Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses bibliographic coupling analysis to plot out a patent citation map. It explores the current research and development in the high-tech electronic companies in Taiwan, and the relationship between companies and industries. Fifty-eight high-tech electronic companies under this study, between 1998 and 2000, obtained 4162 patents from U.S., and cited 24,852 patents during these years. Through the data from bibliographic coupling analysis, the paper categorizes these companies into 6 major groups: semiconductor, peripheral, scanners, notebook / monitor, system, IC design / packaging. This research also uses multidimensional scaling to plot out a patent citation map, graphically displaying the association among the groups. The result shows a higher similarity among companies in semiconductor sector, whereas the distinction between industries grows more and more ambivalent, even overlapping in some cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. W. L. HSIA, The value of patents toward business, Intellectual Property Management, 16 (1998) 20-21. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2000 TAIWAN INFORMATION INDUSTRY ALMANAC EDITING GROUP, 2000 Taiwan Information Industry Almanac, Taipei: Institute for Information Industry, 2001. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Y. MA, Y. L. YANG, A reassessment in the empirical study of the high-tech industry, Forum of Business, 2(2) (2001) 31-57. (In Chinese).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY, MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, R. O. C. 1996, The 1995 White Paper of Industries. http://doit.moea.gov.tw/06success/1995/dic.asp (23 July 2002) (In Chinese).

  5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE. 2002. Statistics of Taiwan's Applied and Issued Patents in 2001. http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/news/ShowNewsContent.asp?otype=1&postnum=1197&from=board (12 June 2002) (In Chinese).

  6. L. EGGHE, R. ROUSSEAU, Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Fractal geometry of information space as represented by co-citation clustering, Scientometrics, 20 (3) (1991) 439-449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. M. KESSLER, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14 (1963) 10-25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. PRICE, S. SCHIMINOVICH, A clustering experiment: First step toward a computer-generated classification scheme, Information Storage and Retrieval, 4 (1968) 271-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (4) (1998) 327-355.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Y. TSAY, C. W. WU, Co-citation study of semiconductor journals, Journal of Information, Communication, and Library Science, 8 (2) (2001) 9-21. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. NARIN, Patent bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 30 (1) (1994) 147-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. S. KARKI, Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool, World Patent Information, 19 (4) (1997) 269-272.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. MEYER, Patent citations in a novel field of technology-What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48 (2) (2000) 151-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, R. K. BUTER, T. N. vAN LEEUWEN, Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47 (2) (2000) 389-412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. NARIN, D. OLIVASTRO, Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison, Scientometrics, 41 (1-2) (1998) 51-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. ELLIS, G. HEPBURN, C. OPPENHEIM, Studies on patent citation networks, Journal of Documentation, 34 (1) (1978) 12-20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. VERSPAGEN, The role of large multinationals in the Dutch technology infrastructure: A patent citation analysis, Scientometrics, 47 (2) (2000) 427-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. C. MENG, M. J. HWANG, D. M. CHANG, K. H. KUO, Industry innovation indicator: Patent citation analysis and patent indicator (I), Journal of Technology Management, 5 (1) (2000) 31-49. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dar-Zen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, MH., Chiang, LY. & Chen, DZ. Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies. Scientometrics 58, 489–506 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006876.29052.bf

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006876.29052.bf

Keywords

Navigation