Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
OBJECTIVE: To examine the language of “turfing,” a ubiquitous term applied to some transfers of patients between physicians, in order to reveal aspects of the ideology of internal medicine residency.
SETTING: Academic internal medicine training program.
MEASUREMENTS: Using direct observation and a focus group, we collected audiotapes of medical residents’ discussions of turfing. These data were analyzed using interpretive and conversation analytic methods. The focus group was used both to validate and to further elaborate a schematic conceptual framework for turfing.
MAIN RESULTS: The decision to call a patient “turfed” depends on the balance of the values of effectiveness of therapy, continuity of care, and power. For example, if the receiving physician cannot provide a more effective therapy than can the transferring physician, medical residents consider the transfer inappropriate, and call the patient a turf. With appropriate transfers, these residents see their service as honorable, but with turfs, residents talk about the irresponsibility of transferring physicians, burdens of service, abuse, and powerlessness.
CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents can feel angry and frustrated about receiving patients perceived to be rejected by other doctors, and powerless to prevent the transfer of those patients for whom they may have no effective treatment or continuous relationship. This study has implications for further exploration of how the relationships between physicians may uphold or conflict with the underlying moral tenets of the medical profession.
- Stern DT. Hanging Out: Teaching Values in Medical Education. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University; 1996. Dissertation.
- Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. Turf; electronic search.
- Anspach RA. Notes on the sociology of medical discourse. J Health Soc Behav. 1988;29:357–75. CrossRef
- Stern DT. Values on call: a method for assessing the teaching of professionalism. Acad Med. 1996;71(10 suppl 1):S37–9. CrossRef
- Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1990.
- DuBois JW, Schuetze-Coburn S, Paolino D, Cumming S. Santa Barbara Linguistics, Vol. 4, Discourse Transcription. Santa Barbara, Calif: Department of Linguistics, University of California; 1992.
- Ochs E, Capps L. Narrating the Self. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1996;26:18–43.
- West C, Zimmerman DH. Conversation analysis. In: Scherer KR, Ekman P, eds. Handbook of Methods of Nonverbal Behavior Research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1982:506–41.
- Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
- Anspach R. Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1993.
- Hardison JE. Benefit of the doubt. Am J Med. 1985;79:401–2. CrossRef
- Cassell EJ. Talking with Patients, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press; 1985.
- Gal S. Language and the “arts of resistance”. Cultural Anthropology. 1995;10(3):407–24. CrossRef
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 4 , pp 243-248
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- patient transfers
- professional relationships
- professional values
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Hospital, USA
- 2. The Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich