Abstract
One of the central issues in linguistics is whether or not language should be considered a self-contained, autonomous formal system, essentially reducible to the syntactic algorithms of meaning construction (as Chomskyan grammar would have it), or a holistic-functional system serving the means of expressing pre-organized intentional contents and thus accessible with respect to features and structures pertaining to other cognitive subsystems or to human experience as such (as Cognitive Linguistics would have it). The latter claim depends critically on the existence of principles governing the composition of semantic contents. Husserl's fourth Logical Investigation is well known as a genuine precursor for Chomskyan grammar. However, I will establish the heterogeneous character of the Investigation and show that the whole first part of it is devoted to the exposition of a semantic combinatorial system cognate to the one elaborated within Cognitive Linguistics. I will thus show how theoretical results in linguistics may serve to corroborate and shed light on those parts of Husserl's Fourth Investigation that have traditionally been dismissed as vague or simply ignored.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bar-Hillel, Y. 1957. Husserl's Conception of a Purely Logical Grammar. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (3): 362-369.
Benoist, J. 1999. L'A priori conceptuel —Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick. Paris: Vrin.
Benoist, J. 2001. Intentionalité et langage dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. Paris: PUF.
Bühler, K. 1934. Theory of Language —The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins (1990).
Cassirer, E. 1945. Structuralism in Modern Linguistics. Word 1: 99-121.
Fauconnier, G. 1999. Methods and Generalizations. In: T. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology, pp. 95-127. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fillmore, Ch. J. 1982. Frame Semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed), Linguistic in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
Gallagher, S. 1997. Mutual Enlightenment: Recent Phenomenology in Cognitive Science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4 (3): 195-214.
Gardiès, J.-L. 1975. Esquisse d'une grammaire rationnelle. Paris: Vrin.
Holenstein, E. 1976. Roman Jakobson's Approach to Language — Phenomenological Structuralism. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.
Husserl. E. 1900–1901. Logische Untersuchungen, 2nd edition. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag, (1913/1980). English translation: Logical Investigations. London/New York: Routledge, 2001.
Husserl, E. 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag (1985).
Ingarden, R. 1931. Das literarische Kunstwerk. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag (1972).
Jackendoff, R. 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language —Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 2000. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. 1987–1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vols. I–II. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mulligan, K. 1988. On Structure — Bühler's Linguistic and Psychological Examples. In: A. Eschenback (ed), Karl Bühler's Theory of Language, pp. 203-226. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Münch, D. 2002: The Relation of Husserl's Logical Investigations to Descriptive Psychology and Cognitive Science. In: F. Stjernfelt and D. Zahavi (eds), 100 Years of Phenomenology — Logical Investigations Revisited. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Petitot, J. 1985. Morphogenèse du sens. Paris: PUF.
Petitot, J. 1992. Physique du sens. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
Petitot, J. 1995. Morphodynamics and Attractor Syntax: Constituency in Visual Perception and Cognitive Grammar. In: R. F. Port and T. v. Gelder (eds), Mind as Motion —Explanations in the Dynamics of Cognition, pp. 227-281. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: MIT Press.
Smith, B. 1994: Austrian Philosophy —The Legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago/La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
Stjernfelt, F. 2000. Mereology and Semiotics. Sign System Studies 28: 73-98.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Tesnière, L. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Kliencksieck (1982).
Thom, R. 1972. Stabilité structurelle et Morphogenèse. New York-Paris: Benjarnin-Ediscience.
Thom, R. 1980. Modèles mathématiques de la morphogenèse. Paris: Christian Bourgois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bundgaard, P.F. The ideal scaffolding of language: Husser's fourth Logical Investigation in the light of cognitive linguistics. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 49–80 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041835.41703.49
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041835.41703.49