Prevalence and determinants of intimate partner abuse among public hospital primary care patients Authors
Populations At Risk
Cite this article as: Bauer, H.M., Rodríguez, M.A. & Pérez-Stable, E.J. J GEN INTERN MED (2000) 15: 811. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91217.x Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, sociodemographic determinants, and depression correlates of intimate partner abuse among an ethnically diverse population of women patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey in English and Spanish of a random sample of women patients aged 18 to 46 years. SETTING: Three public hospital primary care clinics (general internal medicine, family medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology) in San Francisco, Calif. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 734 (74%) of the 992 eligible participants. Thirty-one percent were non-Latina white, 31% African American, and 36% Latina. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using questions adapted from the Abuse Assessment Screen, we determined recent and lifetime history of physical, sexual, and psychological abuse. Overall, 15% reported recent abuse by an intimate partner (in the preceding 12 months); lifetime prevalence was 51%. Recent abuse was more common among women aged 18 to 29 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.7), non-Latinas (adjusted OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.9), and unmarried women (adjusted OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7). The prevalence of abuse did not differ by education, employment, or medical insurance status of the women. Compared with women with no history of abuse, a greater proportion of recently abused women reported symptoms of depression (adjusted OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.2 to 5.5). CONCLUSIONS: Because a substantial proportion of women patients in primary care settings are abused, screening for partner abuse and depression is indicated. In contrast to other studies, lower socioeconomic status was not associated with partner abuse history. Key words domestic violence spouse abuse prevalence risk factors socioeconomic status ethnicity depression
Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, November 17, 1998.
This research was supported by the Picker Commonwealth Foundation and by a grant from the Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, funded by the National Institute on Aging.
Straus M, Gelles R. Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J Marriage Fam. 1986;48:465–79.
Plichta SB. Violence and abuse: implications for women’s health. In: Falik MM, Collins KS, eds. Women’s Health: The Commonwealth Fund Survey. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996:237–70.
Hampton RL, Gelles RJ, Harrop JW. Is violence in black families increasing? A comparison of 1975 and 1985 national survey rates. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51:969–80.
Sorenson SB, Upchurch DM, Shen H. Violence and injury in marital arguments: risk patterns and gender differences. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:35–40.
U.S. Department of Justice. Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends, and Girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 1998:1–46. Pub no. NCJ-167237.
Straus MA, Smith C. Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: incidence rates and structural interpretations. In: Straus MA, Gelles RJ, eds. Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ; Transaction Publishers; 1990:341–71.
Kantor GK, Jasinski JL, Aldarondo E. Sociocultural status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families. Violence Victims. 1994;9:207–22.
Neff JA, Holamon B, Schluter TD. Spousal violence among Anglos, Blacks, and Mexican Americans: the role of demographic variables, psychosocial predictors, and alcohol consumption. J Fam Violence. 1995;20:1–21.
Lockhart LL. A reexamination of the effects of race and social class on the incidence of marital violence: a search for reliable differences. J Marriage Fam. 1987;49:603–10.
Sorenson SB, Telles CA. Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White population. Violence Victims. 1991;6:3–15.
Buehler J, Dixon B, Toomey K. Lifetime and annual incidence of intimate partner violence and resulting injuries—Georgia, 1995. Morb Mort Week Rep. 1998;47:849–53.
Rath GL, Jarratt LG, Leonardson G. Rates of domestic violence against adult women by men partners. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989;2:227–33.
Gin NE, Rucker L, Frayne S, Cygan R, Hubbel FA. Prevalence of domestic violence among patients in three ambulatory care internal medicine clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:317–22.
McCauley J, Kern DE, Kolodner K, et al. The “battering syndrome”: prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:737–46.
Wagner PJ, Mongan P, Hamrick D, Hendrick LK. Experience of abuse in primary care patients: racial and rural differences. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:956–62.
Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatr Clin No Am. 1997;20:353–74.
Resnick HS, Acierno R, Kilpatrick DG. Health impact of interpersonal violence 2: medical and mental health outcomes. Behav Med. 1997;23:65–78.
Scholle SH, Rost KM, Golding JM. Physical abuse among depressed women. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:607–13.
Stark E, Flitcraft A. Killing the beast within: woman battering and female suicidality. Int J Health Serv. 1995;25:43–64.
McCauley J, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Derogatis LR, Bass EB. Relation of low-severity violence to women’s health. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:687–91.
Stark E, Flitcraft AH. Woman battering. In: Wallace RB, ed. Maxcy-Rosenau-Last Public Health and Preventive Medicine. 14th ed. Stanford, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1998:1231–8.
Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression: two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:439–45.
Marin G, Sabogal F, Marin BV, Otero-Sabogal R, Perez-Stable EJ. Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987;9:183–205.
McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA. 1992;267:3176–8.
Soeken K, Parker B, McFarlane J, Lominak MC. The Abuse Assessment Screen: a clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity and perpetrator of abuse against women. In: Campbell J, ed. Empowering Survivors of Abuse: Health Care for Battered Women and Their Children. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cultural Psych. 1970;1:185–216.
Bureau of the Census, Economics and Statistics Administration. Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990 Census Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 1991.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Alexandria, Va: International Medical Publications Incorporated; 1996:555–65.
© Society of General Internal Medicine 2000