Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Procedural experience and comfort level in internal medicine trainees

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has recommended a specific number of procedures be done as a minimum standard for ensuring competence in various medical procedures. These minimum standards were determined by consensus of an expert panel and may not reflect actual procedural comfort or competence.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the minimum number of selected procedures at which a majority of internal medicine trainees become comfortable performing that procedure.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey.

SETTING: A military-based, a community-based, and 2 university-based programs.

PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-two internal medicine residents.

MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions included number of specific procedures performed, comfort level with performing specific procedures, and whether respondents desired further training in specific procedures. The comfort threshold for a given procedure was defined as the number of procedures at which two thirds or more of the respondents reported being comfortable or very comfortable performing that procedure.

RESULTS: For three of seven procedures selected, residents were comfortable performing the procedure at or below the number recommended by the ABIM as a minimum requirement. However, residents needed more procedures than recommended by the ABIM to feel comfortable with central venous line placement, knee joint aspiration, lumbar puncture, and thoracentesis. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with greater comfort performing selected procedures included increased number performed, more years of training, male gender, career goals, and for skin biopsy, training in the community-based program. Except for skin biopsy, comfort level was independent of training site. A significant number of advanced-year house officers in some programs had little experience in performing selected common ambulatory procedures.

CONCLUSION: Minimum standards for certifying internal medicine residents may need to be reexamined in light of house officer comfort level performing selected procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wigton RS, Nicolas JA, Blank LL. Procedural skills of the general internist. A survey of 2500 physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:1023–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wigton RS. A method for selecting which procedural skills should be learned by internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 1981;56:512–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greganti MA, McGaghie WC, Mattern WD. Toward consensus: training in procedural skills for internal medicine residents. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1177–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wigton RS, Steinmann WC. Procedural skills training in the internal medicine residency. J Med Educ. 1984;59:392–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wigton RS, Blank LL, Nicolas BA, Tape TG. Procedural skills training in internal medicine residencies: A survey of program directors. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:932–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandel JH, Rich EC, Luxenberg MG, Spilane MT, Kern DC, Parrino TA. Preparation for practice in internal medicine. A study of ten years of residency graduates. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:853–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern DC, Parrino TA, Korst DR. The lasting value of clinical skills. JAMA. 1985;254:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Powers LR, Draeger SK. Using workshops to teach residents primary care procedures. Acad Med. 1992;67:743–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruce NC. Evaluation of procedural skills of internal medicine residents. Acad Med. 1989;64:213–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American Board of Internal Medicine. Guide to Evaluation of Residents in Internal Medicine, 1991–1992. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Board of Internal Medicine. Policies and Procedures for Certification, July 1998. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schertz RD, Baskin WN, Frakes JT. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy training for primary care physicians: results of a 5-year experience. Gastrointestinal Endo. 1989;35:316–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawes R, Lehman GA, Hast J, Ô’Connor KW, Crabb DW, Lui A, et al. Training resident physicians in fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. How many supervised examinations are required to achieve competence? Am J Med. 1986;80:465–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wigton RS. Measuring procedural skills. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:1003–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gross EB. Gender differences in physician stress. J Am Med Women’s Assoc. 1992;47:107–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shapiro J, McGrath E, Anderson RC. Patients’, medical students’, and physicians’ perceptions of male and female physicians. Percept Motor Skills. 1983;56:179–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Anderson MD.

Additional information

Dr. Ralph Gonzales is supported in part by a Robert Wood Johnson Minority Medical Faculty Development grant (#2532434).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicks, C.M., Gonzales, R., Morton, M.T. et al. Procedural experience and comfort level in internal medicine trainees. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 716–722 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91104.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91104.x

Key Words

Navigation