Abstract
Two studies are reported that examine gender differences in attitudes toward conventional buying and on-line buying. Thematic analysis of open-ended accounts (n=113) in Study 1 provides a rich, qualitative map of buying attitude dimensions that are important to young women and men. Study 2 is a quantitative survey (n=240) of functional, emotional–social, and identity-related buying motivations in the 2 environments. The on-line environment has an effect on buying attitudes, but more strongly so for women than for men. Whereas men's functional concerns are amplified—rather than changed—in the shift from conventional to on-line buying, women's motivational priorities show a reversal, and less involvement in shopping. In contrast to men, women's on-line buying is associated with barriers (social–experiential factors) and facilitators (efficiency, identity-related concerns) grounded in their attitudes toward conventional buying. This has implications for the ease with which women and men can and want to adapt to the accelerating shift toward computer-mediated shopping.
Similar content being viewed by others
references
Angus Reid. (2001). The face of the web: Youth. Retrieved fromhttp://www.angusreid.com/media/dsp displaypr cdn.cfm? idto view=1169
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656.
Bergadaa, M., Faure, C., & Perrien, J. (1995). Enduring involvement with shopping. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(1), 17-25.
Benson, A. (Ed.). (2000). I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self. New York: Aronson.
Business Software Association. (2002, November). Retrieved from http://www.bsa.org/usa/press/newsreleases//2002-11-12.1362.phtml
Campbell, C. (2000). Shopaholics, spendaholics, and the question of gender. In A. Benson (Ed.), I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 57-75). New York: Aronson.
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for on-line retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511-535.
id=905358600&rel=true
Dittmar, H. (2000). The role of self-image in excessive buying. In A. Benson (Ed.), I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 105-132). New York: Aronson.
Dittmar, H. (2001). Impulse buying in ordinary and “compulsive” consumers. In J. Baron, G. Loomes, & E. Weber (Eds.), Conflict and tradeoffs in decision-making (pp. 110-135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dittmar, H. (in press). Understanding and diagnosing compulsive buying. In R. Coombs (Ed.), Addictive disorders: A guide to diagnosis and treatment. New York: Wiley.
Dittmar, H., Beattie, J., & Friese, S. (1996). Objects, decision considerations, and self-image in men's and women's impulse purchases. Acta Psychologica, 93, 187-206.
Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image—Is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 106-145.
Dittmar, H., & Long, K. M. (2001, August). Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in virtual and real-world buying dimensions and behaviour. Paper presented at the annual colloquium of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology, Bath, U.K.
Donthu, N., & Garcia, A. (1999). The Internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 52-58.
Ernst and Young. (1999). The second annual Ernst and Young Internet shopping study. Retrieved from http://www.e-consultancy.com/knowledge/whitepapers/9/the-second-annual-Internet-shopping-study.html
Fischer, E., & Gainer, B. (1991). I shop, therefore I am: The role of shopping in the social construction of women's identities. In G. A. Costa (Ed.), Gender and consumer behavior (pp. 350-357). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Centre. (1999). 10thWorld Wide Web User Survey. Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user surveys/User Survey Home.html
Interactive Media in Retail Group. (2002, December). Retrieved from http://www.imrg.org/IMRGindexDec2002.pdf
Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363-379.
Jupiter MMXI. (2000). WebMilestones Oct 1999–Sept 2001: Two years in the evolution of the Internet in the U.K. Retrieved from http://uk.jupiter.mmxi.com/xp/uk/press/releases/
Korgaonkar, P. K., & Wolin, L. D. (1999). A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 53-68.
LaRose, R. (2001). On the negative effects of e-commerce: A sociocognitive exploration of unregulated on-line buying. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/larose.html
Li, H., Kuo, C., & Russell, M. G. (1999). The impact of perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations and demographics on consumer's on-line buying behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/hairong.html
Lohshe, G. L., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Consumer buying behavior on the Internet: Findings from panel data. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu
Lunt, P. K., & Livingstone, S. M. (1992). Shopping, spending, and pleasure. In Mass consumption and personal identity (pp. 86-100). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet (pp. 169-195). London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1988). Some notes on social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
Netvalue. (2001). 3 million new home Internet users in 2001. Retrieved from http://uk.netvalue.com/presse/cp0041.htm
Olivero, N. (2000, August). Consumption in electronic environments: Understanding new consumer's behavior. In E. Hölzl (Ed.), Fairness and cooperation (pp. 323-328). Proceedings of the joint colloquium of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics.
Office of National Statistics. (2001). Internet access: Householdand individuals. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/press release/Archive.asp
Pew. (1998). Basic patterns of Internet use. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/tech98mor.htm
Pew Internet and American Life. (2002). Women surpass men as e-shoppers during the holidays. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from: http://www.pewInternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report= 54
Pew Internet and American Life. (2003). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Retrieved September 20, 2003 from http://www.pewInternet. org/reports/toc.asp?Report=88
SkyNews. (2002,May21).U.K. Survey sponsored by Barclays Bank.Retrieved from http://www.nua.ie/surveys/?f=VS&art id=905357975&rel=true
Swaminathan, V., Lepowska-White, E., & Rao, B. P. (1999). Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved from http://www. ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/swaminathan.htm
UCLA Internet Report. (2003). “Surveying the Digital Future” Year Three. UCLA Centre for Communication Policy, January. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://ccp.ucla.edu/pages/ Internet-report.asp
id=905357804&rel=true
Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.
Woodfield, R. (2000). Women, work and computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dittmar, H., Long, K. & Meek, R. Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations. Sex Roles 50, 423–444 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7