Abstract
The current study contributes to 2 growing areas of research: one distinguishes between routine and strategic relational maintenance behaviors, and the other concerns the relative utility of biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of communication behaviors. Specifically, we sought to uncover sex and gender differences in routine and strategic maintenance and to test the relative strength of each as predictors of routine and strategic maintenance. Survey data were collected from 189 individuals in romantic relationships. Results indicated only one sex difference; women use routine openness more than men do. However, femininity was positively associated with the routine use of advice, conflict management, and openness. Masculinity was positively associated with the strategic use of openness and tasks. Femininity was not associated with strategic maintenance, and masculinity was not associated with routine maintenance. The value of distinguishing between sex and gender to explain how individuals function in relationships is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
references
Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2001). Antecedents in romantic jealousy experience, expression, and goals. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 370-391.
Bailey, W. C., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1987). Relation of sex and gender role to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637-648.
Ballard-Reisch, D., & Elton, M. (1992). Gender orientation and the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A psychological construct revisited. Sex Roles, 27, 291-306.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 195-205.
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures of assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196-205.
Blanchard-Fields, F., Suhrer-Roussel, L., & Hertzog, C. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers. Sex Roles, 30, 423-457.
Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J. A., & Thompson, B. (1997). The factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118-124.
Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to study sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41, 129-144.
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243-267.
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 6-23). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (1985). Love and sex-role stereotypes: Do macho men and feminine women make better lovers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 170-176.
Dainton, M. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In D. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52-66.
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity, and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255-272.
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (2000). Predicting maintenance enactment from relational schemata, spousal behavior, and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports, 17, 171-180.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 369-389.
Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163-173.
Duck, S. W. (1986). Human relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Duck, S. W. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45-60). New York: Academic Press.
Fitzpatrick, M., & Indvik, J. (1982). Implicit theories in enduring relationships: Psychological gender differences in the perception of one's mate. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 311-325.
Huston, T., & Houts, R. (1998). The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: The role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. In T. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 114-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ickes, W. (1985). Sex role influences on compatibility in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 187-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Johnson, R., & Wichern, D. (1992). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lamke, L. (1989). Marital adjustment among rural couples: The role of expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 579-590.
Lamke, L., Sollie, D., Durbin, R., & Fitzpatrick, J. (1994). Masculinity, femininity, and relational satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 535-554.
Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Monge, P. (1980). Multivariate multiple regression. In P. Monge & J. Cappella (Eds.), Multivariate techniques in human communication research (pp. 14-56). New York: Academic Press.
Ragan, S. L. (1989). Communication between the sexes: A consideration of differences in adult communication. In J. F. Nussbaum (Ed.), Life-span communication: Normative processes (pp. 179-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ragsdale, J. D. (1996). Gender, satisfaction level, and the use of relational maintenance strategies in marriage. Communication Monographs, 63, 354-369.
Reeder, H. (1996). A critical look at gender differences in communication research. Communication Studies, 47, 318-330.
Siavelis, R., & Lamke, L. (1992). Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 26, 149-159.
Spiegelhoff, M., & Dindia, K. (2001, July). Partners' perceptions of relational maintenance strategies and relationship satisfaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Prescott, AZ.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217-242.
Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale development, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306-323.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wheeless, V., & Dierks-Stewart, K. (1981). The psychometric properties of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Questions concerning reliability and validity. Communication Quarterly, 28, 173-186.
Wood, J. T., & Dindia, K. (1998). What's the difference? A dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aylor, B., Dainton, M. Biological Sex and Psychological Gender as Predictors of Routine and Strategic Relational Maintenance. Sex Roles 50, 689–697 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027570.80468.a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027570.80468.a0