Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonverbal Encouragement of Participation in a Course: the Effect of Touching

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that touching leads to positive behavior, particularly in an educational context. A new experiment was carried out in which students were encouraged to intervene in a course by demonstrating the solution of a statistical exercise on the blackboard. According to the experiment, students were or were not briefly touched on the forearm by the teacher during the corrective exercise. After that, the teacher asked his students to demonstrate the exercise on the blackboard. The results showed that touching increases the volunteers’ rate. Various explanations (familiarity, status and mood) were suggested to explain such results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers, D. (2001). Nonverbal immediacy in the classroom. [On-line manuscript.] Available http://clearinghouse.mwsc.edu/manuscripts.

  • Allen, J. &; Shaw, D. (1990). Teachers' communication behaviors and supervisors' evaluation of instruction in elementary and secondary classrooms. Communication-Education, 39, 308-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacorn, C. &; Dixon, D. (1984). The effects of touch on depressed and vocationally undecided clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 488-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizman, A., Yinin, Y., Ronco, B., &; Schachar, T. (1980). Regaining self-esteem through helping behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 105, 203-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Pressman, B., Cabitt, J., &; Moran, P. (1982). Nonverbal intimacy, sex, and compliance: a field study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 253-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. (1991). Relational message interpretation of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 223-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication-Education, 39, 323-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, J. &; Tracy, D. (1977). Effects of touch and verbal reinforcement on the classroom behaviour of emotionally disturbed boys. Exceptional Children, 37, 553-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crusco, A. &; Wetzel, C. (1984). The midas touch: the effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 512-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, M., Mitchell-Bonair, I., &; Friedmann, E. (1986). The effect of touch on nutritional intake of chronic organic brain syndrome patients. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 611-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, T. (1999). Preschoolers in America are touched less and are more aggressive than preschoolers in France. Early Childhood Development and Care, 151, 11-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., Rytting, M., &; Heslin, R. (1976). Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects on interpersonal touch. Sociometry, 39, 416-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J.P. (1997). Affect and strategic communication: the effects of mood on the production and interpretation of verbal requests. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 28, 145-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J.P. (1998). Asking nicely? The effects of mood on responding to more or less polite request. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 173-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. &; Fordyce, J. (1983). Prosocial behavior as affected by eye contact, touch, and voice expression. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 125-129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M., Kiyohara, O., &; Pfannensteil, D. (1985). Interpersonal touch, social labeling and the foot-in-the-door effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 143-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guéguen, N. (2002). Kind of touch, gender and compliance to a request: a pilot study. Studia Psychologica, 44, 167-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1996). Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 23-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. &; Veccia, E. (1990). More ‘touching’ observations: new insights on men, women, and interpersonal touch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1155-1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. &; Smith, R. (1975). Mood and helping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 215-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. (1973). The politics of touch. In P. Brown (Ed.), Radical psychology. New-York: Harper &; Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. (1987). The effect of touch and gaze upon compliance and interest of interviewees. The Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 681-683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. (1992a). Effects of physical contact on customers' shopping time and behavior. Marketing Letters, 3, 49-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. (1992b). Tactile stimulation and consumer response. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 449-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. &; Ellis, S. (1988). Strategies to secure compliance for a mall intercept interview. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 539-551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. (1988). The effects of touch in the geriatric population. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 6, 35-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D., Gengler, C., &; Jain, A. (1995). What's in a name? A complimentary means of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 200-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D., Gengler, C., &; Jain, A. (1997). The name remembrance effect: a test of alternative explanations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 801-810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, M. (1968). Attraction toward flatterers of different statuses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 181-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaasma, M. &; Koper, R. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication-Education, 48, 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. &; Friedman, R. (1970). Experimenter-subject ‘distance’ and self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 278-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juni, S. &; Brannon, R. (1981). Interpersonal touching as a function of status and sex. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 135-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. &; Klock, J. (1973). The effect of nonverbal teacher approval on student attentive behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 643-654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, P. &; Isen, A. (1975). Further studies on the effect of feeling good on helping. Sociometry, 38, 141-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., Le, J.-M., &; Sherwyn, D. (1998). Reach out and touch your customers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39, 60-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, S. &; Pekor, C. (1985). Can teachers touch children anymore: physical contact and its value in child development. Young Children, 40, 10-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J., Richmond, V., &; Barraclough R. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: a cross-cultural investigation. Communication-Education, 45, 200-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannberg, J. &; Hansen, C. (1994). Post-compliance touch: an incentive for task performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 301-307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, J. (1973). Effects of touch on self-exploration and the therapeutic relationship. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 170-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsell, S. &; Goldman, M. (1984). The effect of touching different body areas on prosocial behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 269-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B. (1997). Effect of interest arousal on compliance with a request for help. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 49-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Gier, J., &; Willis, F. (1982). Interpersonal touch and compliance with a marketing request. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 35-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, R. &; Zweigenhaft, R. (1986). The effect on tipping of a waitress touching male and female customers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 141-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, L. &; Lupfer, M. (1987). Touching as teaching: the effect of touch on students' perceptions and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 800-809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, D. &; Hall, J. (1984). Gender differences in touch: an empirical and theorical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten, R., Nau, P., MacKenzie-Keating, S., Sameoto, D., &; Colavecchia, B. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 65-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J. (1978). Effects of mood states, costs, and benefits of helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1169-1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Bevan, K., &; Shortall, K. (1986). A touch of reinforcement: the effects of contingent teacher touch on the classroom behaviour of young children. Educational Review, 38, 207-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcher, S. &; Fisher, J. (1979). Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 87-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, F. &; Hamm, H. (1980). The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 49-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire GRESICO, IUT de Vannes-Département TC, Université de Bretagne-Sud, 8, rue Montaigne, BP 561-56017, Vannes, France. e-mail

    Nicolas Guéguen

Authors
  1. Nicolas Guéguen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guéguen, N. Nonverbal Encouragement of Participation in a Course: the Effect of Touching. Social Psychology of Education 7, 89–98 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPOE.0000010691.30834.14

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPOE.0000010691.30834.14

Keywords

Search

Navigation