Evidence on interventions to reduce medical errors
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
OBJECTIVE: To critically review the existing evidence on interventions aimed at reducing errors in health care delivery.
DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized trials on behavioral, educational, informational, and management interventions relating to medical errors. Pertinent studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry, and communications with experts.
SETTING: Both inpatients and outpatients qualified. No age or disease restrictions were set.
MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were medical errors, including medication, prescription, and diagnostic errors, and excluding preventive medicine errors and simple ordering of redundant tests.
MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen randomized studies qualified for evaluation. The trials varied extensively in their patient populations (mean age, 2 weeks to 83 years), study setting, definition of errors, and interventions. Most studies could not afford masking and rigorous allocation concealment. In 9 of 13 studies, error rates in the control arms were very high (10% to 63%), and large treatment benefits from the studied interventions were demonstrated for the main outcome. Interventions were almost always effective in a sample of 24 nonrandomized studies evaluated for comparison. Actual patient harm from serious errors was rarely recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical errors were very frequent in the studies we identified, arising sometimes in more than half of the cases where there is an opportunity for error. Relatively simple interventions may achieve large reductions in error rates. Evidence on reduction of medical errors needs to be better categorized, replicated, and tested in study designs maximizing protection from bias. Emphasis should be placed on serious errors.
- Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6. CrossRef
- Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34. CrossRef
- Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:294–300. CrossRef
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
- Leape LL, Berwick DM. Safe health care: are we up to it? BMJ. 2000;320:725–6. CrossRef
- Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibbert RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ. 2000;320:774–7. CrossRef
- Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ. 2000;320:788–91. CrossRef
- Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:135–42.
- Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled clinical trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–12. CrossRef
- Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1728–33. CrossRef
- Owens NJ, Sherburne NJ, Silliman RA, Fretwell MD. The Senior Care Study. The optimal use of medications in acutely ill older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:1082–7.
- Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou X-H, McDonald CJ. A randomized trial of “corollary orders” to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:364–74.
- Ley P, Jain VK, Skilbeck CE. A method for decreasing patients’ medication errors. Psychol Med. 1976;6:599–601. CrossRef
- Barker KN, Pearson RE, Hepler CD, Smith WE, Pappas CA. Effect of an automated bedside dispensing machine on medication errors. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984;41:1352–8.
- McMahon SR, Rimsza ME, Bay RC. Parents can dose liquid medication accurately. Pediatrics. 1997;100:330–3. CrossRef
- Klassen TP, Ropp LJ, Sutcliffe T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of radiograph ordering for extremity trauma in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1524–9. CrossRef
- Attard AR, Corlett MJ, Kidner NJ, Leslie AP, Fraser IA. Safety of early pain relief for acute abdominal pain. BMJ. 1992;305:554–6.
- McCarthy PL, Sznajderman SD, Lustman-Finding K, et al. Mothers’ clinical judgment: a randomized trial of the Acute Illness Observation Scales. J Pediatr. 1990;116:200–6. CrossRef
- Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6. CrossRef
- Pereles L, Romonko L, Murzyn T, et al. Evaluation of a self-medication program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:161–5.
- Buchanan TL, Barker KN, Gibson T, Jiang BC, Pearson RE. Illumination and errors in dispensing. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:2137–45.
- Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999;282:267–70. CrossRef
- Sakr M, Angus J, Perrin J, Nixon C, Nicholl J, Wardrope J. Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;354: 1321–6. CrossRef
- Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:313–21.
- Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:232–8. CrossRef
- Hill PA, Wigmore HM. Measurement and control of drug-administration incidents. Lancet. 1967;1:671–4. CrossRef
- Schnell BR. A study of unit-dose drug distribution in four Canadian hospitals. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1976;29:85–90.
- Barker KN. The effects of an experimental medication system on medication errors and costs. Part I. Introduction and errors study. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1969;26:324–33.
- Borel JM, Rascati KL. Effect of an automated, nursing unit-based drug-dispensing device on medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52:1875–9.
- Milliken DL, Gervais AA. The impact of computerization on medication discrepancies in a centralized unit dose drug utilization system. Hosp Pharm. 1990;25:650–2.
- Wilson AL, Hill JJ, Wilson RG, Nipper K, Kwon IW. Computerized medication administration records decrease medication occurrences. Pharm Pract Manag Q. 1997;17:17–29.
- Hayman JN. Microcomputer-assisted monitoring of medication-dispensing errors. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989;46:1806–9.
- Raehtz KG, Walker PC. Computer-assisted TPN calculations: time savings and improved accuracy associated with use of a microcomputer. Hosp Pharm. 1988;23:800–4.
- Barker KN, Harris JA, Webster DB, et al. Consultant evaluation of a hospital medication system: implementation and evaluation of the new system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984;41:2022–9.
- Morris WT, Lamb AM. Clinical trials are usually beneficial to patients and hospitals. N Z Med J. 1989;102:472–4.
- Ray MD, Aldrich LT, Lew PJ. Experience with an automated pointof-use unit-dose drug distribution system. Hosp Pharm. 1995;30:18, 20–3, 27–30.
- Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Horn SD, Bass SB, Burke JP. Preventing adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Ann Pharmacother. 1994;28:523–7.
- MacDonald ET, MacDonald JB, Phoenix M. Improving drug compliance after hospital discharge. Br Med J. 1977;2:618–21.
- Simborg DW, Derewicz HJ, A highly automated hospital medication system. Five years’ experience and evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:342–6.
- Hynniman CE, Conrad WF, Urch WA, Rudnick BR, Parker PF. A comparison of medication errors under the University of Kentucky unit dose system and traditional drug distribution systems in four hospitals. Am J Hospital Pharm. 1970;27:802–14.
- Means BJ, Derewicz HJ, Lamy PP. Medication errors in a multidose and a computer-based unit dose drug distribution system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1975;32:186–91.
- Koepsell TD, Gurtel AL, Diehr PH, et al. The Seattle evaluation of computerized drug profiles: effects on prescribing practices and resource use. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:850–5. CrossRef
- Klein EG, Santora JA, Pascale PM, Kiternos JG. Medication cartfilling time, accuracy, and cost with an automated dispensing system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994;51:1193–6.
- Gard JW, Starnes HM, Morrow EL, Sanchez PJ, Perlman JM. Reducing antimicrobial dosing errors in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52:1508–13.
- Crooks J, Weir RD, Coull DC, et al. Evaluation of a method of prescribing drugs in hospital and a new method of recording their administration. Lancet. 1967;1:668–71. CrossRef
- Stampfer M. Observational epidemiology is the preferred means of evaluating effects of behavioral and lifestyle modification. Control Clin Trials. 1997;18:494–9. CrossRef
- Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomized and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 1998;317:1185–90.
- Raschke RA, Gollihare B, Wunderlich TA, et al. A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. JAMA. 1998;280:1317–20. CrossRef
- Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA. 1998;279:281–6. CrossRef
- Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1529–41.
- Bates DW, Boyle DL, Vander Vliet M, Schneider J, Leape L. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:199–205. CrossRef
- Evidence on interventions to reduce medical errors
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 5 , pp 325-334
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- medical errors
- behavioral interventions
- randomized trials
- study design
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. From the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
- 2. Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
- 3. Division of Clinical Care Research, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Box 63, 02111, Boston, MA