Work activities of clinician-educators Authors
Cite this article as: Sheffield, J.V.L., Wipf, J.E. & Buchwald, D. J GEN INTERN MED (1998) 13: 406. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00120.x Abstract
In order to make meaningful scholarly contributions, clinicianeducators need protected time. Forty-one clinician-educators at the University of Washington recorded their work activities in 30-minute intervals for 2 weeks. The average work week was 58.7 hours (SD=13.8). The time devoted to scholarship, 7.6 hours (13%), was significantly less than the 20% designated for scholarship in the clinician-educator job description (
p<.001); 42% of scholarly work occurred outside the regular work week. At a time when many schools rely on clinician-educators to sustain their clinical and teaching missions, schools should ensure that faculty have adequate time and resources to meet scholarly expectations for promotion. Key words faculty clinician-educator productivity work activities
Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine’s 18th annual meeting, Washington, D.C., May 3, 1996.
Download to read the full article text References
Parris M, Stemmler EJ. Development of clinician-educator faculty track at the University of Pennsylvania. J Med Educ. 1984;59:465–70.
Kelley WN, Stross JK. Faculty tracks and academic success. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:654–9.
Greer DS. Faculty rewards for the generalist clinician-teacher. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(suppl):S53–8.
Jones RF. Clinician-educator faculty tracks in US medical schools. J Med Educ. 1987;62:444–7.
Bickel J. The changing face of promotion and tenure at US medical schools. Acad Med. 1991;66:249–56.
Beasley BW, Wright SM, Confrancesco J, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada: a survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997;278:723–8.
Jacobs MB. Faculty status for clinician-educators: guidelines for evaluation and promotion. Acad Med. 1993;68:126–8.
Lubitz RM. Guidelines for promotion of clinican-educators. Society of General Internal Medicine Education Committee. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):S71–7.
Jones RF, Froom JD. Faculty and administration views of problems in faculty evaluation. Acad Med. 1994;69:476–83.
Vardan S, Smulyan H, Mookherjee S, Mehrotra KG. Factors encouraging research productivity in a division of general internal medicine. Acad Med. 1990;65:772–4.
Kroenke K. Conducting research as a busy clinician-teacher or trainee: starting blocks, hurdles, and finish lines. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:360–5.
Friedman RH, Pozen JT, Rosencrans AL, Eisenberg JM, Gertman PM. General internal medicine units in academic medical centers: their emergence and functions. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:233–8.
Zakowski LJ, Cooney TG, Noel GL. Academic general internists: job descriptions for clinician/researchers and clinician/educators. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(suppl):112. Abstract.
Zakowski LJ, Cooney TG, Noel GL. Do graduates of general internal medicine fellowships get the jobs they want? J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(suppl):112. Abstract.
Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Blumenthal D. Relationship between market competition and the activities and attitudes of medical school faculty. JAMA. 1997;278:222–6.
Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
© Society of General Internal Medicine 1998