation of 40% or more of fellowship time to research (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8 to 11.2), and having an influential mentor during fellowship (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 17.2) were independently associated with publishing 1 or more papers per year. Fellows with funding as a PI were also more likely to have an influential mentor (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.2). CONCLUSION: Primary care fellows who had influential mentors were more productive in research early after fellowship. Awareness of the indicators of early research success can inform the policies of agencies that fund research training and the curricula of training programs themselves. Key words fellowship academic medicine primary care mentorship
Support for this research was provided by the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Contract #97-0452(P)-BHPR.
National Research Council Committee on National Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists. Addressing the Nation’s Changing Needs For Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
Cadman EC. The academic physician-investigator: a crisis not to be ignored. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:401–10.
Schrier RW. Ensuring the survival of the clinician-scientist. Acad Med. 1997;72:589–94.
Nathan DG. Clinical research: perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. JAMA. 1998;280:1427–31.
Pardes H. The perilous state of academic medicine. JAMA. 2000;283:2427–9.
Zemlo TR, Garrison HH, Partridge NC, Ley TJ. The physician-scientist: career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J. 2000;14:221–30.
Fogelman AM. Strategies for training generalists and subspecialists. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:579–83.
Levey GS, Sherman CR, Gentile NO, Hough LJ, Dial TH, Jolly P. Postdoctoral research training of full-time faculty in academic departments of medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:414–8.
Lee TH, Ognibene FP, Schwartz JS. Correlates of external research support among respondents to the 1990 American Federation for Clinical Research survey. Clin Res. 1991;39:135–44.
Bordage G, Burack JH, Irby DM, Stritter FT. Education in ambulatory settings: developing valid measures of educational outcomes, and other research priorities. Acad Med. 1998;73:743–50.
Hutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ. 1999;318:1267–9.
Steiner JF, Curtis P, Lanphear BP, Vu KO, Reid A. Federally-funded fellowship training in primary care research: perspectives of program directors. Acad Med. 2000;75:74–80.
Curtis P, Reid A, Newton W. The primary care research fellowship: an early assessment. Fam Med. 1992;24:586–90.
Zakowski LJ, Cooney TG, Noel GL. Do general internal medicine fellows find jobs that match their training? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:410–3.
Haggerty RJ. The academic generalist: an endangered species revived. Pediatrics. 1990;86:413–20.
Rodgers CH, Scherbenske MJ. An evaluation of postdoctoral research training and trainees supported by the National Institutes of Health in the Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;16:147–53.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.
Shuster AL, Cluff LE, Haynes MA, Hook EW, Rogers DE. An innovation in physician training: the Clinical Scholars Program. J Med Educ. 1983;58:101–11.
Lee TH, Goldman L. Models of postdoctoral research training. J Investig Med. 1995;43:250–61.
Curtis P, Shaffer VD, Goldstein AO, Seufert L. Counting the cost of an NRSA primary care research fellowship program. Fam Med. 1998;30:12–23.
Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA. 1995;273:1022–5.
Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement: results of a national survey of pediatricians. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1282–9.
Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:532–8.
Steiner JF, Lanphear BP, Curtis P, Vu KO. The training and career paths of fellows in the National Research Service Award (NRSA) program for research in primary care. Acad Med. 2002;77:712–8.
Schapira MM, Kalet A, Schwartz MD, Gerrity MS. Mentorship in general internal medicine: investment in our future. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:248–51.
Rogers JC, Holloway RL, Miller SM. Academic mentoring and family medicine’s research productivity. Fam Med. 1990;22:186–90.
Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318–23.
Williams R, Blackburn RT. Mentoring and junior faculty productivity. J Nurs Educ. 1988;27:204–9.
Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154:423–6.
Reid A, Stritter FT, Arndt JE. Assessment of faculty development program outcomes. Fam Med. 1997;29:242–7.
PubMed Copyright information
© Society of General Internal Medicine 2002