Usage of and Compliance with Power Tactics in Routine Versus Nonroutine Work Settings
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examines situational determinants of power usage and compliance derived from the Interpersonal Power Interaction Model. Organizations where routine tasks predominate were compared with those where complex tasks prevail. Samples of workers (N = 194) and supervisors (N = 100) from four companies representing routine tasks and complex ones completed three versions of the Interpersonal Power Inventory (Raven, Schwarzwald & Koslowsky, 1998). Results indicated that in settings where routine tasks predominate usage of and compliance with harsh power tactics was greater than in complex ones. Yet, soft tactics were not related to task complexity. It was also found that rank and tactics interacted. Regardless of settings, supervisors as compared to subordinates reported more frequent usage of soft tactics and less frequent usage of harsh ones. The discussion suggests a mechanism for understanding these patterns.
- Aguinis, H. & Adams, S. K. R. (1998). Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence used in organizations: A strong inference approach. Group and Organization Management, 23, 414-446.
- Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 281-297.
- Bui, K. V., Raven, B. H., & Schwarzwald, J. (1994). Interpersonal satisfaction and influence tactics in close heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 429-442.
- Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
- Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971-981.
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A sex-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
- Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
- Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638-652.
- Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618-629.
- French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.
- Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Organization and Administrative Science, 61, 143-165.
- Harrison, E. F. (1975). The managerial decision making process. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
- Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99-110.
- Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1983). An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.) Negotiating in organizations (pp. 303-319). Beverly Hills: Sage.
- Koslowsky, M. & Schwarzwald, J. (1993). The use of power tactics to gain compliance: Testing aspects of Raven's (1988) theory in conflictual situations. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 135-144.
- Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001). The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.) The Use and Abuse of Power (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Koslowsky, M., Schwarzwald, J. & Ashuri, S. (2001). On the Relationship between Subordinates' compliance to Power Sources and Organizational Attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 555-476.
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Mintzberg, H. (1983a). Power in and around organizations: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Mintzberg, H. (1983b). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Podsakoff, P. M. & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387-411.
- Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.). Current studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
- Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
- Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49 (Whole no. 4): 227-251.
- Raven, B. H. (1999). Influence, power, religion, and the mechanisms of social control. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 161-186.
- Raven, B. F., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Conflict and power. In P. G. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict (pp. 69-109). New York: Academic Press.
- Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-322.
- Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1999). Gender, self-esteem, and focus of interest in the use of power strategies by adolescents in conflict situations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 15-32.
- Tedeschi, J. T. (1990). Self-presentation and social influence: An interactionist prospective. In M. J. Cody and M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 301-323). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
- Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R, & Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist. 26, 685-695.
- Vecchio, R. P., & Sussmann, M. (1989). Preferences for forms of supervisory social influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 135-143.
- Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416-423.
- Usage of and Compliance with Power Tactics in Routine Versus Nonroutine Work Settings
Journal of Business and Psychology
Volume 18, Issue 3 , pp 385-402
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- social power
- interpersonal influence
- organizational structure
- Industry Sectors