Use and misuse of landscape indices
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Landscape ecology has generated much excitement in the past two decades. One reason was that it brought spatial analysis and modeling to the forefront of ecological research. However, high expectations for landscape analysis to improve our understanding and prediction of ecological processes have largely been unfulfilled. We identified three kinds of critical issues: conceptual flaws in landscape pattern analysis, inherent limitations of landscape indices, and improper use of pattern indices. For example, many landscape analyses treat quantitative description of spatial pattern as an end itself and fail to explore relationships between pattern and process. Landscape indices and map data are sometimes used without testing their ecological relevance, which may not only confound interpretation of results, but also lead to meaningless results. In addition, correlation analysis with indices is impeded by the lack of data because of difficulties in large-scale experimentation and by complicated behavior of indices because of their varying responses to changes in scale and spatial pattern. These problems represent significant challenges to landscape pattern analysis, especially in terms of relating pattern to process. In this perspective paper, we examine the underlying problems of these challenges and offer some solutions.
This revised version was published online in May 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.
Allen R.F.H., O’Neill R.V. and Hoekstra T.W. 1984. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: Some working principles from hierarchy theory. USDA Forest Service General Tech Report RM-110, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Bian L. and Butler R. 1999. Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65: 73–84.
Brandt J. 1998. Key concepts and interdisciplinarity in landscape ecology: a summing-up and outlook. In: Dover J.W. and Bunce R.G.H. (eds), Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology, pp. 421–434. UK Association of International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE-UK), Garstang, Great Britain.
Cale W.G., Henebry G.M. and Yeakley J.A. 1989. Inferring process from pattern in natural communities. BioScience 39: 600–605.
Carpenter S.R. 1992. Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 73: 453–463.
Carpenter S.R. 1996. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 77: 453–463.
Dale M.R.T. 1999. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Flather C.H. and Sauer J.R. 1996. Using landscape ecology to test hypotheses about large-scale abundance in migratory birds. Ecology 77: 28–35.
Gardner R.H., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and O’Neill R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.
Gustafson E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143–156.CrossRef
Hamel P.B. 1992. The Land Manager’s Guide to the Birds in the South. The Nature Conservancy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Haines-Young R. and Chopping M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20: 418–445.
Hargis C.D., Bissonette J.A. and David J.L. 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13: 167–186.CrossRef
Hargrove W.W. and Pickering J. 1992. Pseudoreplication: A sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 6: 251–258.
Harris L.D. and Sanderson J. 2000. The re-membered landscape. In: Sanderson J. and Harris L.D. (eds), Landscape Ecology: A Top-Down Approach, pp. 91–112. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Hurlbert S.H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.
Hurlbert S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.
Jelinski D.E. and Wu J. 1996. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 11: 129–140.
Justice C.O., Markham B.L., Townshend J.R.G. and Kennard R.L. 1989. Spatial degradation of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1539–1561.
Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., O’Neill R.V. and Coleman P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.
Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.
Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.CrossRef
Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75: 2446–2455.
Li H. and Reynolds J. F. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73: 280–284.
Li H., Gartner D., Mou P. and Trettin C.C. 2000. A landscape model (LEEMATH) to evaluate effects of management impacts on timber and wildlife habitat. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27: 263–292.
Lovejoy S. 1982. Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science 216: 185–187.
Ludwig J.A., Wiens J.A. and Tongway D.J. 2000. A scaling rule for landscape patches and how it applies to conserving soil resources in Savannas. Ecosystems 3: 84–97.
Milne B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, pp. 199–235. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
Naveh Z. and Lieberman A.S. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
Oksanen L. 2001. Logic of experiments in ecology: Is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94: 27–38.CrossRef
O’Neill R.V., DeAngelis D.L., Waide J.B. and Allen T.F.H. 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
O’Neill R.V., Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., Jackson B., DeAngelis D. L., Milne B.T., Turner M.G., Zygmunt B., Christensen S.W., Dale V.H. and Graham R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.CrossRef
O’Neill R.V., Riitters K.H., Wickham J.D. and Jones K.B. 1999. Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment. Ecosystem Health 5: 225–233.CrossRef
Openshaw S. 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Geo Books, Norwich, UK.
Pickett S.T.A. and Cadenasso M.L. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269: 331–334.
Pickett S.T.A., Kolasa J. and Jones C.G. 1994. Ecological Understanding. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Risser P.G., Karr J.R. and Forman R.T.T. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publ. 2, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Riitters K.H., O’Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins K.B.J. and Jackson B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.CrossRef
Saura S. and Martinez-Millan J. 2001. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1027–1036.
Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.CrossRef
Turner M.G. 1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 4: 21–30.
Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-verlag, New York, New York, USA.
Turner M.G., O’Neill R.V., Gardner R.H. and Milne B.T. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3: 153–162.CrossRef
Urban D.L., O’Neill R.V. and Shugart H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology: A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37: 119–127.
Wickham J.D. and Riitters K.H. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16: 3585–3595.
Wickham J.D., O’Neill R.V., Riitters K.H., Wade T.G. and Jones K.B. 1997. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to land cover misclassification and differences in land cover composition. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 397–402.
Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.
Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., Van Horne B. and Ims R.A. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.
Wu J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.
Wu J. 2000. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.
Wu J. 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology 19: 125–138.CrossRef
Wu J. and Hobbs R. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17: 355–365.
Wu J. and Loucks O.L. 1995. From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarter Review of Biology 70: 439–466.
Wu J., Shen W. Sun W. and Tueller P.T. 2002. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17: 761–782.
- Use and misuse of landscape indices
Volume 19, Issue 4 , pp 389-399
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Conceptual flaws
- GIS and map data
- Landscape pattern analysis
- Pattern and process
- Author Affiliations
- 1. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Center for Forested Wetlands Research, 2730 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC, 29414, USA
- 2. Faculty of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Science, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA