, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 395-401

Delays in protease inhibitor use in clinical practice

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical factors associated with delayed protease inhibitor initiation.

DESIGN: Chart review and telephone survey.

SETTING: General medicine practice at an academic medical center in Boston, Mass.

PATIENTS: One hundred ninety patients living with HIV and a viral load of more than 10,000 copies/ml.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measurement was time to first protease inhibitor prescription after first elevated HIV viral load (>10,000 copies/ml). In this cohort, 190 patients had an elevated viral load (median age 39; 87% male; 12% history of injection drug use; 63% AIDS; 53% with depression; 17% history of pneumocystis pneumonia; 54% CD4 <200). In Cox proportional hazards modeling, significant univariate correlates for delayed protease inhibitor initiation were higher CD4 cell count (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38 for CD4 200–500 compared with <200, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59, 3.57; and HR 8.33 for CD4 >500; 95% CI 2.63, 25.0), higher viral load (HR 0.43 for each 10-fold increase; 95% CI 0.31, 0.59), injection drug use (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.05, 4.17), AIDS (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.15, 0.36), and history of pneumocystis pneumonia (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.21, 0.49). In multivariate models adjusted for secular trends in protease inhibitor use, factors significantly associated with delay of protease inhibitor initiation (p<.05) were higher CD4 cell count (for CD4 200–500, HR 2.63; 95% CI 1.61, 4.17; for CD4 >500, HR 11.11; 95% CI 3.57, 33.33), higher viral load (HR 0.66 for each 10-fold increase; 95% CI 0.45, 0.98), history of pneumocystis pneumonia (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37, 0.90), history of depression (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.03, 2.13), and history of injection drug use (HR 2.70; 95% CI 1.35, 5.56).

CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected patients with higher CD4 cell counts or a history of depression or history of injection drug use have significant and lengthy delays of protease inhibitor therapy. Although some delays may be clinically appropriate, enhancement of provider and patient education might prove beneficial. Further research should examine reasons for delays in protease inhibitor initiation and their appropriateness.

Presented in part at the Society of General Internal Medicine 21st annual meeting, April 25, 1998.
Dr. Fairfield was supported by National Research Service Award PE11001-09. Partial funding for this project was provided by the Center for Alternative Medicine Research (National Institutes of Health Grant U24 AR3441), The John E. Fetzer Institute, the Friends of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, the Kenneth J. Germeshausen Foundation, and the J.E. and Z.B. Butler Foundation.