Abstract
Because various definitions of inquiry exist in the science education literature and in classroom practice, elementary science methods students and instructors face dilemmas during the study of inquiry. Using field notes, instructor anecdotal notes, student products, and course artifacts, science methods course instructors created fictional journal entries to represent the experiences of both the instructors and students during instruction on inquiry. Identified dilemmas were varying definitions of inquiry, the struggle to provide sufficient inquiry-based science-learning experiences, perceived time constraints, determining how much course time should be slated for science instruction versus pedagogy instruction, instructors' and students' lack of inquiry-based learning experiences, grade versus trust issues, and students' science phobia. Instructors' attempts at dealing with these dilemmas included using analogies, increased field-experience time, modeling, and detailed rubrics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. S. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science meth-ods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.
Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491–510.
Abell, S. K., George, M. D., & Martini, M. (2002). Instructional strategies for teaching phases of the moon in elementary methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 85–100.
Abell, S. K., Martini, M., & George, M. D. (2001). “That's what scientists have to do”: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1095–1109.
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475–487.
Allen, S. (1997). Using scientific inquiry activities in exhibit explanations. Science Education, 81, 715–734.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Amer-icans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1–12.
Andersen, H. O., & Speece, S. (1995). The national science education standards: Program standards. The Hoosier Science Teacher, 21, 38–45.
Ash, D., & Kluger-Bell, B. (1999). Identifying inquiry in the K–5 classroom. Foundations (Vol. 2, NSF Rep. No. NSF99148, pp. 79–85). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Bianchini, J. A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 177–209.
Bloom, J. W. (2000). Creating a classroom community of young scientists: A desktop companion. Toronto, Ont., Canada: Irwin.
Caton, E., Brewer, C., & Brown, F. (2000). Building teacher-scientist partnerships: Teaching about energy through inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 7–15.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. ScienceScope, 23(6), 42–44.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937.
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. New York: Teachers College Press.
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645.
Keys, C. W., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 315–333.
Kluger-Bell, B. (1999). Recognizing inquiry: Comparing three hands-on teaching techniques. Foundations (Vol. 2, NSF Rep. No. NSF99148, pp. 39–50). Wash-ington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (2000). Problem solving and solving problems: Inquiry about inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 113–116.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Luft, J. A. (1999). Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: The extended inquiry observation rubric. Science Educator, 8(1), 9–18.
Marshall, J. A., & Dorward, J. T. (2000). Inquiry experiences as a lecture supplement for preservice elementary teachers and general education students. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S27–S36.
Martini, M., & Abell, S. K. (2000). The influence of studying the moon on preservice elementary teachers? Conceptions of science teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564–570.
Rossman, A. D. (1993). Managing hands-on inquiry. Science and Children, 31(1), 35–37.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: In-terpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., & Canaday, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning: A report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1221–1246.
Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1996). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Whitin, P., & Whitin, D. J. (1997). Inquiry at the window: Pursuing the wonders of learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, W.J., Abell, S.K., Hubbard, P.D. et al. Dilemmas of Teaching Inquiry in Elementary Science Methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education 15, 257–279 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048330.07586.d6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048330.07586.d6