Abstract
The aim of this paper is to elucidate the question of whether Newtonian mechanics can be derived from relativity theory. Physicists agree that classical mechanics constitutes a limiting case of relativity theory. By contrast, philosophers of science like Kuhn and Feyerabend affirm that classical mechanics cannot be deduced from relativity theory because of the incommensurability between both theories; thus what we obtain when we take the limit c→∞ in relativistic mechanics cannot be Newtonian mechanics sensu stricto. In this paper I focus on the alleged change of reference of the term mass in the transition from one theory to the other. Contradicting Kuhn and Feyerabend, special relativity theory supports the view that the mass of an object is a characteristic property of the object, that it has the same value in whatever frame of reference it is measured, and that it does not depend on whether the object is in motion or at rest. Thus mass preserves the reference through the change of theory, and the existence of a Newtonian limit of relativity theory provides a good example of the rationality of theory change in mathematical physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adler, C.: 1987, 'Does Mass Really Depend on Velocity, Dad?', Am. J. Phys. 55(8), 739–743
Born, M.: 1962, Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Dover, New York. First German edition, 1920.
Dalla Chiara, M. L. and G. Toraldo di Francia: 1999, Introduzione alla filosofia della scienza, Roma-Bari, Laterza & Figli Spa. Spanish edition Confines: Introducción a la filosofaa de la ciencia, Crítica, Barcelona, 2001.
Earman, J. and A. Fine: 1977, 'Against Indeterminacy', The Journal of Philosophy 74(9), 535–539.
Eddington, A. S.: 1923, The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge University Press.
Einstein, A.:1917,Über die spezielle und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, (Reprinted in A.J. Fox, M. J. Klein and R. Schulmann (eds.),The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein,Vol.6, The Berlin Years, 1914-1917, Princeton University Press, 1996.)
Feyerabend, P. K.:1978,'Kuhns "Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen". Ein Trost-büchlein für Spezialisten?', in P. K. Feyerabend(ed.),Der wissenschaftliche Realismus und die Autorität der Wissenschaften, Ausgewählte Schriften, Band 1. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1981a, 'Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism', in P. K. Feye-rabend (ed.), Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method, Philosophical Papers,Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1981b, 'Consolations for the Specialist', in P. K. Feyerabend (ed.), Problems of Empiricism, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
Field, H.: 1973, 'Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference', The Journal of Philosophy LXX(14), 462–481.
Goldstein, H.: 1950, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Second edition 1980.
Goldstein, H., C. Poole and J. Safko: 2002, Classical Mechanics, Addison Wesley, San Francisco. Third edition.
Jammer, M.: 1961, Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Jammer, M.: 2000, Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Kant, I.: 1936, Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. von der Preussischen Akademie der Wis-senschaften. Band XXI. Dritte Abtheilung: Handschriftlicher Nachlass, Achter Band, Opus Postumum, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin und Leipzig.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second enlarged edition, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1977, 'Theory-Change as Structure-Change', in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1990, 'The Road Since Structure', in A. Fine, et al. (eds.), PSA 1990, 2, 3–13.
Landau, L. and E. Lifshitz: 1951, The Classical Theory of Fields, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Misner, CH. W., K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler: 1973, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Newton, I.: 1704, Optics, Encyclopaedia Britannica, INC, Chicago 1952, 4th printing 1993.
Okun, L. B.: 1989, 'The Concept of Mass', Physics Today, pp. 31–36
Okun, L. B.: 1990, 'Replies', in Putting to Rest Mass Misconceptions, Physics Today, Letters, pp. 114–117
Popper, K.: 1935, Logik der Forschung, Springer, Wien. (The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London 1959).
Popper, K.: 1979, Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie,J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen. Edited by Troels Eggers Hansen on the basis of manuscripts from the years 1930-1933.
Popper, K.: 1994, 'The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions', in K. Popper, The Myth of the Framework, Routledge, London. Appeared in R. Harré (ed.), Problems of Scientific Revolution, 1975.
Sandin, T. R.: 1991, 'In Defense of Relativistic Mass', Am. J. Phys. 59(11), 1032–1036.
Sneed, J.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Sneed, J.: 1977, 'Describing Revolutionary Scientific Change: A Formal Approach', in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Stegmüller, W.: 1980, Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Taylor, E. and J. A. Wheeler: 1992, Spacetime Physics. Introduction to Special Relativity, 2nd edn, Freeman and Co., New York.
Torretti, R.: 1999, The Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge University Press.
Weinberg, S.: 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Weinberg, S.: 1989, 'Newtonianism and Today's Physics', in S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (eds.), 300 Years of Gravitation, Cambridge University Press.
Weinberg, S.: 1998, 'The Revolution That Didn't Happen', The New York Review of Books XLV(15), 48–52.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivadulla, A. The Newtonian Limit of Relativity Theory and the Rationality of Theory Change. Synthese 141, 417–429 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000044994.31650.45
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000044994.31650.45