Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperative Learning Groups at the College Level: Differential Effects on High, Average, and Low Exam Performers

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A repeated-measures mixed-design was used in examining the effects of cooperative learning study teams on exam performance for 378 undergraduate students enrolled in one of 10 large sections of an introductory educational psychology course over a two-semester period. Students were assigned to 5-member cooperative groups based on previous exam achievement (low, average, high). Bonuses (20% of exam score) were offered to groups who improved their mean exam performance to a pre-established criterion in the cooperative-group phase. Results yielded an overall effect size of 0.42 for cooperative study versus individual study. Students who had obtained low and average scores on the preceding exam improved significantly during cooperative study, but the previously high achievers decreased somewhat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCE

  • Bruffee, K. A.(1999).Collaborative learning: Higher Education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.).Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. L., & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. In J. MacGregor, J. L. Cooper, K. A. Smith, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Strategies for energizing large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, D. R., & Grudnitski, G. (1996). Does cooperative learning mean equal learning? Journal of Education for Business, 7, 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992, October). What to say to advocates for the gifted. Educational Leadership, 50, 44-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998).Cooperative learning returns to college. Change, 30(4), 26-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelshaw-Levering, K., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Henry, J. R., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 523-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, D. J., & Young, A. M. (1999). Is cooperative learning effective for high achieving entrance students? Implications for policy and teaching resources. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33, 27-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, J., Cooper, J. L., Smith, K. A., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). (2000). Strategies for energizing large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E. A., & Colarulli, G. C. (1997). Collaborative teaching in the face of productivity concerns: The dispersed team model. Innovative Higher Education, 22, 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, C. S., & Dunn, M. S. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 55, 1161-1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using student team learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1996a). Cooperative learning in middle and secondary schools. The Clearing House, 4, 200-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1996b). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. A., & Williams, R. L. (2003). Multiple-choice exams: Explanations for student choices. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 136-138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Secondary and Middle Grades Education, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia

    Susan L. Stockdale

  2. Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee

    Robert L. Williams

Authors
  1. Susan L. Stockdale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert L. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stockdale, S.L., Williams, R.L. Cooperative Learning Groups at the College Level: Differential Effects on High, Average, and Low Exam Performers. Journal of Behavioral Education 13, 37–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000011259.97014.94

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000011259.97014.94

Search

Navigation