Skip to main content
Log in

Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies are reported that examine gender differences in attitudes toward conventional buying and on-line buying. Thematic analysis of open-ended accounts (n=113) in Study 1 provides a rich, qualitative map of buying attitude dimensions that are important to young women and men. Study 2 is a quantitative survey (n=240) of functional, emotional–social, and identity-related buying motivations in the 2 environments. The on-line environment has an effect on buying attitudes, but more strongly so for women than for men. Whereas men's functional concerns are amplified—rather than changed—in the shift from conventional to on-line buying, women's motivational priorities show a reversal, and less involvement in shopping. In contrast to men, women's on-line buying is associated with barriers (social–experiential factors) and facilitators (efficiency, identity-related concerns) grounded in their attitudes toward conventional buying. This has implications for the ease with which women and men can and want to adapt to the accelerating shift toward computer-mediated shopping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

references

  • Angus Reid. (2001). The face of the web: Youth. Retrieved fromhttp://www.angusreid.com/media/dsp displaypr cdn.cfm? idto view=1169

  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergadaa, M., Faure, C., & Perrien, J. (1995). Enduring involvement with shopping. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(1), 17-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, A. (Ed.). (2000). I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Software Association. (2002, November). Retrieved from http://www.bsa.org/usa/press/newsreleases//2002-11-12.1362.phtml

  • Campbell, C. (2000). Shopaholics, spendaholics, and the question of gender. In A. Benson (Ed.), I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 57-75). New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for on-line retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • id=905358600&rel=true

  • Dittmar, H. (2000). The role of self-image in excessive buying. In A. Benson (Ed.), I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 105-132). New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (2001). Impulse buying in ordinary and “compulsive” consumers. In J. Baron, G. Loomes, & E. Weber (Eds.), Conflict and tradeoffs in decision-making (pp. 110-135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (in press). Understanding and diagnosing compulsive buying. In R. Coombs (Ed.), Addictive disorders: A guide to diagnosis and treatment. New York: Wiley.

  • Dittmar, H., Beattie, J., & Friese, S. (1996). Objects, decision considerations, and self-image in men's and women's impulse purchases. Acta Psychologica, 93, 187-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image—Is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 106-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H., & Long, K. M. (2001, August). Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in virtual and real-world buying dimensions and behaviour. Paper presented at the annual colloquium of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology, Bath, U.K.

  • Donthu, N., & Garcia, A. (1999). The Internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 52-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young. (1999). The second annual Ernst and Young Internet shopping study. Retrieved from http://www.e-consultancy.com/knowledge/whitepapers/9/the-second-annual-Internet-shopping-study.html

  • Fischer, E., & Gainer, B. (1991). I shop, therefore I am: The role of shopping in the social construction of women's identities. In G. A. Costa (Ed.), Gender and consumer behavior (pp. 350-357). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Centre. (1999). 10thWorld Wide Web User Survey. Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user surveys/User Survey Home.html

  • Interactive Media in Retail Group. (2002, December). Retrieved from http://www.imrg.org/IMRGindexDec2002.pdf

  • Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupiter MMXI. (2000). WebMilestones Oct 1999–Sept 2001: Two years in the evolution of the Internet in the U.K. Retrieved from http://uk.jupiter.mmxi.com/xp/uk/press/releases/

  • Korgaonkar, P. K., & Wolin, L. D. (1999). A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 53-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRose, R. (2001). On the negative effects of e-commerce: A sociocognitive exploration of unregulated on-line buying. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/larose.html

  • Li, H., Kuo, C., & Russell, M. G. (1999). The impact of perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations and demographics on consumer's on-line buying behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/hairong.html

  • Lohshe, G. L., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Consumer buying behavior on the Internet: Findings from panel data. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu

  • Lunt, P. K., & Livingstone, S. M. (1992). Shopping, spending, and pleasure. In Mass consumption and personal identity (pp. 86-100). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet (pp. 169-195). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Some notes on social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netvalue. (2001). 3 million new home Internet users in 2001. Retrieved from http://uk.netvalue.com/presse/cp0041.htm

  • Olivero, N. (2000, August). Consumption in electronic environments: Understanding new consumer's behavior. In E. Hölzl (Ed.), Fairness and cooperation (pp. 323-328). Proceedings of the joint colloquium of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics.

  • Office of National Statistics. (2001). Internet access: Householdand individuals. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/press release/Archive.asp

  • Pew. (1998). Basic patterns of Internet use. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/tech98mor.htm

  • Pew Internet and American Life. (2002). Women surpass men as e-shoppers during the holidays. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from: http://www.pewInternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report= 54

  • Pew Internet and American Life. (2003). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Retrieved September 20, 2003 from http://www.pewInternet. org/reports/toc.asp?Report=88

  • SkyNews. (2002,May21).U.K. Survey sponsored by Barclays Bank.Retrieved from http://www.nua.ie/surveys/?f=VS&art id=905357975&rel=true

  • Swaminathan, V., Lepowska-White, E., & Rao, B. P. (1999). Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved from http://www. ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/swaminathan.htm

  • UCLA Internet Report. (2003). “Surveying the Digital Future” Year Three. UCLA Centre for Communication Policy, January. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://ccp.ucla.edu/pages/ Internet-report.asp

  • id=905357804&rel=true

  • Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, R. (2000). Women, work and computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helga Dittmar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dittmar, H., Long, K. & Meek, R. Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations. Sex Roles 50, 423–444 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7

Navigation